Learning via Wasserstein-Based High Probability Generalisation Bounds
Paul Viallard, Maxime Haddouche, Umut \c{S}im\c{s}ekli, Benjamin Guedj

TL;DR
This paper develops new Wasserstein distance-based PAC-Bayesian generalisation bounds that hold with high probability, apply to unbounded losses, and are practical for training algorithms in both batch and online learning settings.
Contribution
It introduces stronger Wasserstein-based PAC-Bayesian bounds that are high probability, applicable to unbounded losses, and suitable for optimization in structural risk minimisation.
Findings
Bounds hold with high probability.
Applicable to unbounded, heavy-tailed losses.
Empirical advantage demonstrated in experiments.
Abstract
Minimising upper bounds on the population risk or the generalisation gap has been widely used in structural risk minimisation (SRM) -- this is in particular at the core of PAC-Bayesian learning. Despite its successes and unfailing surge of interest in recent years, a limitation of the PAC-Bayesian framework is that most bounds involve a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence term (or its variations), which might exhibit erratic behavior and fail to capture the underlying geometric structure of the learning problem -- hence restricting its use in practical applications. As a remedy, recent studies have attempted to replace the KL divergence in the PAC-Bayesian bounds with the Wasserstein distance. Even though these bounds alleviated the aforementioned issues to a certain extent, they either hold in expectation, are for bounded losses, or are nontrivial to minimize in an SRM framework. In this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Methodsstyle-based recalibration module
