The Dark Side of ChatGPT: Legal and Ethical Challenges from Stochastic Parrots and Hallucination
Zihao Li

TL;DR
This paper discusses the legal and ethical challenges posed by large language models like ChatGPT, focusing on risks such as hallucinations and stochastic parrots, and argues that current EU regulations may be insufficient.
Contribution
It highlights the emerging risks of LLMs and advocates for evolving EU AI regulations to better address issues like hallucinations and stochastic parrots.
Findings
LLMs introduce significant legal and ethical risks.
Current EU regulations may underestimate these risks.
Regulatory evolution is necessary to mitigate LLM-related challenges.
Abstract
With the launch of ChatGPT, Large Language Models (LLMs) are shaking up our whole society, rapidly altering the way we think, create and live. For instance, the GPT integration in Bing has altered our approach to online searching. While nascent LLMs have many advantages, new legal and ethical risks are also emerging, stemming in particular from stochastic parrots and hallucination. The EU is the first and foremost jurisdiction that has focused on the regulation of AI models. However, the risks posed by the new LLMs are likely to be underestimated by the emerging EU regulatory paradigm. Therefore, this correspondence warns that the European AI regulatory paradigm must evolve further to mitigate such risks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
MethodsRefunds@Expedia|||How do I get a full refund from Expedia? · Attention Is All You Need · Cosine Annealing · Softmax · Linear Layer · Byte Pair Encoding · Adam · Layer Normalization · Attention Dropout · Dense Connections
