A note on retrodiction and machine evolution
Gustavo Caetano-Anoll\'es

TL;DR
This paper discusses how retrodiction methods, combined with molecular structure analysis, can trace the evolutionary development of complex biomolecular machines and communication systems over geological timescales.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for using retrodiction and structural data to reconstruct the evolutionary timeline of molecular innovations in biology.
Findings
RNA and protein structures reveal gradual evolutionary innovations
Molecular machines like ribosomes evolved through accretion models
Enzymes and RNA originated at different times supporting hierarchical complexity
Abstract
Biomolecular communication demands that interactions between parts of a molecular system act as scaffolds for message transmission. It also requires an evolving and organized system of signs - a communicative agency - for creating and transmitting meaning. Here I explore the need to dissect biomolecular communication with retrodiction approaches that make claims about the past given information that is available in the present. While the passage of time restricts the explanatory power of retrodiction, the use of molecular structure in biology offsets information erosion. This allows description of the gradual evolutionary rise of structural and functional innovations in RNA and proteins. The resulting chronologies can also describe the gradual rise of molecular machines of increasing complexity and computation capabilities. For example, the accretion of rRNA substructures and ribosomal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms · Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
