Evolving Testing Scenario Generation Method and Intelligence Evaluation Framework for Automated Vehicles

TL;DR

This paper introduces an evolving scenario generation method using deep reinforcement learning to create human-like background vehicles for testing and evaluating the intelligence of automated vehicles in complex, realistic driving environments.

Contribution

It proposes a novel DRL-based approach with human-like driver models and an evaluation framework for comprehensive AV intelligence assessment.

Findings

Evolving scenarios show higher complexity than baseline scenarios.

Over 85% similarity to naturalistic driving data.

Effective in evaluating AVs' intelligence and interaction capabilities.

Abstract

Interaction between the background vehicles (BVs) and automated vehicles (AVs) in scenario-based testing plays a critical role in evaluating the intelligence of the AVs. Current testing scenarios typically employ predefined or scripted BVs, which inadequately reflect the complexity of human-like social behaviors in real-world driving scenarios, and also lack a systematic metric for evaluating the comprehensive intelligence of AVs. Therefore, this paper proposes an evolving scenario generation method that utilizes deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to create human-like BVs for testing and intelligence evaluation of AVs. Firstly, a class of driver models with human-like competitive, cooperative, and mutual driving motivations is designed. Then, utilizing an improved "level-k" training procedure, the three distinct driver models acquire game-based interactive driving policies. And these models are assigned to BVs for generating evolving scenarios in which all BVs can interact continuously and evolve diverse contents. Next, a framework including safety, driving efficiency, and interaction utility are presented to evaluate and quantify the intelligence performance of 3 systems under test (SUTs), indicating the effectiveness of the evolving scenario for intelligence testing. Finally, the complexity and fidelity of the proposed evolving testing scenario are validated. The results demonstrate that the proposed evolving scenario exhibits the highest level of complexity compared to other baseline scenarios and has more than 85% similarity to naturalistic driving data. This highlights the potential of the proposed method to facilitate the development and evaluation of high-level AVs in a realistic and challenging environment.