The Subspace Flatness Conjecture and Faster Integer Programming

TL;DR

This paper proves a near-optimal bound on the subspace flatness conjecture, leading to faster algorithms for integer programming and improved bounds on flatness constants.

Contribution

It resolves the Subspace Flatness Conjecture up to a constant in the exponent and derives faster integer programming algorithms and better flatness bounds.

Findings

Proves $( \, ())$ bound on the covering radius.

Develops a $(())^{O()}$-time randomized algorithm for integer programming.

Improves the flatness constant to $O(n ())$.

Abstract

In a seminal paper, Kannan and Lov\'asz (1988) considered a quantity $\mu_{KL}(\Lambda,K)$ which denotes the best volume-based lower bound on the covering radius $\mu(\Lambda,K)$ of a convex body $K$ with respect to a lattice $\Lambda$. Kannan and Lov\'asz proved that $\mu(\Lambda,K) \leq n \cdot \mu_{KL}(\Lambda,K)$ and the Subspace Flatness Conjecture by Dadush (2012) claims a $O(\log(2n))$ factor suffices, which would match the lower bound from the work of Kannan and Lov\'asz. We settle this conjecture up to a constant in the exponent by proving that $\mu(\Lambda,K) \leq O(\log^{3}(2n)) \cdot \mu_{KL} (\Lambda,K)$. Our proof is based on the Reverse Minkowski Theorem due to Regev and Stephens-Davidowitz (2017). Following the work of Dadush (2012, 2019), we obtain a $(\log(2n))^{O(n)}$-time randomized algorithm to solve integer programs in $n$ variables. Another implication of our main result is a near-optimal flatness constant of $O(n \log^{2}(2n))$, improving on the previous bound of $O(n^{4/3} \log^{O(1)} (2n))$.