Recommendations for Verifying HDR Subjective Testing Workflows
Vibhoothi, Angeliki Katsenou, John Squires, Fran\c{c}ois Piti\'e, Anil, Kokaram

TL;DR
This paper provides recommendations for verifying HDR testing workflows, assessing HDR conversion techniques, and evaluating display technologies to ensure high-quality HDR content production.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive set of guidelines for HDR conformance testing and evaluates current HDR conversion methods and display technologies.
Findings
HDR conversion techniques vary in effectiveness
OLED and LCD displays show different performance characteristics
Recommended testing procedures improve HDR workflow validation
Abstract
Over the past few years, there has been an increase in the demand and availability of High Dynamic Range (HDR) displays and content. To ensure the production of high-quality materials, human evaluation is required. However, ascertaining whether the full playback pipeline is indeed HDR-compliant can be challenging. In this paper, we present a set of recommendations for conformance testing to validate various aspects of the testing workflow, including playback, displays, brightness, colours, and viewing environment. We assessed the effectiveness of HDR conversion techniques used in current standards development (3GPP) for making source materials. Additionally, we evaluate HDR display technologies, including OLED and LCD, using both consumer television and a reference monitor.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImage Enhancement Techniques · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Color Science and Applications
