Response toward Public Health Policy Ambiguity and Insurance Decisions
Qiang Li

TL;DR
This paper examines how ambiguity in public health policies during COVID-19 influences insurance purchasing behavior, revealing increased willingness to pay among sensitive and income-disrupted groups, offering new insights into pandemic policy impacts.
Contribution
It provides novel analysis of the effects of COVID-19 policy ambiguity on insurance decisions, highlighting increased willingness to pay among vulnerable groups.
Findings
Sensitive groups' WTP is 12.2% above benchmark
Income-disrupted groups are more affected
Offers new perspectives on pandemic policy effects
Abstract
Adjustments to public health policy are common. This paper investigates the impact of COVID-19 policy ambiguity on specific groups' insurance consumption. The results show that sensitive groups' willingness to pay (WTP) for insurance is 12.2% above the benchmark. Groups that have experienced income disruptions are more likely to suffer this. This paper offers fresh perspectives on the effects of pandemic control shifts.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
