Deep Anomaly Detection on Tennessee Eastman Process Data
Fabian Hartung, Billy Joe Franks, Tobias Michels, Dennis Wagner,, Philipp Liznerski, Steffen Reithermann, Sophie Fellenz, Fabian Jirasek, Maja, Rudolph, Daniel Neider, Heike Leitte, Chen Song, Benjamin Kloepper, Stephan, Mandt, Michael Bortz, Jakob Burger, Hans Hasse

TL;DR
This paper evaluates modern deep learning-based unsupervised anomaly detection methods on the Tennessee Eastman process dataset, providing insights to guide industrial application choices.
Contribution
It offers the first comprehensive analysis of deep anomaly detection methods on this benchmark dataset, aiding practical industrial deployment.
Findings
Deep learning methods outperform traditional approaches in anomaly detection accuracy.
Certain models show robustness across different types of process anomalies.
The study identifies key factors influencing detection performance.
Abstract
This paper provides the first comprehensive evaluation and analysis of modern (deep-learning) unsupervised anomaly detection methods for chemical process data. We focus on the Tennessee Eastman process dataset, which has been a standard litmus test to benchmark anomaly detection methods for nearly three decades. Our extensive study will facilitate choosing appropriate anomaly detection methods in industrial applications.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFault Detection and Control Systems · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Advanced Data Processing Techniques
MethodsTest
