Risk Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Endometrial Cancer Patients: A Causal Approach
Alessio Zanga, Alice Bernasconi, Peter J.F. Lucas, Hanny Pijnenborg,, Casper Reijnen, Marco Scutari, Fabio Stella

TL;DR
This paper develops a causal Bayesian network approach to assess lymph node metastasis risk in endometrial cancer, addressing data quality issues and bias, to improve clinical risk prediction.
Contribution
It introduces a bootstrap-based causal discovery algorithm with context variables to mitigate bias and handle missing data in observational clinical datasets.
Findings
Causal Bayesian network effectively models risk factors.
Bootstrap resampling improves causal discovery reliability.
Analysis highlights limitations due to missing-not-at-random data.
Abstract
Assessing the pre-operative risk of lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer patients is a complex and challenging task. In principle, machine learning and deep learning models are flexible and expressive enough to capture the dynamics of clinical risk assessment. However, in this setting we are limited to observational data with quality issues, missing values, small sample size and high dimensionality: we cannot reliably learn such models from limited observational data with these sources of bias. Instead, we choose to learn a causal Bayesian network to mitigate the issues above and to leverage the prior knowledge on endometrial cancer available from clinicians and physicians. We introduce a causal discovery algorithm for causal Bayesian networks based on bootstrap resampling, as opposed to the single imputation used in related works. Moreover, we include a context variable to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClinical practice guidelines implementation · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
