# N=16 magicity revealed at the proton drip-line through the study of 35Ca

**Authors:** L. Lalanne, O. Sorlin, A. Poves, M. Assi\'e, F. Hammache, S. Koyama,, D. Suzuki, F. Flavigny, V. Girard-Alcindor, A. Lemasson, A. Matta, T. Roger,, D. Beaumel, Y Blumenfeld, B. A. Brown, F. De Oliveira Santos, F. Delaunay, N., de S\'er\'eville, S. Franchoo, J. Gibelin, J. Guillot, O. Kamalou, N., Kitamura, V. Lapoux, B. Mauss, P. Morfouace, J. Pancin, T. Y. Saito, C., Stodel, and J-C. Thomas

arXiv: 2302.14382 · 2023-03-01

## TL;DR

This study reports the first measurement of the mass and shell gap of $^{35}$Ca, revealing a significant N=16 magicity at the proton drip-line and confirming $^{36}$Ca as doubly-magic through experimental and theoretical analysis.

## Contribution

First experimental determination of the mass and shell gap of $^{35}$Ca, demonstrating N=16 magicity at the proton drip-line and comparing it with other doubly-magic nuclei.

## Key findings

- Large N=16 shell gap of 4.61 MeV in $^{36}$Ca.
- $^{36}$Ca identified as a doubly-magic nucleus.
- Shell model calculations underestimate the N=16 gap by 840 keV.

## Abstract

The last proton bound calcium isotope $^{35}$Ca has been studied for the first time, using the $^{37}$Ca($p, t$)$^{35}$Ca two neutron transfer reaction. The radioactive $^{37}$Ca nuclei, produced by the LISE spectrometer at GANIL, interacted with the protons of the liquid hydrogen target CRYPTA, to produce tritons $t$ that were detected in the MUST2 detector array, in coincidence with the heavy residues Ca or Ar. The atomic mass of $^{35}$Ca and the energy of its first 3/2$^+$ state are reported. A large $N=16$ gap of 4.61(11) MeV is deduced from the mass measurement, which together with other measured properties, makes $^{36}$Ca a doubly-magic nucleus. The $N = 16$ shell gaps in $^{36}$Ca and $^{24}$O are of similar amplitude, at both edges of the valley of stability. This feature is discussed in terms of nuclear forces involved, within state-of-the-art shell model calculations. Even though the global agreement with data is quite convincing, the calculations underestimate the size of the $N = 16$ gap in 36Ca by 840(110) keV.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2302.14382/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2302.14382/full.md

## References

67 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2302.14382/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2302.14382