On multiplicity-free weight modules over quantum affine algebras
Xingpeng Liu

TL;DR
This paper constructs and analyzes multiplicity-free weight modules over quantum affine algebras, introducing shiftability conditions and computing their highest $\
Contribution
It introduces the shiftability condition and provides a new framework for understanding infinite-dimensional multiplicity-free modules.
Findings
Defined shiftability condition for quantum affine algebras
Constructed infinite-dimensional multiplicity-free weight modules
Computed highest $\
Abstract
In this note, our goal is to construct and study the multiplicity-free weight modules of quantum affine algebras. For this, we introduce the notion of shiftability condition with respect to a symmetrizable generalized Cartan matrix, and investigate its applications on the study of quantum affine algebra structures and the realizations of the infinite-dimensional multiplicity-free weight modules. We also compute the highest -weights of the infinite-dimensional multiplicity-free weight modules as highest -weight modules.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Nonlinear Waves and Solitons
On multiplicity-free weight modules
over quantum affine algebras
Xingpeng Liu
School of Mathematical Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, P. R. China
Abstract.
In this note, our goal is to construct and study the multiplicity-free weight modules of quantum affine algebras. For this, we introduce the notion of shiftability condition with respect to a symmetrizable generalized Cartan matrix, and investigate its applications on the study of quantum affine algebra structures and the realizations of the infinite-dimensional multiplicity-free weight modules. We also compute the highest -weights of the infinite-dimensional multiplicity-free weight modules as highest -weight modules.
Key words and phrases:
Quantum affine algebra, representation theory, multiplicity-free weight modules
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 17B37, 17B10; Secondary: 20G42, 16T20
1. Introduction
Let be the quantum affine algebra (without derivation) associated to an affine Lie algebra over in which is not a root of unity. In this note, we are concerned with infinite-dimensional multiplicity-free weight representations, i.e., all of their weight subspaces are one-dimensional, over . As we shall see, these representations are the basic representations towards to the infinite dimensional modules of quantum affine algebras.
In the classical cases, the multiplicity-free weight representations over finite-dimensional simple Lie algebras, or more general, the bounded weight representations have been extensively studied in [3, 6, 17, 18]. These representations play a crucial role in the classification of simple weight modules of finite dimensional simple Lie algebras (cf. [32]). For the quantum groups of finite type, Futorny-Hartwig-Wilson [16] gave a classification of all infinite-dimensional irreducible multiplicity-free weight representations of type . Recently, the infinite-dimensional multiplicity-free weight representations of the quantum groups of types and were constructed in [10].
As an important class of multiplicity-free weight modules, the -oscillator representations over of types , , , and have been obtained in the works of T. Hayashi, A. Kuniba, M. Okado [19, 25, 26, 27]. Our goal is to construct infinite-dimensional multiplicity-free weight representations of in a general way. For this, associated to each symmetrizable generalized Cartan matrix we introduce a system of equations in a Laurent polynomial ring (essentially, the Cartan part of ) by the shift operators. Call the corresponding generalized Cartan matrix satisfies the shiftability condition if the system of equations has solutions (see Subsection 4.1). One result of this note is that an affine Cartan matrix satisfies the shiftability condition if and only if the relevant Dynkin diagram is one of the types mentioned above (see Theorem 4.2). The solutions allow us to define -module structures on , and to relate the quantum affine algebra structures with the -fold of quantized oscillator algebra. Our method for the construction is parallel with the earlier work concerning -free modules [10]. Namely we can get the multiplicity-free weight modules of by applying the “weighting” procedure to the above modules on . In particular, the -oscillator representations can also be reconstructed.
For the study of weight representations of quantum affine algebras, the concepts of -weights and -weight vectors were proved especially useful, which allow one to refine the spectral data properly in weight representations. For example, we have the classification of irreducible finite-dimensional representations (cf. [7, 9]) and infinite-dimensional weight representation of quantum affine algebras in [20, 33] by highest -weights (Note that their highest -weights are determined by Drinfeld polynomials and rational functions, respectively). In this note, we shall compute explicitly the highest -weight of the -oscillator representations. For the type , the highest -weights of -oscillator representations also were discussed in [4, 5, 29].
This note is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give some necessary notations, and review two presentations of quantum affine algebras. In Section 3 we recall the definition of highest -weight representations. Then we obtain the classification of highest -modules with finite weight multiplicities in general. In Section 4, we introduce the notion of shiftability condition, and present the solutions to the corresponding system of equations, which allow us to study the compatible structures of quantum affine algebras with the -fold of quantized oscillator algebra. In Section 5 the infinite-dimensional multiplicity-free weight modules are constructed. In Section 6, we compute the highest -weight of the -oscillator representations.
Conventions. Let , and be the sets of integers, real numbers and complex numbers respectively, denote by , the set of nonnegative integers by , and the notation stands for the Kronecker symbol in this note.
2. Preliminaries and notations
First, let us recall some necessary notations and two presentations of quantum affine algebras based on [2, 15, 24].
2.1. Affine Kac-Moody algebras
Let be an affine Kac-Moody algebra with respect to the generalized Cartan matrix of type where is an indexed set and is a Dynkin diagram from Table Aff of [24], except in the case of , where we reverse the numbering of the simple roots.
Let (resp. ) denote the set of simple roots (resp. simple coroots) such that . Let and be the root lattice and the set of positive roots of , respectively. Assume that and are the smallest positive imaginary root and a center element of , where and are the numerical labels of the Dynkin diagrams of and its dual, respectively. Let denote the fundamental weights of , i.e., for .
Let be the affine Weyl group of (which is a subgroup of the general linear group of ) generated by the simple reflections . Note that for all . Set . Denote by the subgroup of generated by the simple reflections for . It is a finite group.
Take the nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form on invariant under the action of , which is normalized uniquely by for . Define as the diagonal matrix with . Then for all . Let be the root system of , and let be the set of real roots. For each we set . In particular, write simply for . Then
[TABLE]
Denote by the Cartan matrix of finite type, and let be the associated simple finite-dimensional Lie algebra. Then is a set of simple roots for . Let be the root lattice for , the weight lattice of the euclidean space defined as , where . Then can be naturally embedded into , which provides a -invariant action on by for .
Define the extended Weyl group by . We also have , where , which is a subgroup of the group of diagram automorphisms. An expression for is called reduced if , where and is minimal. We call the minimal integer the length of , and denote it by .
2.2. Quantum affine algebras
The quantum affine algebra in the Drinfeld-Jimbo realization [14, 22] is the unital associative algebra over generated by , , , with the following relations:
[TABLE]
where is not a root of unity and . Here we have used the standard notations:
[TABLE]
In particular, denote by for simplicity.
Let be the commutative subalgebra of generated by . It is clear that each element in is a linear combination of the monomials for In particular, is a central element in . Let (resp. ) denote the span of monomials in (resp. ). Recall has a canonical triangular decomposition . For later use, we note that is graded by in the usually way: .
Let us recall the Hopf algebra structure of with the coproduct , the antipode , the counit defined as follows:
[TABLE]
There exists another presentation of due to Drinfeld [15]. Just like the realizations of the affine Kac-Moody algebras as (twisted) loop algebras, this presentation of is generated by the Drinfeld’s “loop-like” generators.
Consider the root datum with a diagram automorphism of of order . Let be the Cartan matrix of the type , and let be a fixed primitive -th root of unity. Note that if (i.e., is an identity) we have , ; if , then is one of the simply laced types: , , . We use to stand for one representative of the -orbit of on such that for any . Take the set of simple roots and the normalized bilinear form (by abuse of notation) such that if , otherwise for .
The quantum affine algebra (add the central elements ) is isomorphic to the algebra generated by , , and the central elements , subject to the following relations:
[TABLE]
where ’s are the elements determined by the following identity of the formal power series in :
[TABLE]
together with the quantum Serre-Drinfeld relations, whose explicit forms will be not used in this note. One can refer to [15] for more details and to [1, 23] and [11, 12, 13]111The author used the notations , , which are related with , defined in this note by and . for the proof.
Under the isomorphism, we have , for , and . Note that for any positive integers , and from the identity (2.6).
From the relations in Drinfeld presentation, is essentially generated by the generators , , and the central elements (see [12, Proposition 4.25]). Moreover, the quantum affine algebra has a triangular decomposition [8, 9]:
[TABLE]
where (resp. ) is the subalgebra generated by (resp. ), , , and is the subalgebra generated by , , .
3. Highest -weight representations with finite weight multiplicities
In this section, we recall basis notations of representations over quantum affine algebras: weight modules, -weights, and highest -weight modules. Most of the definitions and results in this section are well-known, one can refer to [7, 33].
3.1. Highest -weight modules
We begin with the notion of highest -weight modules. Thanks to the Hopf algebra structure of (inherits from ), the set of all algebra characters of , i.e., all algebra homomorphisms from to , has an abelian group structure, the addition and the inverse are given by
[TABLE]
for any algebra characters , and . Denote this group simply by . Any induces a character in by assigning to for , which is unique up to scalars of , so we still denote it by .
For a -module and , define
[TABLE]
By the defining relations (2.2) . If is nonzero, then we say is a weight of , and is a weight space of weight , a nonzero vector is called a weight vector of weight . If the weight space is finite-dimensional, then is called the multiplicity of the weight . Call a weight module if . Moreover, a weight module is said to be multiplicity-free if for all .
Throughout this note, we assume that the central element acts trivially on a -module. So any weight of a -module is level-one, that is, .
Note that the actions of ’s on a -module commute each other by (2.5) and (2.6). For a weight of with finite multiplicity, we may refine the weight space as
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where is any -tuple of sequences of complex numbers satisfying that and for all , and we associate with a level-one weight by setting for any . Call such a sequence an -weight, the -weight space of if is not zero.
Given an -weight . The defining relations in the Drinfeld presentation imply that is completely determined by the tuple of complex numbers . Note that ’s for are zero. Hence we may write directly without any ambiguity.
Now we can define the highest -weight modules.
Definition 3.1**.**
We say is a highest -weight modules of highest -weight if for some non-zero vector such that for , and for . By , so is unique up to a scalar; we call it the highest -weight vector of .
3.2. The classification theorem: rationality
In this subsection we give the classification of simple highest -weight modules with finite weight multiplicity, which appeared in [33] for untwisted cases.
We say an -weight is rational if there is a tuple of complex-valued rational functions in a formal variable such that for each , is regular at [math] and , and
[TABLE]
in the sense that the left and right hand sides are the Laurent expansions of at [math] and , respectively.
Let be the set of all rational -weights. Then forms an abelian group with the group operation being given by component-wise multiplication of the corresponding tuples of rational functions. In what follows, we do not always distinguish between a rational -weight and the corresponding tuple of rational functions.
Recall from [7, 9] that simple finite-dimensional modules of are highest -weight modules, and their highest -weights are parametrized by the tuples of the Drinfeld polynomials. More precisely, there exists a tuple of polynomials with all having constant coefficient such that satisfies that for ,
[TABLE]
Therefore, the highest -weight of any simple finite-dimensional module is rational.
In general, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 3.2**.**
Let be an irreducible highest -weight module. Then all weight spaces of are finite-dimensional if and only if its highest -weight belongs to .
Proof.
For the non-twisted cases, one can refer to [33, Theorem 3.7] and the references therein. The proof of the twisted cases is essentially parallel to that of the untwisted cases thanks to the triangular decomposition (2.7) of the Drinfeld realization. ∎
4. Shiftability conditions and algebra homomorphisms
In this section, the notion of shiftability condition with respect to a generalized Cartan matrix will be introduced, and the compatible structures of the quantum affine algebras with the -fold of -oscillator algebras are given from the -shiftability condition.
4.1. Shiftability conditions
Given any symmetrizable generalized Cartan matrix . Let be the Laurent polynomial ring over in the variables , i.e., For each , consider the algebra automorphism given by for . For any distinct , we say a pair of Laurent polynomials in is -shiftable if satisfy the equation
[TABLE]
Set for any unit in , and write for simplicity. Define the elements as follows:
[TABLE]
Consider the following system of equations with respect to the variables in :
[TABLE]
In general, this system of equations does not always have solutions. It depends on the choice of the generalized Cartan matrix . Therefore, we can say admits the -shiftability condition when the corresponding system of equations (4.1) has a solution.
By a quick computation, we obtain a family of solutions to (4.1) for of types and .
Example 4.1**.**
* For the type , a pair of Laurent polynomials , where and for each scalar is a solution;*
* For the type , consider the Laurent polynomials and for any scalar . It is easy to check that is a solution.*
In what follows, the -shiftability condition for the generalized Cartan matrices of affine types will be investigated. Now assume that is an affine Cartan matrix as in Section 2. Then we have the first main result in this section.
Theorem 4.2**.**
There exists an -tuple of Laurent polynomials in satisfying the system of equations if and only if is the type or .
The proof of Theorem 4.2 will be given in Appendix A. Here we list all tuples of Laurent polynomials satisfying (4.1) for each affine Cartan matrix in the theorem.
[TABLE]
where . The elements , and the relations in our notations are given as follows for each type:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
By our convention, the Dynkin diagrams of the above four types and the corresponding are the following:
[math] 1$$q$$2$$q$$n-1$$q$$n$$q…
[math]q$$1$$q^{\frac{1}{2}}$${n-1}$$q^{\frac{1}{2}}$$n$$q$$...$$(C_{n}^{(1)})
[math]q^{2}$$1$$q$${n-1}$$q$$n$$q^{\frac{1}{2}}$$...$$(A_{2n}^{(2)})
[math]q$$1$$q^{2}$${n-1}$$q^{2}$$n$$q$$...$$(D_{n+1}^{(2)})
Remark 4.3**.**
One can also consider the shiftability condition for a generalized Cartan matrix in the classical sense. More precisely, consider the polynomial ring , and the algebra automorphisms defined by for all . Denote . Then a similar system of equations in (replace in by ) can be obtained.
4.2. Quantized oscillator algebra and algebra homomorphisms
One interesting application of -shiftability condition is to study the compatible structures of quantum affine algebras of types with the -fold of quantized oscillator algebra.
Fix . The (symmetric) quantized oscillator algebra is the unital associative algebra over generated by four elements , , subject to the relations
[TABLE]
where . Then we have , and , in .
One can easily check the following results.
Lemma 4.4**.**
* There exists a unique -algebra automorphism (an involution) such that , and .
For any and , there exists a family of -algebra automorphisms such that , and .*
Consider the algebra of the -fold tensor product of . Denote the generators of its -th component by , and , which satisfy the above relations. Let be the quantum affine algebra of the type in Theorem 4.2. For convenience, if is the type then we shall deal with instead of from now on.
Fix a solution in Subsection 4.1. We define the algebra homomorphism in the following way: regard and as the images of and respectively under by setting for the type , and otherwise (Here we consider the solution with for the type ), where is defined as in the following proposition for each type. Then the relations (2.3) for holds under since satisfies . In this sense, is a subalgebra of , and for . On the other hand, we choose satisfying that
[TABLE]
for any . The above choice yields the relations (2.1)-(2.4) hold. Then we get the following algebra homomorphisms, which were obtained in [19, 28].
Proposition 4.5** ([19, 28]).**
For a parameter , there exist algebra homomorphisms from to defined as follows:
()**
[TABLE]
In this type, we always read the index as modulo .
()**
[TABLE]
()**
[TABLE]
()**
[TABLE]
where . ∎
5. Multiplicity-free weight modules
In this section, we construct the multiplicity-free weight representations over from the solutions and the algebra homomorphisms in the previous section. Throughout this section, we assume that is the quantum affine algebra of type in Proposition 4.5.
5.1. Module structures on
In order to construct the multiplicity-free weight representations, we first consider the auxiliary -module structures on .
Let us fix some notations here. Note that and are long roots in the type , while both of them are short roots in . In addition, by our assumption, is long, is short in . We define a pair of signs such that , are equal to [math] or , which depends on the length of the roots and for each type, that is,
[TABLE]
Fix a solution , and recall the units ’s for each type, and the shift operators defined in Subsection 4.1. Put . Then we have
Theorem 5.1**.**
Let be a parameter valued in . For an -tuple satisfying that is or , , there exists a -module structure on the algebra for each type defined in the following:
For the type ,
[TABLE]
and , for any .
For other types,
[TABLE]
and , for any .
Proof.
It is easy to check that for each , where is the unit element in . It suffices to show that the actions do hold under the defining relations (2.1)-(2.4). It is clear for the relations (2.1)-(2.2), and the cases that and in the relations (2.3). To check the rest part of (2.3), we first assume . Then we have to show
[TABLE]
If then , , and ; while we have , , and . Both cases imply the above equality holds. When , a direct computation yields the following equalities:
[TABLE]
Then similar arguments for the case that are true. Any tuple satisfying (4.1) and the choice of also guarantee that these actions hold under the quantum Serre relations (2.4). ∎
Denote the above -module by . Note that is finitely -generated instead of -diagonalizable when restricted as a -module. Recall in the construction in Subsection 4.2. Then we have
[TABLE]
In particular, acts trivially on .
Now let us explain the “weighting” procedure mentioned in the introduction. That is, for any -module , we associate a weight module in the following way. Consider the algebra embedding from to by assigning to , , which induces a natural group surjection from the group of characters of to . For any character of , denote by the corresponding maximal ideal of . Extend to a character of by setting , (so , we still denote it by ), then we have
[TABLE]
Define
[TABLE]
where is over all characters of .
Corollary 5.2**.**
For any -module , we have is a weight module, and all its simple subquotients are multiplicity-free.
Proof.
It is clear that is -dimensional and acts it diagonally. In particular, acts by . The first assertion follows from the previous statements, and the -weight space , where means the image of in . Since we have
[TABLE]
the second assertion follows. ∎
Remark 5.3**.**
In fact, the -module is a -analog of the coherent family in the sense of [32]. This “weighting” procedure was first suggested by O. Mathieu in the paper [34].
Now let us study the possible highest weights of when restricted as a -module. Assume that the weight vector of is a highest weight vector for some . Then we have for , which implies that
[TABLE]
The weight is level-one, which is determined uniquely by the values . Therefore, all level-one weights can be seen automatically as weights over . As a result, we can obtain the following result.
Corollary 5.4**.**
Let be a weight of for some . If is a highest -weight, then up to twistings by the automorphisms of , we have
- (1)
for the type , the weight is of the form for some and up to a scalar of ; 2. (2)
for the type , the weight has the form or up to scalars of ; 3. (3)
for the type (resp. ), the weight is defined as
[TABLE]
Proof.
The result can be deduced directly from (5.2). For example, in the type , these equations (5.2) become
[TABLE]
where we denote by for . Let . Then . To solve the equations (5.3), we divide it into two cases: if is not zero, then for ; if is zero, then we assume that is the maximal index such that is zero, then for and for . In the first case, the possible solutions are , for . Then up to twistings by sign automorphisms of , we have the weight is given by
[TABLE]
which is of the form for some . In the second case, for , , and otherwise. Then up to signs, we have the weight is the following:
[TABLE]
which is exactly of the form in (1). So the assertion (1) follows. ∎
All simple subquotients obtained in Corollary 5.4 can be realized as -oscillator representations by using the Fock space representations of and the algebra homomorphisms in Proposition 4.5 (cf. e.g. [25]). In the following subsection, we shall recall the -oscillator representations.
5.2. Realization of multiplicity-free weight modules
Let be the Fock space representation of on which the generators and act as the creation and annihilation operators respectively, and the element corresponds to the number operator, more precisely, for any ,
[TABLE]
In particular, .
Denote this representation by . For any and , we denote by the composition (cf. Lemma 4.4). Then has a new -module structure via .
Definition 5.5**.**
Let be a parameter valued in . We define the representation of on the space via the composition of the algebra homomorphisms defined in Proposition 4.5 and
[TABLE]
where , and .
For any -tuple , we use for the basis vector of . Let be the -th standard vector in with at the -th term and [math] otherwise for . Moreover, set for .
For , note that -module actions of for on , by Definition 5.5, can be written down uniformly as follows:
[TABLE]
for , where is defined in Proposition 4.5 for each type, and for can be read as [math]. Here we remark that the -module actions of on also have the above forms where we understand the indices as (mod ) respectively.
Regard as the subalgebra of via forgetting the actions of the Drinfeld-Jimbo generators indexed by [math] and . One can check that as a -module is a multiplicity-free weight module. In fact, has the following direct sum decomposition:
[TABLE]
For any , denote . Each is an irreducible, multiplicity-free weight -module by the formulae (5.4)-(5.6) as (or ) is not a root of unity.
Fix . Define the algebra homomorphism by for . Then it induces an algebra character by
[TABLE]
Then we have
Proposition 5.6**.**
For , , we have
- (i)
* is a weight module with for any .* 2. (ii)
If , then there exists such that with
[TABLE]
Proof.
It is clear that is a weight module. By (5.6) and the actions of and , which are defined for as follows:
[TABLE]
where and are defined in Subsection 5.1, the relative weight of is given by the right hand side of the equality (5.7). By the above statement, for any . ∎
Consider the following decomposition of :
[TABLE]
For , let satisfy
[TABLE]
For example, and .
Then we have
Proposition 5.7**.**
For any , , we have
- (i)
As a -module, is irreducible for any admissible ; it is a highest -weight module with a highest -weight vector if and only if for some , where
[TABLE] 2. (ii)
As -modules, and are irreducible; they are highest -weight modules with highest -weight vector and respectively whenever . 3. (iii)
As a or -module, is irreducible; it is a highest -weight module with a highest -weight vector whenever .
Proof.
Note that acts trivially on by (5.1). The defining relations (2.5) imply that the actions of , , on commute pairwise. Hence is an -weight -module. It is clear that is closed under the action of . The irreducibility of can be checked by the actions (5.4)-(5.6). Note that for (resp. ), is finite dimensional for (resp. ). As a -module (ignore the actions of ) is a highest weight module iff , and the corresponding highest weight vector can be chosen as (5.10), which is also a highest -weight vector by weight consideration.
For , the actions of and are given by
[TABLE]
and , where is defined as follows:
[TABLE]
and . Similarly, we can obtain the actions of and . Therefore, the assertions (ii) and (iii) can be deduced directly from the above actions. ∎
6. Highest -weights
In this section, we focus on the irreducible highest -weight representations constructed in the previous section, and compute their highest -weights explicitly.
6.1. Multiplicity-free highest -weight modules
Fix . Let be the -module defined as follows (see also [29]):
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where and . From the actions (5.4)-(5.6), is just the twisting of the module where , by the automorphism of sending to , along with other Drinfeld-Jimbo generators fixed. Denote as the -th irreducible component of , i.e., .
Let be one of the types in Proposition 4.5 except . Let be the -module defined as (see [27]):
[TABLE]
where , and . Here ’s are defined in Subsection 5.1. This module can be obtained from with and by the automorphism of defined as
[TABLE]
and other generators are fixed. For the type , denote the irreducible components of -module by , for convenience.
Lemma 6.1**.**
Let be an irreducible highest -weight -module with . If for some then satisfies that
[TABLE]
where satisfy that and .
Proof.
Suppose that is a nonzero -weight vector of . Note that spans the weight space . If , then there exist such that is nonzero, and such that
[TABLE]
Consider the actions of , on (6.2). The defining relations (2.5) imply that
[TABLE]
for any . Since for , we have for any . Take the series , we have
[TABLE]
Hence has the rational form (6.1). ∎
6.2. Highest -weights
Let us first study some properties of the Weyl group and the description of the root vectors of quantum affine algebras, which will enable us to compute the highest -weight explicitly.
Lemma 6.2**.**
Let , and .
- (1)
If , then . 2. (2)
If , then .
Proof.
Both (1) and (2) are easy facts deduced from and
[TABLE]
respectively. ∎
Recall the braid group operators associated to introduced by Lusztig [30]. For each simple reflection , there is an algebra automorphism of defined by
[TABLE]
where and . Then , where is the -linear anti-automorphism of sending to , to for . For any , define by and .
For later use, we list some well-known properties of braid group operators (cf. [31, 1]). Choose one element . If is a reduced expression of , then the automorphism of is independent on the choice of the reduced expression of . In particular, one reduced expression can be transformed to another by a finite sequence of braid relations. If then . Moreover, if is a reduced expression and , then we have .
Remark 6.3**.**
For , put
* In the type , a reduced expression of , can be chosen as:*
[TABLE]
where is the diagram automorphism of sending to for (cf. **[21, Subsection 3.3]**).
* In the type , the reduced expression of can be chosen (cf. [11, Corollary 4.2.4]) as:*
[TABLE]
* In the type (resp. ), the reduced expressions of and can be chosen as:*
[TABLE]
respectively, where is the diagram automorphism of (resp. ) sending to for .
Now, let us define the root vectors in . We refer the reader to [2] for the construction of root vectors (i.e., ’s defined therein). In particular, the real root vectors are described explicitly by
[TABLE]
Then . The imaginary root vectors are defined by
[TABLE]
and define the elements by the following formal series in :
[TABLE]
Under the isomorphism of two presentations of , the generators and the imaginary root vectors are related (cf. [1, 12]), more precisely, for and , we have
[TABLE]
where is a map such that whenever
- i)
implies that , 2. ii)
in the twisted cases different from , if then .
Note that in the type as . Thus, we can deduce that the map is uniquely determined in the type .
In Lemma 6.1, the scalars and can be described by the root vectors according to the above relations, which will become more computable in our case. Let be a nonzero -weight vector of . Since acts trivially on and commutes with , it implies that
[TABLE]
Lemma 6.4**.**
For any , , we have the root vectors in have the following relations:
[TABLE]
Proof.
We may use the following relations [11, Proposition 2.2.4, Corollary 3.2.4] (cf. [1]): for ,
[TABLE]
Note that is defined by the formal series (6.4). Since in , by comparing the coefficients of in (6.4), we can get
[TABLE]
which implies the lemma by (6.7) and (6.8). ∎
Let . We introduce the height of as if . Define a subset of as follows:
[TABLE]
Let be the subspace of defined as .
Lemma 6.5**.**
* For , the root vector in has the following form:*
[TABLE]
* In ,*
[TABLE]
* In ,*
[TABLE]
* In ,*
[TABLE]
Proof.
Thanks to the reduced expressions of in Remark 6.3, the lemma can be deduced directly by the definition. One can refer to [21, Lemma 4.7] for the assertion (1). To see the remaining assertions we define the operators and of for by and for any , respectively. In the type , we note that and for and . Denote for simplicity. Then we have
[TABLE]
due to . Moreover, for any , we have and by using Lemma 6.2, thus we get
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Finally, the definition of the root vectors and Remark 6.3 imply that
[TABLE]
where for , and
[TABLE]
which deduce the assertion (2). Similarly, we can prove that
[TABLE]
which imply (3) and (4). ∎
Remark 6.6**.**
In order to simplify computations in the following theorem for the type , we actually only need the two terms of :
[TABLE]
which can be deduced directly by the formula (6.9).
Now we compute the highest -weights of the -oscillator representations defined in Subsection 6.1.
Theorem 6.7**.**
* Fix and . The -module has the highest -weight given as follows:*
[TABLE]
for , where ,
* The highest -weight of the -module (resp. ) is given as follows:*
[TABLE]
where .
* The highest -weight of the (resp. )-module is given by*
[TABLE]
where (resp. ).
Proof.
The proof of the first assertion can be found in [29, Theorem 4.10]. For (2), we have verified in Proposition 5.7 that and are highest -weight vectors of -modules and respectively. Therefore, it follows from Lemma 6.1 and the formulae (6.6) that we only need to compute the actions of and on .
Note that for all . By using Lemma 6.5 we have
[TABLE]
and then
[TABLE]
Therefore, we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
On the other hand,
[TABLE]
and then
[TABLE]
In other cases, we can check that , then and . Thus, we get (2) as desired.
To get (3), let . We first focus on the type . By Lemma 6.5(4) we have
[TABLE]
and then
[TABLE]
For , we have , then and . Thus, the assertion (3) for the type is proved. In the type , Lemma 6.5(3) yields
[TABLE]
Note that all terms in the expression of vanish on the vector except for the two terms in (6.11). We can compute the following action by using (6.11):
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
Then and . The assertion (3) for the type follows from Lemma 6.1 and Corollary 5.4(3). ∎
Appendix A Proof of Theorem 4.2
A.1. Proof of Theorem 4.2
For generalized Cartan matrices of finite types, the corresponding system of equations has been solved in [10], the prescription used in this appendix is parallel with the one in there.
Given an affine Cartan matrix . Fix one , denote the subalgebra of generated by all for . Then there is a natural isomorphism Suppose that is any solution to the system of equations (4.1).
We have the following two crucial lemmas.
Lemma A.1**.**
Any satisfying has the form , where , and .
Proof.
Let with . Then implies that
[TABLE]
Hence is zero unless , and
[TABLE]
So the lemma is proved. ∎
Therefore, we may always assume that in the system of equations (4.1) satisfies where .
Note that any pair is -shiftable. This condition can further restrict the choices of and when the nodes and are not connected in the Dynkin diagram of , namely, . More precisely, we have
Lemma A.2**.**
If , then both and lie in .
Proof.
Since , then , we have and . If , there is nothing to do. Assume that is not zero. We rewrite uniquely as the Laurent polynomial in , i.e., a unique form in . Take the nonzero term in this form of such that has the highest (resp. lowest) power, denoted by (resp. ), then the shiftability of implies that
[TABLE]
where and . Hence . Then we can conclude that as desired. Similarly, we have . ∎
Let us first focus on the rank-two cases. Fix in and . Due to Lemma A.2 we may assume that the nodes and are connected. Without loss of generality, we set and , then
[TABLE]
Then and in this case. Assume that and have the forms as in Lemma A.1, i.e.,
[TABLE]
where , and let and satisfy the equality
[TABLE]
Record the -degrees of a monomial in by a degree vector
[TABLE]
Then a Laurent polynomial corresponds to a matrix with each column vector representing for the -degrees of certain term of . Moreover, if is not zero (resp. is not zero), then we use one vector with a parameter (resp. )
[TABLE]
to stand for the possible -degrees of (resp. ). For example, by Lemma A.2, if , then and always equal [math]. Therefore, we obtain the following matrix with possible -degrees of terms of :
[TABLE]
where the first row of the above matrix is the corresponding shifted coefficients in . The terms with shifted coefficient can be cancelled on the left and right hand sides of the equality , then we may omit such terms. Therefore, we have the following matrix
[TABLE]
One useful statement is that if a shifted coefficient is not , then the corresponding degree vector has to be equal to another one in the matrix by the equality . Therefore we can determine all possible -degrees of and as follows:
[TABLE]
Note that there is no -degree vector for the type satisfying the above statement, so does for types and . We have obtained all solutions for the type in Example 4.1. In the type , we substitute the reduced forms of and , i.e., , into (4.1), and then get
[TABLE]
By our assumption in Section 2, we have and for the type .
Let us turn to the higher rank cases. The next result tells us how to “glue” the rank-two cases together.
Lemma A.3**.**
Let be a node which connects to the other two distinct nodes and in the Dynkin diagram. Assume that and the pair of integers is the -degree of any nonzero (monomial) term of . Then we have .
Proof.
Otherwise, assume that and the corresponding nonzero term of is . Without loss of generality, we may let and . Consider the term of which has the factor . So we have the shifted coefficient in is not . However, there is no other term in whose -degree vector equals . It is a contradiction. Hence . ∎
The Lemma A.3 implies that there is no solution to the system of equations (4.1) for whose Dynkin diagram contains or as a subdiagram.
So far, we have ruled out all affine Cartan matrices except that of types or . Now we can substitute the reduced forms of ’s into the system of equations (4.1) to determine the coefficients of the possible terms. Then we obtain all solutions as listed below Theorem 4.2. Therefore, Theorem 4.2 is proved as desired.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] J. Beck, Braid group action and quantum affine algebras , Comm. Math. Phys. 165 (1994), no. 3, 555–568.
- 2[2] J. Beck, H. Nakajima, Crystal bases and two-sided cells of quantum affine algebras , Duke Math. J. 123 (2004), no. 2, 335–402.
- 3[3] G. Benkart, D. J. Britten, F. W. Lemire, Modules with bounded weight multiplicities for simple Lie algebras , Math. Z. 225 (1997), no. 2, 333-353.
- 4[4] H. Boos, F. Göhmann, A. Klümper, K. S. Nirov, A. V. Razumov, Oscillator versus prefundamental representations , J. Math. Phys. 57 (2016), no. 11, 111702, 23 pp.
- 5[5] by same author, Oscillator versus prefundamental representations. II. Arbitrary higher ranks , J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017), no. 9, 093504, 23 pp.
- 6[6] D. J. Britten, J. Hooper, F. W. Lemire, Simple C n subscript 𝐶 𝑛 {C}_{n} modules with multiplicities 1 1 1 and applications , Canad. J. Phys. 72 (1994), no. 7-8, 326-335.
- 7[7] V. Chari, A. Pressley, Quantum affine algebras , Comm. Math. Phys. 142 (1991), 261–283.
- 8[8] by same author, A guide to quantum groups , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994. xvi+651 pp.
