No evidence for absence of solar dynamo synchronization
F. Stefani, J. Beer, T. Weier

TL;DR
This study analyzes millennial cosmogenic radionuclide data to investigate whether the solar dynamo is synchronized by planetary tidal forces, finding evidence supporting a stable 11.07-year cycle linked to Venus-Earth-Jupiter spring tides.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of radionuclide data supporting the hypothesis of planetary tidal synchronization of the solar dynamo, challenging previous claims of absence.
Findings
Radionuclide data show a stable 11.07-year solar cycle.
Evidence suggests synchronization by Venus-Earth-Jupiter spring tides.
Supports the planetary tidal synchronization hypothesis.
Abstract
Context: The old question of whether the solar dynamo is synchronized by the tidal forces of the orbiting planets has recently received renewed interest, both from the viewpoint of historical data analysis and in terms of theoretical and numerical modelling. Aims: We aim to contribute to the solution of this longstanding puzzle by analyzing cosmogenic radionuclide data from the last millennium. Methods: We reconsider a recent time-series of C-inferred sunspot data and compare the resulting cycle minima and maxima with the corresponding conventional series down to 1610 A.D., enhanced by Schove's data before that time. Results: We find that, despite recent claims to the contrary, the C-inferred sunspot data are well compatible with a synchronized solar dynamo, exhibiting a relatively phase-stable period of 11.07 years, which points to a synchronizing role of the spring tides…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Astro and Planetary Science · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
