Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations of gold nanoparticle dose-enhanced radiotherapy I. Cellular dose enhancement in microscopic models

TL;DR

This study uses Monte Carlo simulations to analyze how gold nanoparticle configurations, sizes, and energies affect cellular dose enhancement in radiotherapy, providing insights for optimizing GNP-based treatments.

Contribution

It introduces a detailed Monte Carlo modeling approach to evaluate cellular dose enhancement factors considering various GNP configurations and parameters, highlighting their impact on dose enhancement.

Findings

GNP modeling approach significantly affects DEF calculations.

Perinuclear GNPs yield higher dose enhancement than endosomal GNPs.

Cell size and photon energy critically influence DEF values.

Abstract

Purpose: The introduction of Gold NanoParticles (GNPs) in radiotherapy requires consideration of GNP size, location, and quantity, and more, as well as beam quality. The work is presented in two parts, with Part I (this work) investigating accurate and efficient MC modeling to calculate nucleus and cytoplasm Dose Enhancement Factors (n,cDEFs). Part II then evaluates cell dose enhancement factors across macroscopic length scales. Methods: Different methods of modeling gold within cells are compared: a contiguous volume of either pure gold or gold-tissue mixture or discrete GNPs. MC simulations with EGSnrc are performed to calculate n,cDEF for a cell considering 10 to 370 keV incident photons, gold concentrations from 4 to 24~mg of gold per gram, and three different GNP configurations: GNPs distributed around the surface of the nucleus or packed into one or four endosomes. Results: n,cDEFs are sensitive to the model of gold in the cell, with differences of up to 17% observed between models. Across cell/nucleus radii, source energies, and gold concentrations, n,cDEF are highest for GNPs in the perinuclear configuration, compared with GNPs in endosomes. Across all simulations of the default cell, nDEFs and cDEFs range from one to 6.83 and 3.87, respectively. If the cell size is changed, much higher n,cDEFs are observed. n,cDEF are maximized at photon energies at or just above the K- or L-edges of gold. Conclusions: This work demonstrates many physics trends on DEFs at the cellular level, including that cellular DEFs are sensitive to gold modeling approach, GNP configuration, cell/nucleus size, gold concentration, and incident source energy. These data will allow one to optimize or estimate DEF using not only GNP uptake, but account for incident photon energy and intracellular configuration of GNPs. Part II will expand the investigation, applying the cell model in cm-scale phantoms.