The effects of increasing velocity on the tractive performance of planetary rovers

TL;DR

This study investigates how increasing the velocity of planetary rovers affects their tractive performance, revealing performance declines beyond 0.2 m/s but also potential for significantly faster traversal speeds with manageable efficiency loss.

Contribution

It provides experimental evidence on the impact of higher speeds on rover traction, including effects on drawbar pull, sinkage, and efficiency across different wheel designs and soils.

Findings

Drawbar pull and efficiency decrease beyond 0.2 m/s.

Wheel sinkage increases with velocity, contrary to previous beliefs.

Flexible wheels outperform rigid wheels at high speeds.

Abstract

An emerging paradigm is being embraced in the conceptualization of future planetary exploration missions. Ambitious objectives and increasingly demanding mission constraints stress the importance associated with faster surface mobility. Driving speeds approaching or surpassing 1 m/s have been rarely used and their effect on performance is today unclear. This study presents experimental evidence and preliminary observations on the impact that increasing velocity has on the tractive performance of planetary rovers. Single-wheel driving tests were conducted using two different metallic, grousered wheels-one rigid and one flexible-over two different soils, olivine sand and CaCO3-based silty soil. Experiments were conducted at speeds between 0.01-1 m/s throughout an ample range of slip ratios (5-90%). Three performance metrics were evaluated: drawbar pull coefficient, wheel sinkage, and tractive efficiency. Results showed similar data trends among all the cases investigated. Drawbar pull and tractive efficiency considerably decreased for speeds beyond 0.2 m/s. Wheel sinkage, unlike what published evidence suggested, increased with increasing velocities. The flexible wheel performed the best at 1m/s, exhibiting 2 times higher drawbar pull and efficiency with 18% lower sinkage under low slip conditions. Although similar data trends were obtained, a different wheel-soil interactive behavior was observed when driving over the different soils. Overall, despite the performance reduction experienced at higher velocities, a speed in the range of 0.2-0.3 m/s would enable 5-10 times faster traverses, compared to current rovers driving capability, while only diminishing drawbar pull and efficiency by 7%. The measurements collected and the analysis presented here lay the groundwork for initial stages in the development of new locomotion subsystems for planetary surface exploration. At the same time...