Guidance note on best statistical practices for TOAR analyses
Kai-Lan Chang, Martin G. Schultz, Gerbrand Koren, Niklas Selke

TL;DR
This paper provides comprehensive guidance on best statistical practices for trend analysis in TOAR publications, emphasizing consistent communication of uncertainty and evaluating common techniques.
Contribution
It introduces standardized recommendations for statistical trend analysis and uncertainty communication tailored for TOAR's diverse research applications.
Findings
Guidelines for reporting trends and uncertainties
Evaluation of strengths and weaknesses of common methods
Recommendations R1 to R9 for statistical practices
Abstract
The aim of this guidance note is to provide recommendations on best statistical practices and to ensure consistent communication of statistical analysis and associated uncertainty across TOAR publications. The scope includes approaches for reporting trends, a discussion of strengths and weaknesses of commonly used techniques, and calibrated language for the communication of uncertainty. The focus of this guidance note is placed on trend analysis, which is expected to be the main statistical topic of interest across many TOAR-II focus working groups, but some of the recommendations and principles provided below are also valid for other applications. Recommendations are highlighted and numbered from R1 to R9.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Safety Analysis
