Enumerations of some pattern-avoiding Fishburn permutations
Yujie Du, Philip B. Zhang

TL;DR
This paper proves conjectures related to counting specific classes of pattern-avoiding Fishburn permutations, including those avoiding pattern 321 and certain classical patterns of sizes 4 and 5.
Contribution
It confirms two conjectures by Egge and provides enumeration results for Fishburn permutations avoiding particular classical patterns.
Findings
Enumeration of Fishburn permutations avoiding pattern 321 and certain classical patterns.
Proof of two conjectures of Egge regarding pattern-avoiding Fishburn permutations.
Enumeration formulas for these classes of permutations.
Abstract
In this paper, we prove two conjectures of Egge on the enumeration of several classes of pattern-avoiding Fishburn permutations. Our results include enumerating Fishburn permutations avoiding pattern 321 and one of the following three types of classical patterns: a pattern of size 4, two patterns of size 4, or a pattern of size 5.
| Patterns | || | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 321, 1243 | Theorem 2.1 | |
| 321, 2134 | Theorem 2.4 | |
| 321, 1324 | Theorem 2.7 | |
| 321, 1423, 2143 | Theorem 3.1 | |
| 321, 3142, 2143 | Theorem 3.4 | |
| 321, 2143, 3124 | Theorem 3.7 | |
| 321, 2143, 4123 | Theorem 3.8 | |
| 321, 1423, 3124 | Theorem 3.11 | |
| 321, 1423, 4123 | Theorem 3.14 | |
| 321, 3124, 4123 | Theorem 3.17 | |
| 321, 14253 | Theorem 4.1 | |
| 321, 21354 | Theorem 4.3 | |
| 321, 3142 | Lemma 4.2 | |
| 321,132 | Lemma 4.4 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · DNA and Biological Computing · Coding theory and cryptography
**Enumerations of some pattern-avoiding Fishburn permutations **
Yujie Du and Philip B. Zhang111 Email: [email protected] This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 12171362.
College of Mathematical Science
Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, P. R. China
Abstract. In this paper, we prove several enumeration results of pattern-avoiding Fishburn permutations that Egge proposed recently. Our results include enumerating Fishburn permutations avoiding 321 and one of the following three types of patterns: a classical pattern of size 4, two classical patterns of size 4, or a classical pattern of size 5.
Keywords: Fishburn permutations; Fishburn numbers; Pattern avoidance; Fibonacci numbers
AMS Classification 2020: 05A15
1 Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to prove some enumeration formulae, conjectured by Egge [3], of pattern-avoiding Fishburn permutations.
Enumerations of pattern-avoiding permutations have attracted lots of interest. Recall that the reduced form of a permutation on the set with is a rearrangement of by replacing with for without changing the relative order in the permutation. For example, the reduced form of permutation 342 is 231. We say a permutation containing a classical pattern if has a subsequence (of the same length as ) whose reduced form is . A permutation avoiding a pattern means does not contain . We refer the readers to the book of Kitaev [6] for a comprehensive study.
Fishburn permutations are permutations avoiding the Fishburn pattern. A permutation contains a Fishburn pattern, denoted by (see Fig. 1), if has a subsequence with and such that and .
Bousquet-Mélou, Claesson, Dukes, and Kitaev [2] gave bijections between permutations avoiding the pattern and ascent sequences, unlabeled (2+2)-free posets, and linearized chord diagrams. They also showed their generating function is
[TABLE]
Since the enumeration is related to the Fishburn numbers [10, 7, 1, 4], Gil and Weiner [5] call permutations avoiding the Fishburn pattern as Fishburn permutations.
We are concerned in this paper with the enumeration of Fishburn permutations which avoid some classical patterns. Gil and Weiner [5] studied the enumeration of Fishburn permutations which avoid classical patterns of size 3 or 4 in both regular and indecomposable forms. Based on Gil and Weiner’s work, Egge [3] settled one of their conjectures and further studied the enumeration of Fishburn permutations that avoid classical pattern sets of size 3 or 4 by using generating tree techniques. Furthermore, he concluded several conjectures of the pattern avoidance of Fishburn permutations.
Let be some classical patterns. Denote by the set of Fishburn permutations of length which avoid each . We prove an enumeration conjecture of Egge [3, Conjecture 10.17]. Table 1 is a summary of main results of this paper.
The following lemma tells that all the enumeration results discussed in this paper can be classified into two types according to where the smallest letter 1 is placed.
Lemma 1.1**.**
Let . Then either or .
Proof.
We shall prove this lemma by contradiction. Suppose the letter 1 does not stay in the first two sites. Let and . If , then , and would be a copy of 321. If , then must appear to the right of . Therefore, the letters , and would be a copy of the Fishburn pattern . This leads to a contradiction. Thus we have or . ∎
As the enumerations in this paper all involve 321-avoiding Fishburn permutations, we classify the proofs of the enumeration results into two types according to Lemma 1.1 and enumerate them separately. Throughout the paper we shall denote the set by for or 2.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we prove three enumeration results, Theorems 2.1, 2.4, and 2.7, of Fishburn permutations which avoid 321 and a classical pattern of size 4. In Section 3, we consider the enumeration of Fishburn permutations that avoid 321 and two classical patterns of size 4. It is worth mentioning that Theorems 3.11, 3.14, and 3.17 involve the famous Fibonacci numbers. In Section 4, the enumeration results involve pattern avoidance of size 5. We remark that the last two lines of Table 1 have not been found or conjectured before, which will be used to prove Theorems 4.1 and 4.3.
2 Avoiding 321 and a classical pattern of size 4
2.1 Enumerating
The main result of this subsection is as follows.
Theorem 2.1**.**
For , .
The enumeration of can be divided into the following two propositions according to the site where 1 is located in the permutation. The proof of Theorem 2.1 will be given at the end of this subsection after demonstrating the following two propositions.
Proposition 2.2**.**
For , .
Proof.
For , . Thus
For , . Thus .
Next consider . We classify into several cases according to the value of .
- (1)
. To avoid 1243, the letters are certainly in increasing order. In this case, . 2. (2)
. First, avoiding 321 implies the letters appearing after can only be increasing. Let
[TABLE]
be a permutation of , where we label the sites between two letters for our convenience of discussion. For any , we claim that must be in -th site. Otherwise, if is placed in the first site, then would be a copy of ; and if is in the -th site with , then would be a copy of 1243. Therefore, must be in the rightmost site of .
Next, to avoid 1243, the letters appearing after are also in increasing order. Hence is surely of the following form
[TABLE]
Because has possible values, the number of permutations of the above form is . 3. (3)
. The letters are to the right of , then the forbidden pattern 321 implies they are in increasing order. So .
It follows that for ,
[TABLE]
which completes the proof. ∎
Given a permutation , recall that a site of is active if the new permutation of length obtained by inserting into this site is also a Fishburn permutation avoiding pattern .
Proposition 2.3**.**
For , .
Proof.
For , . Thus .
For , . Thus .
For , . Thus
[TABLE]
Next we shall prove for . Let . We classify according to the value of .
- (1)
. To avoid 321, the letters appearing after must be in increasing order. So . 2. (2)
. To avoid 321, the letters can only be increasing. Suppose that
[TABLE]
and consider the number of active sites of inserting . We assert there are two active sites: one is immediately to the right of 1, and the other one is the rightmost site of . If was inserted to the sites except these two, then would create a copy of 1243. Thus either or . Clearly, the number of permutations in such a case is 2. 3. (3)
. Suppose that . Next we proceed to consider the value of .
- (i)
. We claim . Otherwise, would be a copy of 321. Moreover, to avoid 1243, the letters to the right of 1 2 are certainly in increasing order. So
[TABLE] 2. (ii)
. First, the letters are in increasing order in the permutation to avoid 321. Second, are also in increasing order. If not, and the decreasing pair would be a copy of 1243. Third, no letters in can be inserted into . If is inserted into the sites between , say is inserted between and (), then would create a copy of 1243. Now, we just need to consider as a whole part and insert it into
[TABLE]
Indeed, as labeled above, the sites are all available to insert . So the number of permutations in subcase (ii) is . 3. (iii)
. We claim . If , then would be a copy of 321. Whereas if , then would create a copy of . Similar to the discussion in the above paragraph, are in increasing order and no letters in can be inserted into the sites formed to avoid 1243. Thus are in increasing order to the right of . So
[TABLE]
Because of ranging from to , the number of permutations in this subcase is .
For a fixed , the number of permutations of the above three forms in Case (3) is
[TABLE] 4. (4)
. We shall classify according to the value of .
- (i)
. The forbidden pattern 1243 indicates that appearing after 1 3 must be in increasing order. So . 2. (ii)
. Suppose that , where . We first claim . If , then is a copy of . If , then is a copy of 321. So . Moreover, the letters must be in increasing order since they appear to the right of 1 and 3 to avoid 1243.
Indeed, the number of permutations in Case (4) depending on is .
Therefore, for ,
[TABLE]
We have thus proved this proposition. ∎
Proof of Theorem 2.1.
For , we obtain
[TABLE]
∎
2.2 Enumerating
The main result of this subsection is as follows.
Theorem 2.4**.**
For , .
Proposition 2.5**.**
For , .
Proof.
For , .
For , we discuss the value of . We claim when . If the claim is not true, then . To avoid 2134, the letters appearing after must be in decreasing order. In fact, since , there surely exists a forbidden copy of 321, which avoids. Thus as claimed. The proposition holds for is easy to check. Next we proceed to discuss according to the three values of for .
- (1)
. Undoubtedly, the letters which are to the right of must be increasing to avoid 321. So . 2. (2)
. Similarly, to the right of are in increasing order. Suppose that , and we just need to insert to create . It is trivial to see that all the sites are active. So the number of permutations in this case is . 3. (3)
. To avoid 321, the letters are in increasing order. Let
[TABLE]
We just need to insert and into the sites labeled from 1 to to get . First, is surely to the left of to avoid 2134. Second, can not appear in the -th site for because would create a copy of 321. So can only be inserted to the -th site. Further, let
[TABLE]
We should insert into to obtain . Noticed that can be inserted into all the sites. The number of permutations in this case is .
Therefore, for ,
[TABLE]
∎
Proposition 2.6**.**
For , .
Proof.
For , .
For , we discuss the value of . Let . We shall prove or by contradiction. Suppose . First, to avoid 321, the letters are in increasing order. Second, the Fishburn condition forces , otherwise would create a copy of . Furthermore, the forbidden pattern 2134 implies that to the right of must be in decreasing order. However, under our assumption of , we have and we can surely find a copy of 321, a contradiction. So or .
Suppose , where and . Notice is an exceptional permutation in . Next our discussion is divided into three cases according to the value of .
- (1)
. Avoiding 321 implies that to the right of must be increasing. So , in which ranges from 1 to . The number of permutations in this case is . 2. (2)
. Then to the right of are also increasing to avoid 321. Suppose that
[TABLE]
and insert into . Because is a forbidden copy of , the letter can not be inserted into the first site. Actually it can be inserted into the -th site for , totally active sites. At this time ranges from 1 to . So the number of permutations in this case is
[TABLE] 3. (3)
. First, the letters appearing after are in increasing order as avoids 321. Suppose that
[TABLE]
Second, we consider into which sites we can insert and . We claim and can not be located in the site immediately to the right of , since either or is a copy of . Furthermore, must be to the left of . If not, would be a copy of 2134. Next we claim can only be to the right of . Otherwise, would be a copy of 321. Thus can only be in the -th site, and it is easy to check that can be either in the site labeled from 1 to or the site immediately to the left of . There are ways to place and . In view of ranging from 1 to , the number of permutations in this case is
[TABLE]
Therefore, for ,
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Theorem 2.4.
For , , so
[TABLE]
For , we get
[TABLE]
which completes the proof. ∎
2.3 Enumerating
The main result of this subsection is as follows.
Theorem 2.7**.**
For , .
Proposition 2.8**.**
For , .
Proof.
We discuss according to the site where stays. To avoid 1324 and 321, we first show that there are no descents either to the left or to the right of .
- •
If there is a decreasing pair to the left of , then would be a copy of 1324.
- •
If is to the right of , then would be a copy of 321.
We proceed to claim that the letters to the right of must be greater than those to the left of . Otherwise, let be the largest letter to the left of and let be a letter to the right of smaller than . The Fishburn condition forces must be immediately to the left of . Similarly is immediately to the left of and so forth until . Then would be a copy of , which avoids. This proves our claim.
Therefore, all the letters except should be in increasing order. Now suppose that
[TABLE]
Consider where we can insert into to get . Surely the number of permutations in this case is .
Therefore, for ,
[TABLE]
∎
Proposition 2.9**.**
For , .
Proof.
We can check directly for . Suppose . We classify according to the value of for .
- (1)
. The form of permutations in this case is similar to the one in Proposition 2.8, just see two letters as the smallest letter. Suppose that
[TABLE]
and insert . Hence the number of permutations in this case is . 2. (2)
. The condition avoiding 321 means to the right of are in increasing order. So
[TABLE] 3. (3)
. Then we have are in increasing order. Suppose that
[TABLE]
Next we will insert into . We find that all the sites are active. So the number of permutations in this case is . 4. (4)
. The forbidden pattern 321 implies to the right of are in increasing order. Suppose that
[TABLE]
and consider into which sites we can insert and to obtain .
- (i)
If is to the right of , then must be adjacent to . Otherwise let be a letter between them, then would be a copy of 1324, which avoids. Actually, we can consider as a whole part and insert it into all the sites in . The number of permutations in this subcase is . 2. (ii)
If is to the left of , then must be inserted into the rightmost site to avoid 321 and can be inserted into all the sites. The number of permutations in this subcase is .
It follows that the number of permutations when is . 5. (5)
. Avoiding 321 implies to the right of must be in increasing order. Next we consider where are placed.
- (i)
None of the letters in are to the left of . Then we can consider as the smallest letter 1. By Proposition 2.8, the number of permutations in this subcase is . 2. (ii)
Only one letter is in to the left of . We claim the letter must be . If not, suppose is to the left of with . Thus is a copy of 1324, which avoids. Therefore appearing after must be in increasing order and can be inserted into all the sites between 1 and as follows:
[TABLE]
The number of permutations in this subcase is . 3. (iii)
At least two letters in are to the left of . Suppose that
[TABLE]
We claim that are all to the left of in increasing order and they are inserted into the same site between 1 and .
First, the letters to the left of are increasing to avoid 321.
Second, we shall prove are all to the left of . If one or more letters of them are to the right of , then they must be smaller than those are to the left of . Otherwise, we select from the left of and from the right of respectively with . Thus is a copy of 1324, which avoids. Based on this, we let the letter be the largest one to the right of . The letters in to the left of are all greater than . In this case, there are at least two letters to the left of , so . Then and the letter immediately to its right together with would be a forbidden copy of . Therefore there are no letters to the right of .
Third, the letters in to the left of must be inserted into the same site. Take two letters from with , insert into the -th site and into the -th site, then would be a copy of 1324.
In this subcase, can be inserted into all the sites that the left of in increasing order. The number of permutations is .
Consequently, the number of permutations in such a case is
[TABLE]
Therefore, for ,
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Theorem 2.7.
For , we have
[TABLE]
∎
3 Avoiding 321 and two classical patterns of size 4
3.1 Enumerating
The main result of this subsection is as follows.
Theorem 3.1**.**
For , .
Proposition 3.2**.**
For ,
[TABLE]
Proof.
We can check directly for . Let with , we shall discuss according to the value of for .
- (1)
If , then avoiding 2143 implies to the right of must be in increasing order. So . 2. (2)
If , the letters must be in increasing order to the right of to avoid 2143. Suppose
[TABLE]
and insert 2 into . We find that all of the sites labeled from 1 to are available to insert 2. So in this case, the number of permutations is . 3. (3)
If , then both and are in increasing order to avoid 321 and 2143 respectively. Assume that
[TABLE]
and we just need to insert into these sites in increasing order. We find can not be inserted into the site to the left of . If is inserted into site labeled from 1 to , the letters would be a copy of 1423, which avoids. Hence can only be inserted into the sites to the right of .
- (i)
If is inserted into the -th site, we assume that there are letters between and with and there are letters remained to be inserted into the -th site in increasing order. So
[TABLE]
For a fixed , there is only one permutation in terms of the value of . Since ranges from 1 to , the number of permutations in this subcase is . 2. (ii)
If is inserted into the -th site, then
[TABLE]
So in this case, the number of permutations is . 4. (4)
If , due to 321-avoiding condition, the letters must be in increasing order. Thus .
For , we have
[TABLE]
∎
Proposition 3.3**.**
For ,
Proof.
It is trivial to prove for . Let We claim or when . If not, assume that . If 2 is to the left of 3, then is a copy of 1423. If 3 is to the left of 2, the letters is a copy of 321. So or .
- •
. The Fishburn condition forces . Moreover, to avoid 2143, the letters appearing after must be in increasing order. So
[TABLE]
- •
. We assume with and . Notice an exceptional case is . We claim . We shall deduce contradiction by discussing the order of and in . If is to the left of , then is a copy of 1423. Whereas if is to the left of , then is a copy of 321, a contradiction. So . Furthermore, must be immediately to the right of . If not, and the letter immediately to its right together with would be a copy of . Besides, to avoid 2143, the letters appearing after must be in increasing order. So
[TABLE]
Together with the exceptional permutation , the number of permutations in this case is , in which is due to ranging from 2 to .
Therefore, for ,
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Theorem 3.1.
We can check directly for and . For , we get
[TABLE]
∎
3.2 Enumerating
The main result of this subsection is as follows.
Theorem 3.4**.**
For , .
Proposition 3.5**.**
For ,
Proof.
It is easy to show that the proposition holds for . Now we consider . Let with .
- (1)
If , avoiding 2143 forces the letters to the right of must be in increasing order. So . 2. (2)
. First, to avoid 321, the letters appearing after must be in increasing order. Second, to avoid 2143, the letters appearing after and 1 must be in increasing order. Third, to avoid 3142, the letter must be to the right of . If appears to the left of , then would be a copy of 3142, which avoids. So
[TABLE] 3. (3)
If , then to avoid 321, the letters must be in increasing order. So .
Fixing , we can determine a unique permutation. The number of permutations, which depends on ranging from 2 to , is .
Therefore, for , we have
[TABLE]
∎
Proposition 3.6**.**
For ,
[TABLE]
Proof.
It is easy to prove this proposition holds for . For , if has no descents, we get . For with at least one descent, we assume
[TABLE]
where and . Under our assumption, there is at least one letter after . Next we will divide our proof into several cases according to the value of .
- (1)
. To avoid 321, the letters appearing after must be in increasing order. So 2. (2)
. First, to avoid 321, the letters appearing after must be in increasing order. Assume that
[TABLE]
We need to insert into to get . We noticed that the Fishburn condition forces that no letters in can be inserted into the first site. So is the letter immediately to the right of . Second, to avoid 2143, the letters appearing after and must be in increasing order. Furthermore, we claim that must be to the right of . If is inserted into sites labeled from 2 to , then would be a copy of 3142. Actually, must be to the right of in increasing order and
[TABLE] 3. (3)
. Let be the letter immediately to the right of . We claim . If , then must be greater than . Clearly is a copy of , which avoids. So . Furthermore, to avoid 2143, the letters appearing after and must be in increasing order. Therefore,
Fixing and , we can determine a unique permutation. Since ranges from to and ranges from 1 to , the number of permutations is
[TABLE]
Together with the exceptional case , we get
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Theorem 3.4.
The cases when are easy to check. For , we have
[TABLE]
∎
3.3 Enumerating
The main result of this subsection is as follows.
Theorem 3.7**.**
For , .
Proof.
The enumeration of follows similar lines as that of , except for two cases. However, they do not influence the total enumeration. We now consider the two different cases of from that of .
One different case is Case (2) in the proof of Proposition 3.5. Suppose that . In order to avoid 321 and 2143, we have
[TABLE]
and we consider how to insert into in increasing order. We claim that should be inserted into the first site. If not, would be a copy of 3124, which avoids. So the form of in this case is as follows,
[TABLE]
The other one is Case (2) in the proof of Proposition 3.6. Suppose that . Similarly, we need to insert into the sites as labeled below
[TABLE]
If we insert into the sites except the first, then would be a copy of 3124. So must be inserted into the first site, and
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
∎
3.4 Enumerating
The main result of this subsection is as follows.
Theorem 3.8**.**
For , .
Proposition 3.9**.**
For , .
Proof.
It is trivial to show the proposition hold for . Consider . Let . We shall prove . If , there exist and to the right of 1. Avoid 321 implies and are in increasing order, whereas avoiding 4123 implies they are in decreasing order, a contradiction. So either or .
- (1)
If , to avoid 2143, the letters must be in increasing order. So . 2. (2)
If , the forbidden pattern 2143 means are in increasing order. Let
[TABLE]
and we should insert 2 into now. It is easy to check that 2 can be inserted into all the sites, so the number of permutations in this case is .
Therefore, for ,
[TABLE]
∎
Proposition 3.10**.**
For ,
[TABLE]
Proof.
We can directly check this proposition is true for . If , we assume that has the following form . Take as an exceptional case. Next we consider with and . We claim either or . If the claim would not hold, then . We discuss the order of , and to deduce a contradiction. To avoid 4123, can not be in increasing order. However, if contain at least one descent, then and the decreasing pair would be a copy of 321, a contradiction. So either or .
- (1)
. Avoiding the Fishburn pattern forces must be immediately to the right of . Moreover, to avoid 2143, the letters appearing after and must be in increasing order. So 2. (2)
. We claim must be immediately to the right of . If not, let be the letter immediately to the right of instead of , namely or . If , then would be a copy of 321. If , then would be a copy of . So .
Next we consider the relation of and . If , the letter is to the right of and we have determined . If , avoiding 2143 implies the letters appearing after and must be in increasing order. Let
[TABLE]
and we insert into it. We find all the sites are available to insert . So the number of permutations in this case is .
For a fixed , the number of permutations which depends on the value of is Together with the exceptional case , we obtain
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Theorem 3.8.
We can easily prove the cases when . For , we get
[TABLE]
∎
3.5 Enumerating
In this subsection and the following two subsections, the enumeration involves the famous Fibonacci numbers, see A000045 in OEIS [9]. The Fibonacci numbers, denoted by , satisfy initial conditions and recurrence relation for .
It is worth mentioning that, in the enumeration involving Fibonacci numbers, we consider the first letters of of some kind of classifications, which are also the rearrangement of , as a whole part to play the role of 1. In this way, we can reduce the enumeration to those permutations of lower length, which can be turned into the enumeration we have proved before, to facilitate enumeration and induction.
The main result of this subsection is as follows.
Theorem 3.11**.**
For ,
[TABLE]
Proposition 3.12**.**
For , we get
[TABLE]
Proof.
We shall prove by induction on . For we get
[TABLE]
Suppose this equality holds for positive integers less than . We shall prove it holds for as well. We claim or . If not, we have and 2,3 must appear to the right of . If 2 is to the left of 3, then is a copy of 1423. If 3 is to the left of 2, then is a copy of 321. Therefore, . Next we classify into three cases.
- (1)
. 2. (2)
with and . We claim and . First, we prove . If , we consider the order of and . Avoiding 321 implies is to the left of . But at this time, the letters would be a copy of 1423. So . Second, we prove . If , then would be a copy of . Now we have shown that the first letters of are . We can check that any pair or triple from them can not be parts of the copy of 321,1423,3124 and . The first letters, as a whole, can play the role of 1 as the minimum letter in any copy of 321,1423,3124 and . So, by the induction hypothesis, the number of permutations in this case is
[TABLE] 3. (3)
. The Fishburn condition forces . Similar to the above case, we can treat 1,3,2 as one letter to play the role of 1. The number of permutations in this case is
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
where the third equality follows from a property of Fibonacci numbers. For more properties of Fibonacci numbers, see [8, Chapter 1]. ∎
Proposition 3.13**.**
For ,
[TABLE]
Proof.
Suppose We claim the value of can be chosen from . If not, we assume that . There are at least two letters less than to the right of and they can not contain descents to avoid 321. Next suppose
[TABLE]
and consider which site after 1 we can insert into. If is inserted into the first site, then would be a copy of 1423. Whereas if is inserted into those sites to the right of 2, then would be a copy of 3124, which is a contradiction. So either or .
- (1)
. The letters 2,1 can be as one letter to play the role of 1. The number of permutations in this case is
[TABLE] 2. (2)
. First we have . If there is a letter to the right of 2, then is a copy of 3124. Second, avoiding 321 forces to the left of 2 must be in increasing order. So
[TABLE] 3. (3)
. To avoid 321, the letters must be in increasing order. So
[TABLE]
Thus,
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Theorem 3.11.
For , we have
[TABLE]
∎
3.6 Enumerating
The main result of this subsection is as follows.
Theorem 3.14**.**
For ,
[TABLE]
Proposition 3.15**.**
For ,
[TABLE]
Proof.
We first claim or . We shall prove by contradiction. If , then 2 and 3 must be to the right of . To avoid 321, they are in increasing order. However, the letters would be a copy of 1423, a contradiction.
Next we shall prove the equality (1) by induction on . For we have
[TABLE]
So,
[TABLE]
Suppose equality (1) holds for positive integers less than . We shall prove it holds for as well. We classify into two cases according to the value of .
- (1)
If , then 1,2 can be treated as a whole part to play the role of 1. So the number of permutations in this case can be reduced to
[TABLE] 2. (2)
If , then avoiding indicates . Thus the first three letters 1,3,2 can be considered as one letter to play the role of 1. The number of permutations in this case is
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
∎
Proposition 3.16**.**
For ,
[TABLE]
Proof.
We claim or . If not, suppose that . The letters 2,3 are to the right of 1. If they are increasing order, then would be a copy of 4123. Whereas if they are in decreasing order, then would be a copy of 321. Next we classify into two cases according to the value of .
- (1)
If , the letters 2,1 can be seen as one letter to play the role of 1. The number of permutations in this case is
[TABLE] 2. (2)
If , we consider the position of 2.
- (i)
. We can treat three letters 3,1,2 as one letter to play the role of 1. By equality (1), we obtain that the number of permutations in this case is
[TABLE] 2. (ii)
. We claim
[TABLE]
with . First we shall prove by contradiction. We assume and discuss the value of . On one hand, if , the letter 4 is to the right of 2 and would be a copy of 1423. On the other hand, if , then to avoid 321, and must be in increasing order since 2 is to the right of them. Under the assumption of , we have must be to the right of and would be a copy of , which is a contradiction.
Second, suppose that there are letters between 1 and 2. If , then the letter is 4. If , we denote them by with . Next we show that for . The letters to the left of 2 must be increasing to avoid 321. Furthermore, if there exists such that , then is to the right of 2. Thus is a copy of 1423. Let and substitute with , where ranges from 4 to .
The first letters can be seen as one letter to play the role of 1. So
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Theorem 3.14.
We can check directly for . For , we have
[TABLE]
∎
3.7 Enumerating
The main result of this subsection is as follows.
Theorem 3.17**.**
For ,
[TABLE]
Proposition 3.18**.**
For ,
[TABLE]
Proof.
We claim . If , the letters 2,3 and 4 are to the right of . The condition avoiding 321 implies 2,3 and 4 are in increasing order. But would be a copy of 4123, which avoids. So .
We shall prove (2) by induction. For we have
[TABLE]
So,
[TABLE]
Suppose this equality holds for positive integers less than , and we prove it holds for as well. We divide into three cases according to the value of .
- (1)
. We can treat 1,2 as a whole to play the role of 1. So by the induction hypothesis, the number of permutations in this case can be reduced to
[TABLE] 2. (2)
. Then avoiding forces . The first three letters 1,3,2 can be seen the smallest letter. Thus the number of permutations in this case is
[TABLE] 3. (3)
. We have
[TABLE]
First we prove by contradiction. Suppose that . On one hand, if , the letters 4,3,2 create a copy of 321. On the other hand, if , actually , then would be a copy of . So . Second, we have . If not, is a copy of 3124 because 3 appears after 2 and before . Now it just leaves the sites of to the left of 3 undetermined for . To avoid 321, they must be in increasing order.
Thus,
[TABLE]
∎
Proposition 3.19**.**
For ,
[TABLE]
Proof.
We claim . If not, suppose . If 2,3 are increasing, then is a copy of 4123. Whereas if they are in decreasing order, then is a copy of 321. So or . Thus the number of can be classified into two cases according to the value of .
If , we can treat 2,1 as one letter to play the role of 1. The number of permutations in this case can be reduced to
[TABLE]
If , we have First we shall show . If , then would be a copy of 3124. Second, to avoid 321, the letters appearing before 2 must be in increasing order.
Therefore,
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Theorem 3.17.
We can check directly for . For , we have
[TABLE]
∎
4 Avoiding 321 and a classical pattern of size 5
4.1 Enumerating
The main result of this subsection is as follows.
Theorem 4.1**.**
For , we have
[TABLE]
Recall that the direct sum of two permutations and of length and respectively, denoted by , is a permutation of length consisting of followed by (every letter in plus ). For example, .
In order to prove Theorem 4.1, we first enumerate .
Lemma 4.2**.**
For , we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
We shall prove this lemma by induction. One can easily check that the equality (4) holds for . Suppose the equality (4) holds for positive integers less than with . Next we shall prove it holds for as well. We classify into several cases according to the first two letters of permutations in .
- (1)
. Clearly is in . Thus by the induction hypothesis, the number of permutation in this case is . 2. (2)
with . We claim the first letters of are . First, the sequence appearing after must be increasing to avoid 321. Suppose
[TABLE]
and we should insert into to get . Second, the letter can not be inserted into the first site since would be a copy of . Third, can not be inserted into sites labeled from 2 to would be a copy of 3142. It follows that can only be to the right of . Therefore, , where . The number of permutations in this case is . 3. (3)
. Then to avoid 321, the letters appearing after must be in increasing order. Thus . 4. (4)
with . The number of permutations in this case is . 5. (5)
with . We claim
[TABLE]
where . To avoid 321, the letters appearing after must be in increasing order. Now we suppose
[TABLE]
We next insert into to obtain . To avoid 3142, the letter can not be inserted into the sites labeled from 1 to since would be a copy of 3142. Indeed, can only be inserted to the right of . Therefore, in this case, the number of permutations is . 6. (6)
. Avoiding 321 implies the letters appearing after must be in increasing order. So .
Therefore, for , we have
[TABLE]
∎
Proof of Theorem 4.1.
We can directly check that Theorem 4.1 holds for . For , we will classify according to the site where 1 appears.
Let be a permutation in . If , then with . By equality (4), the number of permutations is .
For , we proceed to classify according to the value of .
- (1)
. Then with . Hence, the number of permutations in this case is . 2. (2)
with . First, the letters appearing after must be in increasing order. Let and be two letters chosen from . Second, to avoid 321, the letters appearing before must be in increasing order. If , there is only one space between 1 and 2. If , there are at least two spaces between 1 and . Suppose
[TABLE]
We claim the letters can be inserted into only one site labeled from 1 to in increasing order. Otherwise, suppose there are two letters from inserted into two distinct sites between 1 and , say is to the left of and is to the right of with . Then would be a copy of 14253.
We next insert into to get . There are two subcases to discuss.
- (i)
All the letters are inserted into the -th site. Thus, the first letters of are . Therefore, with . So the number of permutations in this case is . 2. (ii)
The letters are inserted in to two sites: the -th and the -th, where . There are ways to divide into two sites. As has choices, the number of permutations in this subcase is . 3. (3)
. Then appearing after must be in increasing order. Suppose
[TABLE]
where . We can insert and into in the following ways.
- •
is in the first site and is in the second site.
- •
is in the first site and is in the second site.
- •
and are both in the first site in increasing order.
- •
and are both in the second site.
The first three cases are related to . In the last case, and can be inserted in both increasing and decreasing order. Thus the number of permutations when is . 4. (4)
. Then appearing after must be in increasing order. Suppose and we should insert into to get . Actually, all the sites are available to insert . Thus the number of permutations in this case is . 5. (5)
. Then to avoid 321, the letters appearing after must be in increasing order. So .
Therefore, for ,
[TABLE]
∎
4.2 Enumerating
The main result of this subsection is as follows.
Theorem 4.3**.**
For , we have
[TABLE]
Before proving Theorem 4.3, we shall enumerate first.
Lemma 4.4**.**
For , we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
By Lemma 1.1, we make the following classification according to the site letter 1 appears.
- (1)
. To avoid 132, the letters appearing after 1 must be in increasing order. So in this case, . 2. (2)
. We proceed to classify according to the value of .
- •
. The sequence to the right of must be increasing to avoid 132. Thus .
- •
with . Then appearing after must be increasing to avoid 321. Moreover, to avoid 132, the letters appearing after 1 must be increasing and they are to the right of . So .
Therefore,
[TABLE]
∎
For our convenience, we shall denote by the set of the Fishburn permutations of length that avoid both 321 and 21345, and begin with . Denote by the set of those permutations begin with but not .
Proof of Theorem 4.3.
Our proof is by induction. One can directly check the equality (5) holds for . Suppose the equality (5) holds for . We shall prove it holds for as well. Let . If , then with . Thus it follows from the induction that
[TABLE]
Therefore it suffices to prove the following equality
[TABLE]
For the enumeration of , our classification is according to the value of .
- (1)
. Then with . By Lemma 4.4, the number of permutations in this case is . 2. (2)
. Next we proceed to consider the site where 2 appears.
- (i)
Letter 2 is immediately to the right of 1. We have
[TABLE]
where . The number of permutations in this subcase is
[TABLE] 2. (ii)
There is only one letter between 1 and 2 with .
- •
. Then appearing after must be increasing to avoid 21354. So .
- •
. First, to avoid 321, the sequence appearing after must be increasing. Second, avoiding 21354 implies that the sequence appearing after must be increasing and there are no letters in can be inserted into the sites between 4 and . The former is easy to see. As for the latter, if are inserted into one site between 4 and , then would be a copy of 21354. Hence, we can consider as one letter and insert it into the sites that the letters formed. There are ways to insert to get .
Thus, in this subcase, the number of permutations is
[TABLE] 3. (iii)
There are at least two letters between 1 and 2. Then we claim the letters between 1 and 2 are in increasing order with . We shall take and for example to illustrate. First, the letters and appearing before 2 must be increasing to avoid 321. Second, we have If not, appears to the right of 2 and would be a copy of . Third, avoiding forces since would be a copy of 21354 if . For the same reason, we can prove and so forth. Thus the first letters of are . To avoid 21354, the letters appearing after must be in increasing order. So
[TABLE]
where . Therefore, the number of permutations in this subcase is .
It is worth mentioning that the number of those permutations with and but is
[TABLE]
Thus, we have
[TABLE] 3. (3)
with . The number of permutations in this case is
[TABLE]
For permutation begins with , we have with . Thus
[TABLE]
In the following part, we discuss the enumeration of for . Other enumerations for can be reduced to this form. We classify according to the number of letters between 1 and 2.
- (i)
There is only one letter between 1 and 2. Suppose . Then to avoid 321, we have because appears before . Here we consider . The case of is discussed later in (ii). Next we need to consider the arrangement of the remained letters . First, the sequence , the sequence , and the sequence must be increasing to avoid the pattern 321, 321, 21354 respectively. Second, the sequence must be to the right of the increasing sequence to avoid 321. Third, there are no letters in can be inserted into the sites between and . If is inserted into one site between and , then would be a copy of 21354. Hence, we can consider as one letter and thus consider as two increasing sequences, one is of length consisting of letters in the first two sets, the other is of length consisting of . Moreover, we can consider its counting as the number of permutations of the multiset , which is . 2. (ii)
There are at least two letters between 1 and 2. Then we claim the letters between 1 and 2 are consecutive letters from to in increasing order with (notice that was discussed here). First, the letters between 1 and 2 must be greater than and they are increasing to avoid 321. Second, if , the letters would be a copy of . So . Third, we have and so forth. If , then would be a copy of 21354. Thus . Similar to the above, the sequence and the sequence are two increasing sequence of length and respectively. Thus the enumeration can be turned into the number of permutations of the multiset , which is .
Thus,
[TABLE]
where the third equality follows from the hockey stick identity.
For the enumeration of with , we can consider as one letter to play the role of 1, consider as 2 and consider as . Thus
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE] 4. (4)
. Avoiding 321 indicates to the right of must be increasing. So
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
where the forth equality follows from the hockey stick identity.
We have thus proved Theorem 4.3 by induction. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] G. E. Andrews and J. A. Sellers, Congruences for the Fishburn numbers, J. Number Theory , 161 (2016), 298–310.
- 2[2] M. Bousquet-Mélou, A. Claesson, M. Dukes, and S. Kitaev, ( 2 + 2 ) 2 2 (2+2) -free posets, ascent sequences and pattern avoiding permutations, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A , 117 (2010), 884–909.
- 3[3] E. S. Egge, Pattern-avoiding fishburn permutations and ascent sequences, ar Xiv:2208.01484 .
- 4[4] S. Fu, E. Y. Jin, Z. Lin, S. H. F. Yan, and R. D. P. Zhou, A new decomposition of ascent sequences and Euler-Stirling statistics, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A , 170 (2020), 105141, 31.
- 5[5] J. B. Gil and M. D. Weiner, On pattern-avoiding Fishburn permutations, Ann. Comb. , 23 (2019), 785–800.
- 6[6] S. Kitaev, Patterns in permutations and words , Monographs in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011.
- 7[7] P. Levande, Fishburn diagrams, Fishburn numbers and their refined generating functions, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A , 120 (2013), 194–217.
- 8[8] B. E. Sagan, Combinatorics: the art of counting , vol. 210 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics , American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2020.
