Design, Integration, and Field Evaluation of a Robotic Blossom Thinning System for Tree Fruit Crops

TL;DR

This paper introduces a robotic system for blossom thinning in apple orchards, combining computer vision, AI, and robotic manipulation to improve precision and reduce labor costs in orchard management.

Contribution

The study presents a novel integrated robotic blossom thinning system with AI and robotic manipulation, demonstrating effective targeted thinning in a commercial orchard setting.

Findings

Boundary thinning removed 67.2% of flowers with a 9.0 sec cycle

Center thinning removed 59.4% of flowers with a 7.2 sec cycle

System shows promise for commercial adoption to improve thinning efficiency

Abstract

The US apple industry relies heavily on semi-skilled manual labor force for essential field operations such as training, pruning, blossom and green fruit thinning, and harvesting. Blossom thinning is one of the crucial crop load management practices to achieve desired crop load, fruit quality, and return bloom. While several techniques such as chemical, and mechanical thinning are available for large-scale blossom thinning such approaches often yield unpredictable thinning results and may cause damage the canopy, spurs, and leaf tissue. Hence, growers still depend on laborious, labor intensive and expensive manual hand blossom thinning for desired thinning outcomes. This research presents a robotic solution for blossom thinning in apple orchards using a computer vision system with artificial intelligence, a six degrees of freedom robotic manipulator, and an electrically actuated miniature end-effector for robotic blossom thinning. The integrated robotic system was evaluated in a commercial apple orchard which showed promising results for targeted and selective blossom thinning. Two thinning approaches, center and boundary thinning, were investigated to evaluate the system ability to remove varying proportion of flowers from apple flower clusters. During boundary thinning the end effector was actuated around the cluster boundary while center thinning involved end-effector actuation only at the cluster centroid for a fixed duration of 2 seconds. The boundary thinning approach thinned 67.2% of flowers from the targeted clusters with a cycle time of 9.0 seconds per cluster, whereas center thinning approach thinned 59.4% of flowers with a cycle time of 7.2 seconds per cluster. When commercially adopted, the proposed system could help address problems faced by apple growers with current hand, chemical, and mechanical blossom thinning approaches.