Lessons from Generalization Error Analysis of Federated Learning: You May Communicate Less Often!

TL;DR

This paper analyzes how the frequency of communication rounds in federated learning affects the generalization error, revealing that more frequent communication can reduce generalization performance, with theoretical bounds and empirical evidence supporting this.

Contribution

The paper introduces the first PAC-Bayes and rate-distortion bounds on generalization error in federated learning, explicitly incorporating communication frequency effects.

Findings

Generalization error increases with more communication rounds for FSVM.

Faster decrease of population risk compared to empirical risk with increasing R.

Experimental results suggest population risk may increase beyond certain communication frequency.

Abstract

We investigate the generalization error of statistical learning models in a Federated Learning (FL) setting. Specifically, we study the evolution of the generalization error with the number of communication rounds $R$ between $K$ clients and a parameter server (PS), i.e., the effect on the generalization error of how often the clients' local models are aggregated at PS. In our setup, the more the clients communicate with PS the less data they use for local training in each round, such that the amount of training data per client is identical for distinct values of $R$. We establish PAC-Bayes and rate-distortion theoretic bounds on the generalization error that account explicitly for the effect of the number of rounds $R$, in addition to the number of participating devices $K$ and individual datasets size $n$. The bounds, which apply to a large class of loss functions and learning algorithms, appear to be the first of their kind for the FL setting. Furthermore, we apply our bounds to FL-type Support Vector Machines (FSVM); and derive (more) explicit bounds in this case. In particular, we show that the generalization bound of FSVM increases with $R$, suggesting that more frequent communication with PS diminishes the generalization power. This implies that the population risk decreases less fast with $R$ than does the empirical risk. Moreover, our bound suggests that the generalization error of FSVM decreases faster than that of centralized learning by a factor of $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\log(K)/K})$. Finally, we provide experimental results obtained using neural networks (ResNet-56) which show evidence that not only may our observations for FSVM hold more generally but also that the population risk may even start to increase beyond some value of $R$.