A Survey on Intersectional Fairness in Machine Learning: Notions, Mitigation, and Challenges
Usman Gohar, Lu Cheng

TL;DR
This survey reviews the current state of intersectional fairness in machine learning, discussing notions, mitigation strategies, and challenges related to biases involving multiple sensitive attributes.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive taxonomy of intersectional fairness notions and mitigation methods, highlighting key challenges and guiding future research directions.
Findings
Identifies multiple intersectional bias types in machine learning.
Summarizes existing fairness mitigation techniques for intersectional attributes.
Outlines key challenges and future research directions in intersectional fairness.
Abstract
The widespread adoption of Machine Learning systems, especially in more decision-critical applications such as criminal sentencing and bank loans, has led to increased concerns about fairness implications. Algorithms and metrics have been developed to mitigate and measure these discriminations. More recently, works have identified a more challenging form of bias called intersectional bias, which encompasses multiple sensitive attributes, such as race and gender, together. In this survey, we review the state-of-the-art in intersectional fairness. We present a taxonomy for intersectional notions of fairness and mitigation. Finally, we identify the key challenges and provide researchers with guidelines for future directions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
