Don't believe the hype(r): The Yellow Supergiants of Westerlund 1
Emma R. Beasor, Nathan Smith, Jennifer E. Andrews

TL;DR
This study reclassifies six yellow hypergiant candidates in Westerlund 1 as normal yellow supergiants, challenging previous assumptions about their evolutionary stage and suggesting complex formation scenarios.
Contribution
It provides spectroscopic evidence that these candidates are not YHGs but YSGs, and discusses implications for cluster age and stellar evolution models.
Findings
Candidates are normal YSGs, not YHGs.
Westerlund 1 is an older, multi-age cluster.
High YSG/RSG ratio is difficult to explain with simple models.
Abstract
Yellow hypergiants (YHGs) are often presumed to represent a transitional post-red supergiant (RSG) phase for stars 30-40 \msun. Here we present visual-wavelength echelle spectra of six YHG candidates in the Galactic cluster Westerlund 1, and we compare them to known YHGs, IRC +10420 and Hen3-1979. We find that the six YHG candidates do not exhibit any metallic emission lines, nor do they show strong H emission, and as such do not meet the criteria necessary to be classified as YHGs. In conjunction with their moderate luminosities of \logl = 4.7-5.4 estimated from optical/infrared photometry, we suggest instead that they are normal yellow supergiants (YSGs) with more modest initial masses around 15-20 \msun. This adds additional support to the hypothesis that Wd1 is a multi-age cluster with an older age than previously assumed, and is not a 5 Myr old cluster caught at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
