Poster: No safety in numbers: traffic analysis of sealed-sender groups in Signal
Eric Brigham, Nicholas Hopper

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the privacy vulnerabilities of Signal's Sealed Sender feature, demonstrating that group communication metadata can be deanonymized despite the protocol's obfuscation efforts.
Contribution
It extends previous deanonymization attacks from individual pairs to entire group conversations, revealing new privacy risks.
Findings
Group deanonymization is feasible despite Sealed Sender protections
Message delivery protocols leak enough information for deanonymization
The attack can identify all participants in group chats
Abstract
Secure messaging applications often offer privacy to users by protecting their messages from would be observers through end-to-end encryption techniques. However, the metadata of who communicates with whom cannot be concealed by encryption alone. Signal's Sealed Sender mechanism attempts to enhance its protection of this data by obfuscating the sender of any message sent with the protocol. However, it was shown by Martiny et al. that due to the message delivery protocols in Signal, the record of who receives messages can be enough to recover this metadata. In this work we extend the attack presented from deanonymizing communicating pairs to deanonymizing entire group conversations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · User Authentication and Security Systems
