Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear Two-point Correlation Functions

TL;DR

This paper presents a detailed cosmic shear analysis from the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey, providing cosmological constraints consistent with other methods but showing a slight tension with Planck CMB results.

Contribution

First cosmological analysis using the full three-year Hyper Suprime-Cam shear catalog with rigorous systematics testing and calibration of photometric redshift errors.

Findings

Measured $S_8=0.769_{-0.034}^{+0.031}$ for flat $ m extLambda$CDM.

Found a $2\sigma$ tension with Planck-2018 CMB results.

Confirmed consistency with Fourier space cosmic shear and 3x2pt analyses.

Abstract

We perform a blinded cosmology analysis with cosmic shear two-point correlation functions (2PCFs) measured from more than 25 million galaxies in the Hyper Suprime-Cam three-year shear catalog in four tomographic redshift bins ranging from 0.3 to 1.5. After conservative masking and galaxy selection, the survey covers 416 deg$^2$ of the northern sky with an effective galaxy number density of 15 arcmin$^{-2}$ over the four redshift bins. The 2PCFs adopted for cosmology analysis are measured in the angular range: $7.1 < \theta/{\rm arcmin} < 56.6$ for $\xi_+$ and $31.2 <\theta/{\rm arcmin} < 248$ for $\xi_-$, with a total signal-to-noise ratio of 26.6. We apply a conservative, wide, flat prior on the photometric redshift errors on the last two tomographic bins, and the relative magnitudes of the cosmic shear amplitude across four redshift bins allow us to calibrate the photometric redshift errors. With this flat prior on redshift errors, we find $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.256_{-0.044}^{+0.056}$ and $S_8\equiv \sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3}=0.769_{-0.034}^{+0.031}$ (both 68\% CI) for a flat $\Lambda$ cold dark matter cosmology. We find, after unblinding, that our constraint on $S_8$ is consistent with the Fourier space cosmic shear and the 3$\times$2pt analyses on the same HSC dataset. We carefully study the potential systematics from astrophysical and systematic model uncertainties in our fiducial analysis using synthetic data, and report no biases (including projection bias in the posterior space) greater than $0.5\sigma$ in the estimation of $S_8$. Our analysis hints that the mean redshifts of the two highest tomographic bins are higher than initially estimated. In addition, a number of consistency tests are conducted to assess the robustness of our analysis. Comparing our result with Planck-2018 cosmic microwave background observations, we find a ~$2\sigma$ tension for the $\Lambda$CDM model.