Bridging Declarative, Procedural, and Conditional Metacognitive Knowledge Gap Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Mark Abdelshiheed, John Wesley Hostetter, Tiffany Barnes, Min Chi

TL;DR
This study employs Deep Reinforcement Learning to deliver adaptive metacognitive interventions in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, effectively bridging knowledge gaps and enhancing student learning across different domains.
Contribution
It introduces a DRL-based approach to tailor metacognitive support, improving strategic decision-making and learning outcomes in ITSs.
Findings
DRL interventions improved student performance on both tutors.
DRL bridged the metacognitive knowledge gap effectively.
Students' strategic decisions became more autonomous after DRL support.
Abstract
In deductive domains, three metacognitive knowledge types in ascending order are declarative, procedural, and conditional learning. This work leverages Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) in providing adaptive metacognitive interventions to bridge the gap between the three knowledge types and prepare students for future learning across Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs). Students received these interventions that taught how and when to use a backward-chaining (BC) strategy on a logic tutor that supports a default forward-chaining strategy. Six weeks later, we trained students on a probability tutor that only supports BC without interventions. Our results show that on both ITSs, DRL bridged the metacognitive knowledge gap between students and significantly improved their learning performance over their control peers. Furthermore, the DRL policy adapted to the metacognitive development on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Online Learning and Analytics · Topic Modeling
