Robust, randomized preconditioning for kernel ridge regression
Mateo D\'iaz, Ethan N. Epperly, Zachary Frangella, Joel A. Tropp, and Robert J. Webber

TL;DR
This paper introduces two robust randomized preconditioning methods for kernel ridge regression that significantly improve computational efficiency for large datasets, with guarantees under specific eigenvalue decay conditions.
Contribution
It presents RPCholesky and KRILL preconditioning techniques that enable efficient, accurate solutions to large-scale KRR problems with theoretical guarantees.
Findings
RPCholesky solves full-data KRR in $O(N^2)$ operations.
KRILL efficiently handles KRR with selected data centers.
Both methods are practical for large datasets.
Abstract
This paper investigates preconditioned conjugate gradient techniques for solving kernel ridge regression (KRR) problems with a medium to large number of data points (), and it describes two methods with the strongest guarantees available. The first method, RPCholesky preconditioning, accurately solves the full-data KRR problem in arithmetic operations, assuming sufficiently rapid polynomial decay of the kernel matrix eigenvalues. The second method, KRILL preconditioning, offers an accurate solution to a restricted version of the KRR problem involving selected data centers at a cost of operations. The proposed methods efficiently solve a range of KRR problems, making them well-suited for practical applications.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
