The logical strength of minimal bad arrays
Anton Freund, Fedor Pakhomov, Giovanni Sold\`a

TL;DR
This paper explores the logical strength of the minimal bad array lemma in the theory of better quasi orders, revealing its equivalence to a significant set existence principle in reverse mathematics.
Contribution
It establishes that the minimal bad array lemma is equivalent to -comprehension over \u03a4, highlighting its logical strength.
Findings
Minimal bad array lemma is equivalent to -comprehension.
The lemma's strength is characterized within reverse mathematics.
It connects combinatorial principles to logical set existence axioms.
Abstract
This paper studies logical aspects of the notion of better quasi order, which has been introduced by C. Nash-Williams (Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1965 & 1968). A central tool in the theory of better quasi orders is the minimal bad array lemma. We show that this lemma is exceptionally strong from the viewpoint of reverse mathematics, a framework from mathematical logic. Specifically, it is equivalent to the set existence principle of -comprehension, over the base theory .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Advanced Algebra and Logic
