Automatic continuity of pure mapping class groups
Ryan Dickmann

TL;DR
This paper classifies infinite-type surfaces based on whether their pure mapping class groups exhibit automatic continuity, revealing precise conditions and extending understanding of topological group properties in geometric topology.
Contribution
It provides a complete classification of surfaces for which the pure mapping class group and its subgroups have automatic continuity, including cases with noncompact boundary.
Findings
Pure mapping class groups have automatic continuity for certain infinite-type surfaces.
Mapping class groups lack automatic continuity for surfaces with finitely many ends and no noncompact boundary.
Homomorphisms from certain subgroups to countable groups are trivial in some cases.
Abstract
We completely classify the orientable infinite-type surfaces such that , the pure mapping class group, has automatic continuity. This classification includes surfaces with noncompact boundary. In the case of surfaces with finitely many ends and no noncompact boundary components, we prove the mapping class group does not have automatic continuity. We also completely classify the surfaces such that , the subgroup of the pure mapping class group composed of elements with representatives that can be approximated by compactly supported homeomorphisms, has automatic continuity. In some cases when has automatic continuity, we show any homomorphism from to a countable group is trivial.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Operator Algebra Research
