Linearized Integrated Microwave Photonic Circuit for Filtering and Phase Shifting
Gaojian Liu, Kaixuan Ye, Okky Daulay, Qinggui Tan, Hongxi Yu, and, David Marpaung

TL;DR
This paper presents a reconfigurable integrated microwave photonic circuit capable of high-extinction filtering and tunable phase shifting, combining multi-functionality and linearization for high-performance RF applications.
Contribution
The work demonstrates a novel integrated circuit that achieves reconfigurable RF functions with high linearity and performance, advancing integrated microwave photonics.
Findings
Achieved >50dB notch filtering over 6-16 GHz
Realized 2π tunable phase shifting over 12-20 GHz
On-chip linearization yields >120dB·Hz^{4/5} dynamic range
Abstract
Photonic integration, advanced functionality, reconfigurability, and high RF performance are key features in integrated microwave photonic systems that are still difficult to achieve simultaneously. In this work, we demonstrate an integrated microwave photonic circuit that can be reconfigured for two distinct RF functions, namely, a tunable notch filter and a phase shifter. We achieved 50dB high-extinction notch filtering over 6-16 GHz and 2 continuously tunable phase shifting over 12-20 GHz frequencies. At the same time, we implemented an on-chip linearization technique to achieve a spurious-free dynamic range of more than 120 for both functions. Our work combines multi-functionality and linearization in one photonic integrated circuit, and paves the way to reconfigurable RF photonic front-ends with very high performance.
| RF frequencies | Fundamental to IMD3 ratio | SFDR of the notch filter with linearization (without linearization) |
| GHz | dB | dBHz4/5 (dBHz2/3) |
| 8 | 63.8 | 122.6 (102.8) |
| 9 | 64 | 122.3 (103.7) |
| 10 | 63.2 | 123.5 (102.5) |
| 16 | 61.6 | 122.6 (103.5) |
| Notch frequencies | 6 GHz | 12 GHz | 15 GHz |
| SFDR | 123.2 dBHz4/5 | 122.3 dBHz4/5 | 123.6 dBHz4/5 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems · Optical Network Technologies · Photonic and Optical Devices
††thanks: These authors contributed equally††thanks: These authors contributed equally
Linearized Integrated Microwave Photonic Circuit for Filtering and Phase Shifting
Gaojian Liu
Nonlinear Nanophotonics Group, MESA+ Institute of Nanotechnology,
University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
China Academy of Space Technology (Xi’an), Xi’an, China
Kaixuan Ye
Nonlinear Nanophotonics Group, MESA+ Institute of Nanotechnology,
University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
Okky Daulay
Nonlinear Nanophotonics Group, MESA+ Institute of Nanotechnology,
University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
Qinggui Tan
China Academy of Space Technology (Xi’an), Xi’an, China
Hongxi Yu
China Academy of Space Technology (Xi’an), Xi’an, China
David Marpaung
Nonlinear Nanophotonics Group, MESA+ Institute of Nanotechnology,
University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
Abstract
Photonic integration, advanced functionality, reconfigurability, and high RF performance are key features in integrated microwave photonic systems that are still difficult to achieve simultaneously. In this work, we demonstrate an integrated microwave photonic circuit that can be reconfigured for two distinct RF functions, namely, a tunable notch filter and a phase shifter. We achieved 50 dB high-extinction notch filtering over 6-16 GHz and 2 continuously tunable phase shifting over 12-20 GHz frequencies. At the same time, we implemented an on-chip linearization technique to achieve a spurious-free dynamic range of more than 120 for both functions. Our work combines multi-functionality and linearization in one photonic integrated circuit, and paves the way to reconfigurable RF photonic front-ends with very high performance.
Introduction
The development of cognitive and intelligent radio frequency (RF) systems calls for RF front-ends with programmable multiple functions Baylis2014solving ; Islam2020diode . Microwave photonic (MWP) circuits with high bandwidth and flexible reconfigurability can play an important role in those modern RF systems capmany2007microwave ; marpaung2019integrated ; Zhu2020Broadband . A number of approaches have been proposed to achieve programmable RF photonic circuits. Functionalities including filtering fandino2017monolithic ; liu2020integrated ; daulay2020chip ; Chen2023Multiband ; tao2021hybrid , phase shifting chew2022Inline ; porzi2018photonic ; McKay2019Brillouin ; lin2020high ; chew2019integrated , and beamforming zhu2020silicon ; Romero2022high ; Lin2022low have been realized in application-specific photonic integrated circuits (PIC) that can achieve high performance. Another approach is to create general-purpose integrated MWP circuits that can be configured for a high number of functionalities. These circuits have been demonstrated in the form of waveguide mesh or micro-disk resonator array zhuang2015programmable ; perez2017multipurpose ; bogaerts2020 ; zhang2020photonic . Finally, cascaded MWP systems that can simultaneously perform notch filtering and phase shifting have also been demonstrated in Nguyen2016 ; Xue2012 .
To be relevant for real applications, MWP circuits need to be more than just programmable. Sufficient RF performance such as low noise figure and high spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR) is also required so that they can be placed at the beginning of the RF front-end chain, where the broad bandwidth is most needed.
However, to date, most demonstrated integrated MWP systems are plagued by poor SFDR tao2021hybrid ; fandino2017monolithic ; Yao2022silicon ; LiuY2022tunable . There is an opportunity to circumvent this problem by implementing linearization techniques wu2019multi ; Wang2022high ; liu2021integrated . But only very recently can the RF photonic functionality and linearization be simultaneously achieved in the same system, for example in fiber-based phase shifters bai2021large , or in a chip-based programmable filter daulay2022ultrahigh . Extending this concept to the multi-functional circuit will be important for the MWP field.
In this work, we present a reconfigurable integrated MWP circuit that can perform two distinct functionalities, i.e., a tunable notch filter and a 2-range phase shifter, while maintaining an ultrahigh SFDR. The tunable notch filter function can achieve rejection of more than 50 dB with a 3-dB bandwidth of 315 MHz from 6 to 16 GHz. In the meantime, the tunable phase shifter function can realize 2 continuous tuning range from 12 to 20 GHz. Moreover, both functions can provide a SFDR larger than 120 . This work shows the important first step towards high-performance integrated MWP subsystems with a large number of RF functions.
Results
Reconfigurable Integrated MWP Circuit
The concept of our reconfigurable integrated MWP circuit is illustrated in Fig. 1. It can serve as a notch filter or a phase shifter, with different configurations. By manipulating the phases and amplitudes of multi-order optical sidebands independently, both functionalities can also exhibit ultrahigh dynamic range.
The multi-functional integrated MWP circuit is fabricated with the Si3N4 TriPleX process roeloffzen2018low ; worhoff2015triplex . Fig. 1(a) shows the micrograph of the chip. It consists of two spectral de-interleavers, a tunable attennuator, a phase shifter, and an array of all-pass ring resonators, as illustrated in Fig. 1(b). The spectral de-interleavers are implemented with an asymmetric Mach Zehnder interferometer (aMZI) loaded with 3 ring resonators luo2010high , exhibiting flat-top complementary filter response with free spectral range (FSR) of 160 GHz liu2021integrated . The array of all-pass ring resonators (FSR of 50 GHz) between the two de-interleavers are with tunable coupling ratio and round trip phase that can be controlled via thermo-optic tuning. By applying different voltages to the microheaters, this chip can be configured as a notch filter or a phase shifter while keeping an ultrahigh SFDR, as indicated in Fig. 1(c) and (d).
The signal processing of both functionalities follows a similar procedure. First, the de-interleaver separates the input optical spectrum into two paths. The attenuator and phase shifter in the upper path change the relative phase and amplitude between the two paths for wideband spectrum shaping. In the lower path, an array of all-pass ring resonators performs narrowband phase and amplitude tailoring with high precision. The signals in the two paths are then recombined and directly coupled out of the chip, or coupled into the second de-interleaver for further processing. By tailoring the amplitudes and phases of the optical carrier and multi-order sidebands in such a manner, the -order intermodulation distortion (IMD3) from beating products between different optical sidebands can destructively interfere with each other, leading to an ultrahigh dynamic range.
High-rejection notch filter with ultrahigh SFDR
We first configure this multi-functional MWP circuit into a high-rejection notch filter with enhanced SFDR. A phase-modulated optical signal is sent to the programmable photonic chip for spectral shaping. Because of the nonlinearity of the phase modulator, the modulated optical signal consists of multi-order sidebands, among which the -order sidebands have a phase difference. We use the spectral de-interleaver to first separate the optical carrier and lower sidebands from the upper sidebands. Then, the lower sidebands and optical carrier are attenuated to generate the asymmetric double sideband (aDSB) spectrum and simultaneously satisfying the linearization condition daulay2022ultrahigh . Meanwhile, an under-coupled ring resonator imposes a shallow notch at the upper sideband to meet equal amplitude and anti-phase conditions at the notch frequency. After that the signal is recombined, and a high rejection MWP notch filter based on RF interference is created marpaung2013si . Because of the destructive interference between different IMD3 components, the linearity of the notch filter can be significantly improved (See Supplementary Note for more experimental details).
The performance of the linearized MWP notch filter is shown in Fig. 2. To highlight the advantages of our filter, we compared it with a standard single sideband (SSB) modulated MWP notch filter using the same ring response without linearization. Our demonstrated notch filter has a notch rejection of 52 dB and a 3-dB bandwidth of 315 MHz (at the center frequency of 12 GHz), as shown in Fig. 2(a). We also performed the two-tone test to evaluate the linearity of the demonstrated notch filter. The results shown in Fig. 2(b) exhibit an IMD3 suppression of 28.7 dB when the two-tone RF frequency is at 9 GHz with a spacing of 10 MHz. The large suppression of the IMD3 makes the -order nonlinearity dominate, leading to SFDR improvement from 103.8 to 123.6 with a noise floor of -164.5 dBm/Hz, as observed in Fig. 2 (c). Moreover, the filter keeps high rejection and large SFDR during the tuning of the notch frequency as shown in Fig. 2 (d) The filter shows a link gain of -26.3 dB and a noise figure (NF) of 35.8 dB. This moderate gain and NF is because of the partially destructive interference between two -order sidebands (See Supplementary Note for extended measurement results).
2-range phase shifter with ultrahigh SFDR
The chip can also be reconfigured as a 2-range tunable phase shifter while maintaining the ultrahigh dynamic range. To realize the phase shifting function, we first use an external band pass filter (BPF) to remove the lower sideband of the phase-modulated optical signal. We also attenuate the optical carrier with the BPF by positioning the optical carrier at the transition band for the linearization purpose. The preprocessed single-sideband (SSB) optical signal is then coupled into the chip. We separate the optical carrier and the -order sideband from the -order sideband with the spectral de-interleaver. By applying two over-coupled ring resonators at the optical carrier, 2-range phase shift is introduced with negligible amplitude variation. The optical phase shift is then converted to the RF phase shift when the optical carrier beats with the -order sideband at the photodetector (See the Supplementary Note for the experimental setup). To suppress the IMD3 and improve the linearity of the phase shifter, both amplitude and phase conditions between the optical carrier and the -order sideband need to be satisfied (See the Supplementary Note for the linearization method). On the one hand, we adjust the power ratio between the optical carrier and -order sideband by controlling the passband location of the external BPF and the coupling coefficients of the ring resonators. On the other hand, we tune the phase of the -order sideband with an optical phase shifter to satisfy the phase condition, while the MWP phase shifter tuning over the 2 range.
The performance of the demonstrated phase shifter is presented in Fig. 3. We can realize continuous phase tuning over 2 range by adjusting the resonance frequencies of the two over-coupled rings. Because of the relatively flat stopband response of the two cascaded ring resonators, the amplitude fluctuation of the phase shifter is less than 1 dB over the whole 2 range, as shown in Fig. 3 (a). To evaluate the linearity of the demonstrated phase shifter, we also conducted a two-tone test and compared the results with a phase shifter without linearization for the same phase shift (0.6 in this case). As shown in Fig. 3(b), the linearized phase shifter exhibits an improved fundamental to IMD3 ratio of 20 dB. As a result, the SFDR of the phase shifter increases from 105.2 to 121.2 , which are shown in Fig. 3(c). The noise floor of both phase shifters is -146.8 dBm/Hz. The phase shifter exhibits a link gain of -5.8 dB and NF of 33 dB. The NF of the proposed phase shifter is mainly deteriorated by the phase noise to intensity noise conversion of the laser when the optical carrier is attenuated by the external BPF.
Discussion and Conclusion
In this work, we demonstrated a multi-functional integrated MWP circuit that can be reconfigured between a high-rejection notch filter and a 2-range phase shifter. By vectorially manipulating the multi-order optical sidebands, ultrahigh dynamic range over 120 is achieved in both functions. The array of microring resonators and two spectral de-interleavers lead to a versatile circuit, and could potentially unlock even more functionalities apart from filter and phase shifting, for example, true time delay. Moreover, the possibility to realize multiple different functions in one circuit also opens the path to the cascaded integrated MWP system, which would be a major leap towards integrated RF photonic front-ends that can be directly applied in real RF environments.
Currently, the reconfigurable MWP circuit exhibits relatively low link gain and high noise figure. In principle, the link gain can be improved by increasing the optical power to a high power-handling modulator. The strategy for noise figure reduction, on the other hand, is more intricate. The use of the phase modulator in our experiments prevents NF reduction techniques such as low-biasing a Mach-Zehnder intensity modulator daulay2022ultrahigh to be employed. Emulation of such technique using carrier processing by ring resonator has been previously considered daulay2020chip but the power builds up in the high-Q ring used for carrier processing, preventing the effective NF reduction. We believe that achieving simultaneous high link gain and low NF together with the features demonstrated in this work will require an entirely new topology potentially using a more complex interferometric modulator (for example dual-drive or dual-parallel MZM) with on-chip linearization. Several recent works have shown encouraging results in this direction feng2022ultrahighlinearity ; moran2023linearization .
Author Contribution
G.L. and K.Y. contributed equally in this work. D.M. and G.L. developed the concept and proposed the physical system. O.D. designed the photonic circuits, G.L. and K.Y. developed and performed numerical simulations. G.L. and K.Y. performed the experiments with input from O.D.. D.M., G.L. and K.Y. wrote the manuscript with input from Q.T., H.Y. D.M. led and supervised the entire project.
Funding Information
This project is funded by the European Research Council Consolidator Grant (101043229 TRIFFIC) and Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) projects (740.018.021 and 15702).
Supplementary Note: Experimental details
In the supplementary note, we present the experimental details of both the notch filter and the phase shifter. We start from the experimental setups and signal flows. Then, we derive the linearization conditions by manipulating the amplitude and phase of the optical carrier and the multi-order sidebands. Finally, we show extended measurement results of both experiments.
Experimental Setups
The experimental setup for the notch filter is shown in Fig. S1. Light from the low relative-intensity noise (RIN) CW laser (Pure Photonics PPCL550) is set at 1550 nm and 18 dBm. The light is modulated with RF signal via a phase modulator (EOSpace, 20 GHz). Because of the nonlinearity of the phase modulator, higher-order sidebands would be generated along with the -order sidebands. The signal is amplified by a low noise erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA, Amonics) before injected into the chip for signal processing. The on-chip deinterleaver separates the signal into two path, one containing the optical carrier and lower-sidebands and the other one containing upper sidebands. In the subsequent processing, a ring resonator is set at the under-coupling state and creates a notch response at the -order upper sideband. In the meantime, the -order lower sideband and optical carrier is suppressed with the tunable attenuator. After that, signals at two paths are recombined and sent to the photo detector (EMCORE 20GHz) to be converted to the RF domain. Since the 1st-order upper and lower sidebands at the notch frequency are equal in amplitude but have anti-phase. A very deep notch can be formed at that frequency because of the destructive interference in the RF domain. The filter response is measured with the VNA (keysight P9375A). For the SFDR measurement, the phase modulator is driven by a two-tone signal with a spacing of 10 MHz generated by RF signal generators (Wiltron 69147A and Rohde-Schwarz SMP02), and the converted RF signal is measured with an RF spectrum analyzer (Keysight N9000B).
The setup and signal flow of the phase shifter experiment is shown in Fig. S2. Unlike the setup of the notch filter experiment in Fig. S1, we use an external bandpass filter (EXFO XTM-50) to filter out the low sidebands and also introduce 9 dB attenuation to the optical carrier for linearization (as discussed later). Then, the signal is amplified by a low-noise EDFA (Amonics) and injected into the chip. We further use the on-chip deinterleaver to spatially separate the 2nd-order upper sideband from the optical carrier and the 1st-order upper sideband into two paths. For the path with the optical carrier, we apply two cascaded all-pass ring resonators at the over-coupled state to introduce phase shift to the optical carrier. On the other hand, for the path with the 2nd-order upper sideband, we use the thermal-optic phase shifter to create the opposite phase to the 2nd-order upper sideband and use the tunable attenuator to adjust the power ratio between the optical carrier and -order sideband for the best IMD3 suppression. Finally, the signals at two paths recombine and are converted back to the RF domain with the photo detector (APIC, 40 GHz), and the converted RF signal is measured with a VNA (keysight P9375A). The settings of the SFDR measurement of the phase shifter is the same as the notch filter.
Linearization Method
Phase-modulated optical spectrum consists of multi-order optical sidebands which would generate intermodulation distortions in RF domain after photodetection. We manipulate the phase and amplitude of these multi-order optical sidebands to achieve selective destructive interference among the IMD3 terms to improve the linearity of the integrated MWP systems. As the linearization condition of the notch filter has been extensively explained in daulay2022ultrahigh , here we only derive the linearization condition of the phase shifter.
We adopt a two-tone analysis to investigate the main contributors of IMD3 terms and the requirements to suppress them. When the optical carrier is modulated by a two-tone RF signal at frequencies and with a phase modulator, the optical field after the PM can be expressed as:
[TABLE]
Where is the input power, is the optical carrier frequency, is the -order Bessel function of the first kind, and is the modulation index, which can be expressed as: .
To simplify the analysis, we assume that the two-tone RF signal at frequencies and are small signals, we only need to consider up to the 2nd-order sidebands. We assume the attenuation to the optical carrier and -order sideband is and respectively. Then the simplified optical field after the chip can be written as:
[TABLE]
The photo-current of the RF signal detected from the processed optical spectrum can be expressed as
[TABLE]
where is the responsivity of the photo detector, and are the amplitude coefficients for fundamental signal and IMD3 components, which can be written as
[TABLE]
To minimize the IMD3 terms and maximize the fundamental RF signal, the attenuation and phase shift imposed to the optical carrier and -order optical sideband should satisfy the condition:
[TABLE]
If we take small signal approximation and apply Taylor expansion to the Bessel function of the first kind, then the condition in (5) can be simplified as:
[TABLE]
This condition means that the phase shift added to -order optical sideband is the opposite of that of the optical carrier. Moreover, the attenuation imposed to the electrical field of the optical carrier is 3 times of that applied to the -order optical sideband. This means that the power attenuation at optical carrier is 9.54 dB larger than the power attenuation of the -order optical sideband, and the phase shift imposed to the RF signal is .
Extended Measurement Results
To further characterize the performance of our proposed linearized RF notch filter, we extend our measurements of IMD3 suppression and SFDR when the two-tone test frequency and the notch filter frequency are tuned separately. We first fix the notch frequency at 12 GHz and performed two-tone test at 8 GHz, 9 GHz, 10 GHz, and 16 GHz. The results of the IMD3 suppression and the SFDR at different frequencies are listed in Table S1. The IMD3 terms are greatly suppressed and fundamental to IMD3 ratios of more than 61 dB can be achieved in all these two-tone frequencies. Moreover, SFDR of more than 122 dB are observed with improvements around 20 dB compared with nonlinearized states.
We also measured SFDR at a specific frequency (in this case 9 GHz), when the notch response is tuned at 6 GHz, 12 GHz, and 15GHz. The results are listed in Table S2. In all these frequencies the improved SFDR are more than 122 dB. These results further demonstrate that the proposed linearized notch filter has a high linearity and large SFDR in a wide frequency range.
To further characterize the performance of our proposed linearized RF phase shifter, we extend our measurements of IMD3 suppression and SFDR when the two-tone test frequency and the phase shifting are tuned. We performed two-tone test at 16 GHz, 14 GHz with phase shifting of -130*∘, -20∘* respectively. The results of the IMD3 suppression and SFDR are shown in Fig. S3. It is clear that the IMD3 terms are greatly suppressed and the SFDRs keep enhanced close to 120 dB in all combination of two-tone frequency and phase shifting.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1(1) C. Baylis, M. Fellows, L. Cohen, and R. J. Marks II, “Solving the spectrum crisis: Intelligent, reconfigurable microwave transmitter amplifiers for cognitive radar,” IEEE Microwave Magazine , vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 94–107, 2014.
- 2(2) H. Islam, S. Das, T. Bose, and T. Ali, “Diode based reconfigurable microwave filters for cognitive radio applications: A review,” IEEE Access , vol. 8, pp. 185 429–185 444, 2020.
- 3(3) J. Capmany and D. Novak, “Microwave photonics combines two worlds,” Nature photonics , vol. 1, no. 6, p. 319, 2007.
- 4(4) D. Marpaung, J. Yao, and J. Capmany, “Integrated microwave photonics,” Nature photonics , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 80–90, 2019.
- 5(5) D. Zhu and S. Pan, “Broadband cognitive radio enabled by photonics,” J. Lightwave Technol. , vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 3076–3088, Jun 2020.
- 6(6) J. S. Fandiño, P. Muñoz, D. Doménech, and J. Capmany, “A monolithic integrated photonic microwave filter,” Nature Photonics , vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 124–129, 2017.
- 7(7) Y. Liu, A. Choudhary, D. Marpaung, and B. J. Eggleton, “Integrated microwave photonic filters,” Advances in Optics and Photonics , vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 485–555, 2020.
- 8(8) O. Daulay, R. Botter, and D. Marpaung, “On-chip programmable microwave photonic filter with an integrated optical carrier processor,” OSA Continuum , vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 2166–2174, 2020.
