Estimating and Correcting Degree Ratio Bias in the Network Scale-up Method
Ian Laga, Jessica P. Kunke, Tyler H. McCormick, Xiaoyue Niu

TL;DR
This paper investigates the degree ratio bias in the Network Scale-up Method, proposing a new adjustment technique to improve size estimates of marginalized populations by accounting for social network size differences.
Contribution
It introduces a method to estimate degree ratios without extra data and demonstrates improved accuracy of NSUM estimates through simulations and real data.
Findings
Degree ratio bias significantly affects size estimates.
The proposed adjustment improves estimation accuracy.
Validation with simulations and real data confirms effectiveness.
Abstract
The Network Scale-up Method (NSUM) uses social networks and answers to "How many X's do you know?" questions to estimate sizes of groups excluded by standard surveys. This paper addresses the bias caused by varying average social network sizes across populations, commonly referred to as the degree ratio bias. This bias is especially important for marginalized populations like sex workers and drug users, where members tend to have smaller social networks than the average person. We show how the degree ratio affects size estimates and provide a method to estimate degree ratios without collecting additional data. We demonstrate that our adjustment procedure improves the accuracy of NSUM size estimates using simulations and data from two data sources.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques · Social Capital and Networks · Mental Health Research Topics
