On the Category of Harish-Chandra Block Modules
Dylan Fillmore

TL;DR
This paper generalizes the structure theory of Harish-Chandra modules by removing the quasicommutativity assumption on the subalgebra, introducing an equivalence relation on maximal ideals, and describing modules via block decompositions and category equivalences.
Contribution
It extends previous results by defining Harish-Chandra block modules with respect to an equivalence relation, providing a decomposition of module categories, and establishing category equivalences under broader conditions.
Findings
Decomposition of the category of Harish-Chandra block modules.
Equivalence between Harish-Chandra block modules and profinite modules over a category.
Conditions for finiteness of simple Harish-Chandra block modules with a given support.
Abstract
If is a subalgebra of , then an -module is called a Harish-Chandra module if it is the direct sum of its generalized weight spaces with respect to . In 1994, Drozd, Futorny, and Ovsienko defined a generalization of a central subalgebra called a Harish-Chandra subalgebra and showed that when is a Harish-Chandra subalgebra of the structure of Harish-Chandra -modules can be described using information about the relationship between and the cofinite maximal ideals of . We extend these results by dropping the assumption that is quasicommutative. We facilitate this by introducing an equivalence relation on the set of cofinite maximal ideals of . We define Harish-Chandra block modules with respect to to be -modules that are the direct sum of so called block spaces corresponding to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Advanced Algebra and Geometry
