Frontier AI developers need an internal audit function
Jonas Schuett

TL;DR
Frontier AI developers should implement internal audit functions to improve risk management, oversight, and governance, addressing unpredictable risks and enhancing safety in rapidly advancing AI development.
Contribution
The paper advocates for adopting internal audit functions in frontier AI development to strengthen governance and risk oversight, a novel application of corporate governance principles to AI.
Findings
Internal audit can identify ineffective risk practices
Enhances board's understanding of AI risks
Serves as a contact point for whistleblowers
Abstract
This article argues that frontier artificial intelligence (AI) developers need an internal audit function. First, it describes the role of internal audit in corporate governance: internal audit evaluates the adequacy and effectiveness of a company's risk management, control, and governance processes. It is organizationally independent from senior management and reports directly to the board of directors, typically its audit committee. In the IIA's Three Lines Model, internal audit serves as the third line and is responsible for providing assurance to the board, while the Combined Assurance Framework highlights the need to coordinate the activities of internal and external assurance providers. Next, the article provides an overview of key governance challenges in frontier AI development: dangerous capabilities can arise unpredictably and undetected; it is difficult to prevent a deployed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
