Fairness And Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, And Mitigation Strategies
Emilio Ferrara

TL;DR
This survey provides a comprehensive overview of sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies for fairness and bias in AI, emphasizing the challenges posed by generative AI and societal implications.
Contribution
It offers a systematic review of AI bias, including generative AI biases, and discusses interdisciplinary mitigation approaches and ethical considerations.
Findings
Bias sources include data, algorithm, and human decisions.
Generative AI can amplify societal stereotypes.
Mitigation strategies involve data, model, and post-processing techniques.
Abstract
The significant advancements in applying Artificial Intelligence (AI) to healthcare decision-making, medical diagnosis, and other domains have simultaneously raised concerns about the fairness and bias of AI systems. This is particularly critical in areas like healthcare, employment, criminal justice, credit scoring, and increasingly, in generative AI models (GenAI) that produce synthetic media. Such systems can lead to unfair outcomes and perpetuate existing inequalities, including generative biases that affect the representation of individuals in synthetic data. This survey paper offers a succinct, comprehensive overview of fairness and bias in AI, addressing their sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies. We review sources of bias, such as data, algorithm, and human decision biases - highlighting the emergent issue of generative AI bias where models may reproduce and amplify…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
