Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training
Zeqiu Wu, Yushi Hu, Weijia Shi, Nouha Dziri, Alane Suhr, Prithviraj, Ammanabrolu, Noah A. Smith, Mari Ostendorf, Hannaneh Hajishirzi

TL;DR
This paper introduces Fine-Grained RLHF, a novel framework that uses detailed human feedback at the segment level to improve language model training, addressing limitations of holistic feedback.
Contribution
It proposes a new fine-grained reward modeling approach that provides segment-level feedback and multiple feedback types, enhancing language model alignment and customization.
Findings
Improved detoxification and long-form QA performance.
Enhanced ability to customize LM behaviors.
Validated effectiveness through automatic and human evaluations.
Abstract
Language models (LMs) often exhibit undesirable text generation behaviors, including generating false, toxic, or irrelevant outputs. Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) - where human preference judgments on LM outputs are transformed into a learning signal - has recently shown promise in addressing these issues. However, such holistic feedback conveys limited information on long text outputs; it does not indicate which aspects of the outputs influenced user preference; e.g., which parts contain what type(s) of errors. In this paper, we use fine-grained human feedback (e.g., which sentence is false, which sub-sentence is irrelevant) as an explicit training signal. We introduce Fine-Grained RLHF, a framework that enables training and learning from reward functions that are fine-grained in two respects: (1) density, providing a reward after every segment (e.g., a sentence) is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Text Readability and Simplification
