Controlling Biofilm Transport with Porous Metamaterials Designed with Bayesian Learning

TL;DR

This study uses Bayesian optimization and modeling to design porous metamaterials that enhance biofilm transport, demonstrating significant efficiency improvements and providing insights into biofilm growth mechanisms for engineered applications.

Contribution

It introduces a Bayesian learning-based approach for optimizing porous materials to control biofilm transport, with validated design strategies and mechanistic insights.

Findings

BO is 92.89% more efficient than grid search for lattice metamaterials

BO is 223.04% more efficient for 3D porous media

Optimal designs outperform unconfined space in biofilm growth and transport

Abstract

Biofilm growth and transport in confined systems frequently occur in natural and engineered systems. Designing customizable engineered porous materials for controllable biofilm transportation properties could significantly improve the rapid utilization of biofilms as engineered living materials for applications in pollution alleviation, material self-healing, energy production, and many more. We combine Bayesian optimization (BO) and individual-based modeling to conduct design optimizations for maximizing different porous materials' (PM) biofilm transportation capability. We first characterize the acquisition function in BO for designing 2-dimensional porous membranes. We use the expected improvement acquisition function for designing lattice metamaterials (LM) and 3-dimensional porous media (3DPM). We find that BO is 92.89% more efficient than the uniform grid search method for LM and 223.04% more efficient for 3DPM. For all three types of structures, the selected characterization simulation tests are in good agreement with the design spaces approximated with Gaussian process regression. All the extracted optimal designs exhibit better biofilm growth and transportability than unconfined space without substrates. Our comparison study shows that PM stimulates biofilm growth by taking up volumetric space and pushing biofilms' upward growth, as evidenced by a 20% increase in bacteria cell numbers in unconfined space compared to porous materials, and 128% more bacteria cells in the target growth region for PM-induced biofilm growth compared with unconfined growth. Our work provides deeper insights into the design of substrates to tune biofilm growth, analyzing the optimization process and characterizing the design space, and understanding biophysical mechanisms governing the growth of biofilms.