More accurate $\sigma(\mathcal{G} \,\mathcal{G}\rightarrow h)$, $\Gamma(h \rightarrow \mathcal{G} \,\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{A} \mathcal{A}, \bar{\Psi} {\Psi})$ and Higgs width results via the geoSMEFT
Adam Martin, Michael Trott

TL;DR
This paper enhances Standard Model Effective Field Theory predictions for Higgs production and decay processes by incorporating full two-loop Standard Model results and dimension-eight SMEFT corrections, improving accuracy and consistency.
Contribution
It develops a comprehensive framework combining two-loop SM results with dimension-eight SMEFT corrections for Higgs processes using the geometric SMEFT formalism.
Findings
Extended predictions for Higgs production and decay rates.
Inclusion of higher-order SMEFT corrections up to (ar{v}_T^4/\u03bb^4).
Updated total Higgs width with higher-order effects.
Abstract
We develop Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) predictions of , , to incorporate full two loop Standard Model results at the amplitude level, in conjunction with dimension eight SMEFT corrections. We simultaneously report consistent results including leading QCD corrections and dimension eight SMEFT corrections. This extends the predictions of the former processes to a full set of corrections at and , where is the electroweak scale vacuum expectation value and is the cut off scale of the SMEFT. Throughout, cross consistency between the operator and loop expansions is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
