Pretty good measurement for bosonic Gaussian ensembles

TL;DR

This paper provides an explicit, efficiently computable Gaussian description of the pretty good measurement for bosonic Gaussian ensembles, with applications in quantum information processing and experimental implementation.

Contribution

It offers an alternative proof of Gaussianity for the pretty good measurement and introduces a Gaussian description of the measurement and instrument, including error analysis.

Findings

Explicit Gaussian form of the pretty good measurement derived

Post-measurement state remains Gaussian under certain conditions

Measurement can be practically implemented in quantum optics labs

Abstract

The pretty good measurement is a fundamental analytical tool in quantum information theory, giving a method for inferring the classical label that identifies a quantum state chosen probabilistically from an ensemble. Identifying and constructing the pretty good measurement for the class of bosonic Gaussian states is of immediate practical relevance in quantum information processing tasks. Holevo recently showed that the pretty good measurement for a bosonic Gaussian ensemble is a bosonic Gaussian measurement that attains the accessible information of the ensemble (IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 66(9):5634-564, 2020). In this paper, we provide an alternate proof of Gaussianity of the pretty good measurement for a Gaussian ensemble of multimode bosonic states, with a focus on establishing an explicit and efficiently computable Gaussian description of the measurement. We also compute an explicit form of the mean square error of the pretty good measurement, which is relevant when using it for parameter estimation. Generalizing the pretty good measurement is a quantum instrument, called the pretty good instrument. We prove that the post-measurement state of the pretty good instrument is a faithful Gaussian state if the input state is a faithful Gaussian state whose covariance matrix satisfies a certain condition. Combined with our previous finding for the pretty good measurement and provided that the same condition holds, it follows that the expected output state is a faithful Gaussian state as well. In this case, we compute an explicit Gaussian description of the post-measurement and expected output states. Our findings imply that the pretty good instrument for bosonic Gaussian ensembles is no longer merely an analytical tool, but that it can also be implemented experimentally in quantum optics laboratories.