Attacking Perceptual Similarity Metrics
Abhijay Ghildyal, Feng Liu

TL;DR
This paper systematically evaluates the robustness of perceptual similarity metrics against imperceptible adversarial attacks, revealing their vulnerability and providing a benchmark for future robustness improvements.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive adversarial attack framework against perceptual metrics and benchmarks their robustness, highlighting vulnerabilities and guiding future research.
Findings
All studied metrics are susceptible to common adversarial attacks.
Spatial-transformation attacks transfer effectively across metrics.
Combining attack methods increases transferability and robustness testing.
Abstract
Perceptual similarity metrics have progressively become more correlated with human judgments on perceptual similarity; however, despite recent advances, the addition of an imperceptible distortion can still compromise these metrics. In our study, we systematically examine the robustness of these metrics to imperceptible adversarial perturbations. Following the two-alternative forced-choice experimental design with two distorted images and one reference image, we perturb the distorted image closer to the reference via an adversarial attack until the metric flips its judgment. We first show that all metrics in our study are susceptible to perturbations generated via common adversarial attacks such as FGSM, PGD, and the One-pixel attack. Next, we attack the widely adopted LPIPS metric using spatial-transformation-based adversarial perturbations (stAdv) in a white-box setting to craft…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFace Recognition and Perception · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
