True superconductivity at near ambient temperature has not been confirmed by Dasenbrock-Gammon, et. al. Nature (2023)
Srinivas Sridhar

TL;DR
This paper critically evaluates a recent claim of near ambient temperature superconductivity in N-doped lutetium hydride, concluding that the evidence does not confirm true superconductivity at such conditions.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous analysis showing that the claimed superconductivity evidence in the recent study is unsubstantiated.
Findings
No conclusive evidence of superconductivity at near ambient temperature
The experimental data do not support the claim of true superconductivity
The study emphasizes the need for more rigorous verification methods
Abstract
The paper by Dasenbrock-Gammon, et. al. Nature (2023), does not present evidence for true superconductivity at near ambient temperature in a N-doped lutetium hydride system.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
