Active Learning and Bayesian Optimization: a Unified Perspective to Learn with a Goal

TL;DR

This paper unifies Bayesian optimization and active learning under a common framework, formalizing their synergy through shared principles and criteria, and demonstrating their effectiveness across various benchmark problems.

Contribution

It introduces a formalized unified perspective on Bayesian optimization and active learning, highlighting their dualism and synergy through a common set of principles and criteria.

Findings

Unified framework for Bayesian optimization and active learning.

Mapping of infill and learning criteria demonstrating their analogy.

Performance analysis of schemes on benchmark problems.

Abstract

Science and Engineering applications are typically associated with expensive optimization problems to identify optimal design solutions and states of the system of interest. Bayesian optimization and active learning compute surrogate models through efficient adaptive sampling schemes to assist and accelerate this search task toward a given optimization goal. Both those methodologies are driven by specific infill/learning criteria which quantify the utility with respect to the set goal of evaluating the objective function for unknown combinations of optimization variables. While the two fields have seen an exponential growth in popularity in the past decades, their dualism and synergy have received relatively little attention to date. This paper discusses and formalizes the synergy between Bayesian optimization and active learning as symbiotic adaptive sampling methodologies driven by common principles. In particular, we demonstrate this unified perspective through the formalization of the analogy between the Bayesian infill criteria and active learning criteria as driving principles of both the goal-driven procedures. To support our original perspective, we propose a general classification of adaptive sampling techniques to highlight similarities and differences between the vast families of adaptive sampling, active learning, and Bayesian optimization. Accordingly, the synergy is demonstrated mapping the Bayesian infill criteria with the active learning criteria, and is formalized for searches informed by both a single information source and multiple levels of fidelity. In addition, we provide guidelines to apply those learning criteria investigating the performance of different Bayesian schemes for a variety of benchmark problems to highlight benefits and limitations over mathematical properties that characterize real-world applications.