Predicting Cardiovascular Disease Risk using Photoplethysmography and Deep Learning

TL;DR

This study demonstrates that a deep learning model using smartphone-based photoplethysmography (PPG) can predict 10-year cardiovascular risk with accuracy comparable to traditional office-based scores, enabling low-cost, large-scale screening in resource-limited settings.

Contribution

The paper introduces a novel PPG-based deep learning risk score for cardiovascular events, showing comparable performance to established clinical scores in a large cohort.

Findings

DLS's C-statistic was 71.1%, non-inferior to the refit-WHO score.

Adding DLS features improved the traditional score's C-statistic by 1.0%.

PPG-based risk prediction is feasible for community screening in low-resource areas.

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are responsible for a large proportion of premature deaths in low- and middle-income countries. Early CVD detection and intervention is critical in these populations, yet many existing CVD risk scores require a physical examination or lab measurements, which can be challenging in such health systems due to limited accessibility. Here we investigated the potential to use photoplethysmography (PPG), a sensing technology available on most smartphones that can potentially enable large-scale screening at low cost, for CVD risk prediction. We developed a deep learning PPG-based CVD risk score (DLS) to predict the probability of having major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death) within ten years, given only age, sex, smoking status and PPG as predictors. We compared the DLS with the office-based refit-WHO score, which adopts the shared predictors from WHO and Globorisk scores (age, sex, smoking status, height, weight and systolic blood pressure) but refitted on the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort. In UKB cohort, DLS's C-statistic (71.1%, 95% CI 69.9-72.4) was non-inferior to office-based refit-WHO score (70.9%, 95% CI 69.7-72.2; non-inferiority margin of 2.5%, p<0.01). The calibration of the DLS was satisfactory, with a 1.8% mean absolute calibration error. Adding DLS features to the office-based score increased the C-statistic by 1.0% (95% CI 0.6-1.4). DLS predicts ten-year MACE risk comparable with the office-based refit-WHO score. It provides a proof-of-concept and suggests the potential of a PPG-based approach strategies for community-based primary prevention in resource-limited regions.