A Comparison of Pneumatic Actuators for Soft Growing Vine Robots

TL;DR

This paper compares three pneumatic actuators for soft vine robots, analyzing their performance in eversion, bending, motion, and force, and demonstrates a long vine robot navigating complex environments.

Contribution

It introduces a comprehensive comparison of pouch, cPAM, and fPAM actuators and develops a predictive model for their pressure-bending behavior.

Findings

cPAM exhibits superior bending and force output

fPAM actuates fastest and everts at lowest pressure

Larger actuators produce more deformation but inflate slower

Abstract

Soft pneumatic actuators are used to steer soft growing "vine" robots while being flexible enough to undergo the tip eversion required for growth. In this study, we compared the performance of three types of pneumatic actuators in terms of their ability to perform eversion, quasi-static bending, dynamic motion, and force output: the pouch motor, the cylindrical pneumatic artificial muscle (cPAM), and the fabric pneumatic artificial muscle (fPAM). The pouch motor is advantageous for prototyping due to its simple manufacturing process. The cPAM exhibits superior bending behavior and produces the highest forces, while the fPAM actuates fastest and everts at the lowest pressure. We evaluated a range of dimensions for each actuator type. Larger actuators can produce more significant deformations and forces, but smaller actuators inflate faster and can evert at a lower pressure. Because vine robots are lightweight, the effect of gravity on the functionality of different actuators is minimal. We developed a new analytical model that predicts the pressure-to-bending behavior of vine robot actuators. Using the actuator results, we designed and demonstrated a 4.8 m long vine robot equipped with highly maneuverable 60x60 mm cPAMs in a three-dimensional obstacle course. The vine robot was able to move around sharp turns, travel through a passage smaller than its diameter, and lift itself against gravity.