Optimism, overconfidence, and moral hazard
Ludvig Sinander

TL;DR
This paper revisits the moral-hazard model, linking it to behavioral traits like overconfidence and optimism, providing testable axioms and parameter identification within a formal framework.
Contribution
It introduces behavioral definitions of overconfidence and optimism within the moral-hazard model and demonstrates their identification and empirical testability.
Findings
Moral-hazard model parameters are identifiable.
Behavioral traits like overconfidence are formally characterized.
The model relates to the variational choice model under uncertainty.
Abstract
I revisit the standard moral-hazard model, in which an agent's preference over contracts is rooted in costly effort choice. I characterise the behavioural content of the model in terms of empirically testable axioms, and show that the model's parameters are identified. I propose general behavioural definitions of relative (over)confidence and optimism, and characterise these in terms of the parameters of the moral-hazard model. My formal results are rooted in a simple but powerful insight: that the moral-hazard model is closely related to the well-known 'variational' model of choice under uncertainty.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Auction Theory and Applications
