Revenue Management without Demand Forecasting: A Data-Driven Approach for Bid Price Generation

TL;DR

This paper introduces a data-driven revenue management method that generates bid prices without demand forecasting, using only historical booking data, and demonstrates its near-optimal performance and robustness through extensive simulations.

Contribution

It presents a novel approach to revenue management that eliminates the need for demand forecasting by leveraging historical booking data and neural networks.

Findings

Method achieves less than 1% revenue gap from the theoretical optimum.

Approach remains robust under demand misspecification.

Outperforms traditional demand forecasting methods in volatile demand scenarios.

Abstract

Traditional revenue management relies on long and stable historical data and predictable demand patterns. However, meeting those requirements is not always possible. Many industries face demand volatility on an ongoing basis, an example would be air cargo which has much shorter booking horizon with highly variable batch arrivals. Even for passenger airlines where revenue management (RM) is well-established, reacting to external shocks is a well-known challenge that requires user monitoring and manual intervention. Moreover, traditional RM comes with strict data requirements including historical bookings and pricing even in the absence of any bookings, spanning multiple years. For companies that have not established a practice in RM, that type of extensive data is usually not available. We present a data-driven approach to RM which eliminates the need for demand forecasting and optimization techniques. We develop a methodology to generate bid prices using historical booking data only. Our approach is an ex-post greedy heuristic to estimate proxies for marginal opportunity costs as a function of remaining capacity and time-to-departure solely based on historical booking data. We utilize a neural network algorithm to project bid price estimations into the future. We conduct an extensive simulation study where we measure performance of our methodology compared to that of an optimally generated bid price using dynamic programming (DP). We also extend our simulations to measure performance of both data-driven and DP generated bid prices under the presence of demand misspecification. Our results show that our data-driven methodology stays near a theoretical optimum (<1% revenue gap) for a wide-range of settings, whereas DP deviates more significantly from the optimal as the magnitude of misspecification is increased. This highlights the robustness of our data-driven approach.