Privacy in Multimodal Federated Human Activity Recognition
Alex Iacob, Pedro P. B. Gusm\~ao, Nicholas D. Lane, Armand K. Koupai,, Mohammud J. Bocus, Ra\'ul Santos-Rodr\'iguez, Robert J. Piechocki, Ryan, McConville

TL;DR
This paper investigates how privacy constraints affect federated human activity recognition performance and proposes a method to balance privacy with accuracy by training modality-specific models across clients.
Contribution
It introduces a federated learning approach that maintains privacy at the modality level, reducing accuracy loss compared to strict data separation methods.
Findings
Privacy at the human or environment level causes 5-7% accuracy decrease.
Strict sensor data separation leads to 19-42% accuracy decrease.
The proposed method achieves only 7-13% accuracy reduction.
Abstract
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) training data is often privacy-sensitive or held by non-cooperative entities. Federated Learning (FL) addresses such concerns by training ML models on edge clients. This work studies the impact of privacy in federated HAR at a user, environment, and sensor level. We show that the performance of FL for HAR depends on the assumed privacy level of the FL system and primarily upon the colocation of data from different sensors. By avoiding data sharing and assuming privacy at the human or environment level, as prior works have done, the accuracy decreases by 5-7%. However, extending this to the modality level and strictly separating sensor data between multiple clients may decrease the accuracy by 19-42%. As this form of privacy is necessary for the ethical utilisation of passive sensing methods in HAR, we implement a system where clients mutually train both…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Age of Information Optimization · Cognitive Functions and Memory
