Guaranteeing Envy-Freeness under Generalized Assignment Constraints
Siddharth Barman, Arindam Khan, Sudarshan Shyam, and K. V. N., Sreenivas

TL;DR
This paper introduces a framework for fair division under generalized assignment constraints, guaranteeing the existence and computability of envy-free allocations for divisible and indivisible goods, with novel fairness notions and algorithms.
Contribution
It defines feasible envy-freeness (FEF and FEFx) under generalized constraints and proves existence and efficient algorithms for these fairness notions, resolving open problems.
Findings
FEF allocations exist and are efficiently computable for divisible goods.
FEFx allocations always exist for indivisible goods under these constraints.
Provides algorithms including a pseudo-polynomial time method and an FPTAS for FEFx allocations.
Abstract
We study fair division of goods under the broad class of generalized assignment constraints. In this constraint framework, the sizes and values of the goods are agent-specific, and one needs to allocate the goods among the agents fairly while further ensuring that each agent receives a bundle of total size at most the corresponding budget of the agent. Since, in such a constraint setting, it may not always be feasible to partition all the goods among the agents, we conform -- as in recent works -- to the construct of charity to designate the set of unassigned goods. For this allocation framework, we obtain existential and computational guarantees for envy-free (appropriately defined) allocation of divisible and indivisible goods, respectively, among agents with individual, additive valuations for the goods. We deem allocations to be fair by evaluating envy only with respect to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
