Towards Explainable TOPSIS: Visual Insights into the Effects of Weights and Aggregations on Rankings
Robert Susmaga, Izabela Szczech, Dariusz Brzezinski

TL;DR
This paper introduces WMSD-space, a visualization tool that explains how weights and aggregations influence TOPSIS rankings, making the method more interpretable for complex, real-world decision problems.
Contribution
It generalizes MSD-space to weighted criteria, enabling visual interpretation of TOPSIS with multiple criteria and weights, enhancing explainability.
Findings
WMSD-space effectively visualizes weighted TOPSIS aggregations.
The method improves interpretability of rankings with many criteria.
WMSD-space remains practical regardless of the number of criteria.
Abstract
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is extensively used across diverse industries to assess and rank alternatives. Among numerous MCDA methods developed to solve real-world ranking problems, TOPSIS remains one of the most popular choices in many application areas. TOPSIS calculates distances between the considered alternatives and two predefined ones, namely the ideal and the anti-ideal, and creates a ranking of the alternatives according to a chosen aggregation of these distances. However, the interpretation of the inner workings of TOPSIS is difficult, especially when the number of criteria is large. To this end, recent research has shown that TOPSIS aggregations can be expressed using the means (M) and standard deviations (SD) of alternatives, creating MSD-space, a tool for visualizing and explaining aggregations. Even though MSD-space is highly useful, it assumes equally…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Criteria Decision Making
