Determining the b-chromatic number of subdivision-vertex neighbourhood coronas
Ra\'ul M. Falc\'on, M. Venkatachalam, S. Julie Margaret

TL;DR
This paper determines the b-chromatic number for specific graph constructions called subdivision-vertex neighbourhood coronas involving paths, cycles, stars, and complete graphs, expanding understanding of graph coloring properties.
Contribution
It provides exact b-chromatic numbers for subdivision-vertex neighbourhood coronas of paths, cycles, stars, and certain complete graphs, with illustrative proofs and examples.
Findings
Exact b-chromatic numbers for G⊙H where G,H are paths, cycles, or stars.
Results for K_n⊙G with degree constraints.
Analysis of K_n⊙G where degree conditions are met.
Abstract
Let and be two graphs, each one of them being a path, a cycle or a star. In this paper, we determine the -chromatic number of every subdivision-vertex neighbourhood corona or , where is the complete graph of order . It is also established for those graphs having -degree not greater than . All the proofs are accompanied by illustrative examples.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
Determining the -chromatic number of subdivision-vertex neighbourhood coronas
Raúl M. Falcón1,∗, M. Venkatachalam 2 and S. Julie Margaret2
1 Dept. Applied Mathematics I, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain.
2 Dept. Mathematics, Kongunadu Arts and Science College, India.
Abstract.
Let and be two graphs, each one of them being a path, a cycle or a star. In this paper, we determine the -chromatic number of every subdivision-vertex neighbourhood corona or , where is the complete graph of order . It is also established for those graphs having -degree not greater than . All the proofs are accompanied by illustrative examples.
Keywords: b-chromatic number; subdivision-vertex neighbourhood corona; path; cycle; star; complete graph.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 05C15.
1. Introduction
In 1999, Irving and Manlove [1] introduced the -chromatic coloring of a graph as a proper -coloring with a -vertex for each color . That is, a vertex such that and, for each color , there exists a vertex satisfying that . Here, denotes the neighborhood of the vertex . The -chromatic number is the maximum positive integer for which a -chromatic coloring of with colors exists. Any such a -chromatic coloring is said to be optimal. Irving and Manlove proved that the problem of determining the -chromatic number of a graph is NP-hard in general, and polynomial-time solvable for trees. It has been dealt with by a wide amount of graph theorists (see [2] for a survey). Of particular interest for the aim of this paper, it is remarkable the study of the -chromatic number of distinct graph products as the Cartesian product [3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 5, 10, 11, 12], the direct product [13, 14], the strong product [13, 15], the lexicographic product [13, 15, 16], the corona product [17] or the subdivision edge and vertex corona [18].
This paper delves into this topic for the subdivision-vertex neighborhood corona (from here on, SVN corona) of paths, cycles, stars and complete graphs. Recall here that the subdivision graph of a graph arises from inserting a new vertex into every edge of . In 2013, Liu and Lu [19] introduced the SVN corona of two graphs and , with , as the graph arising from adding vertex-disjoint copies of to , so that every vertex in is joined to every vertex in the copy of , for all .
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we describe some preliminary concepts and results on Graph Theory that are used throughout the manuscript. Then, Sections 3–6 deal separately with the -chromatic number of SVN coronas of paths, cycles, stars and complete graphs.
2. Preliminaries
All the graphs throughout this paper are finite and simple. This section deals with some notations and preliminary results on graph theory that are used throughout the paper.
Let be a graph. The neighborhood and degree of a vertex are respectively denoted by and . If there is no risk of confusion, then we use the respective notations and . In addition, denotes the maximum vertex degree of the graph . Further, the path, cycle and star of order are respectively denoted by , , and . The complete graph of order is denoted by .
A proper -coloring of a graph is any map assigning colors to the set of vertices so that no two adjacent vertices share the same color. The chromatic number is the minimum positive integer for which a proper -coloring of exists. An example of proper -coloring is the -chromatic coloring with colors that has been described in the introductory section.
Lemma 1**.**
[1]** Let be a graph. Then, .
Proposition 2**.**
[3]** Let be a positive integer. Then,
- •
\varphi(P_{n})=\begin{cases}\begin{array}[]{ll}2,&\text{ if }n\in\{3,4\},\\ 3,&\text{ if }n>4.\end{array}\end{cases}**
- •
\varphi(C_{n})=\begin{cases}\begin{array}[]{ll}2,&\text{ if }n=4,\\ 3,&\text{ if either }n=3\text{ or }n>4.\end{array}\end{cases}**
- •
, for all .
- •
.
In order to study the -chromatic number of any graph, Irving and Manlove defined the -degree of a graph of order as
[TABLE]
where is such that .
Lemma 3**.**
[1]** Let be a graph. Then, .
We finish this preliminary section by introducing some notation concerning any SVN corona . Here, we assume that and . In addition, let denote the set of vertices that are inserted into the edges of the graph to get the subdivision graph . Then, we use the following notation throughout the paper.
- •
denotes the vertex in that is inserted in an edge . Depending on convenience, we may also denote this vertex by .
- •
denotes the copy of each vertex in the copy of the graph .
In the constructive proofs of the paper, all the indices of the just described vertices are considered to be modulo either or (depending on the case). Furthermore, concerning the graphical representation of the SVN corona , edges between and one of the copies of are drawn with dashed lines. Figure 1 illustrates these notations.
In particular,
[TABLE]
Proposition 4**.**
The following statements hold.
- (a)
. 2. (b)
If , then:
- (b.1)
. 2. (b.2)
If , then .
Proof.
The first statement follows readily from (1). Thus, in what follows, we assume that . Since , we have that , whenever . Hence, (b.1) follows from Lemma 1. Furthermore, there are vertices in having maximum degree . From (1), the highest vertex degree in being less than this maximum is . Thus, the assumptions of (b.2) imply that . Hence, the last statement follows from Lemma 3. ∎
Finally, in order to make easier the identification of -vertices in the constructive proofs described in the next four sections, we define a -rainbow set of a graph to be any set formed by exactly one -vertex of each one of the colors associated to an optimal -chromatic coloring of the graph under consideration. In the illustrative figures of this manuscript, vertices of a particular -rainbow set are represented by crosses ; other -vertices are represented by triangles and the remaining vertices are represented by circles .
3. SVN corona of paths
From here on, let denote the set of paths, cycles, stars and complete graphs of any order. In this section, we determine the -chromatic number of the SVN corona of a path , with , and a graph . As a preliminary result, Proposition 4 enables us to study this number for the SVN corona , for any arbitrary graph such that .
Proposition 5**.**
The following statements hold.
- (a)
, whenever . 2. (b)
, whenever .
Proof.
The first statement follows readily from (b.2) in Proposition 4 once it is observed that and . Further, since , we have from (b.1) in Proposition 4 that . In order to prove that this upper bound is reached, it is enough to define the -chromatic coloring of the graph such that, for each triple of non-negative integers , and , we have that , and . A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . ∎
Figure 2 illustrates the -chromatic coloring described in the previous theorem for .
Now, we focus separately on each one of the mentioned graphs , with . In all the proofs, we define an appropriate -chromatic coloring of the graph such that
[TABLE]
for every pair of non-negative integers and . We start by determining the -chromatic number for the SVN corona of two paths.
Theorem 6**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
The case follows from Proposition 5. So, we assume from now on that . From Lemma 3 and (1), we have that all the described values are upper bounds of the -chromatic number under consideration. In order to see that they are reached, we define an appropriate -chromatic coloring of the graph satisfying (2). For each pair of non-negative integers and , the following two cases arise. Here, we assume that .
If , then
[TABLE]
A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices , together with the vertex , if ; the vertex , if ; and the vertex , if and . (Figure 3 illustrates the case .)
Further, if , then is
[TABLE]
A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . (Figure 4 illustrates the case .) ∎
The next graph to study is the SVN corona of a path and a cycle.
Theorem 7**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
The case follows from Proposition 5. So, we assume from now on that . From Lemma 3 and (1), we have that
[TABLE]
This upper bound is not reached for , because every -chromatic coloring of the SVN corona with five colors would imply the existence of a -chromatic coloring of the cycle with three colors. It is not possible, because (see Proposition 2). Hence, . Figure 5 shows that this upper bound is indeed reached.
To prove that the upper bound in is reached for all , we define an appropriate -chromatic coloring of satisfying (2). Two cases arise for each pair of non-negative integers and . (Here, we assume that .)
First, if and , then
[TABLE]
A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices , together with the vertex , if ; the vertex , if ; and the vertices and , if . (Figure 6 illustrates the case .)
Second, if , then we define as in the proof of Theorem 6, except for
[TABLE]
A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . ∎
Now, we study the SVN corona of a path and a star. (Recall here that is the star with leaves, so its order is . It is important for the application of Proposition 5.)
Theorem 8**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
The case follows from Proposition 5. So, we may assume that . From Lemma 3 and (1), all the described values are upper bounds of the -chromatic number. To see that they are reached, we define an appropriate -chromatic coloring of the graph satisfying (2). For each pair of non-negative integers and , the following two cases arise. Here, we assume that , where is the center of the star.
If , then let . Then, we define as
[TABLE]
A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices , together with either the vertices , if ; or the vertices , if ; or the vertices , if . (Figure 7 illustrates the case .)
Further, if , then
[TABLE]
A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . (Figure 8 illustrates the graph .) ∎
Finally, we study the SVN corona of a path and a complete graph.
Theorem 9**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
Again, the case follows from Proposition 5. So, we assume from now on that . From Lemma 3 and (1), all the described values are upper bounds of the -chromatic number under consideration. In order to see that they are reached, we define an appropriate -chromatic coloring of satisfying (2). For each pair of non-negative integers and , the following two cases arise.
If , then . A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices , together the vertices . (Figure 9 illustrates the graph .)
If , then
[TABLE]
A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . (Figure 10 illustrates the case .) ∎
4. SVN corona of cycles
In this section, we determine the -chromatic number of the SVN corona of a cycle , with , and a graph . As a preliminary result, Proposition 4 enables us to study this number for the SVN corona , for any arbitrary graph such that .
Proposition 10**.**
The following statements hold.
- (a)
, whenever . 2. (b)
, whenever .
Proof.
The first statement follows readily from (b.2) in Proposition 4 once it is observed that and . Further, since , Proposition 4 implies that . In order to prove that this upper bound is reached, it is enough to consider the -chromatic coloring of the graph that is defined as the coloring in the proof of Proposition 4, except for
[TABLE]
for every pair of non-negative integers and . A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . ∎
Figure 11 illustrates Proposition 10 for the graphs and .
Now, we focus separately on each one of the mentioned graphs , with . In all the proofs, we define an appropriate -chromatic coloring of the graph satisfying (2) and
[TABLE]
We start by determining the -chromatic number of the SVN corona of a cycle and a path.
Theorem 11**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
The case follows from Proposition 10. So, we assume from now on that . From Lemma 3 and (1), all the described values are upper bounds of the -chromatic number under consideration. In order to see that they are reached, we define an appropriate -chromatic coloring of the graph satisfying (2) and (4). For each pair of non-negative integers and , the following two cases arise. Here, we assume that .
If , then
[TABLE]
A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices , together with the vertex , if . (Figure 12 illustrates the graphs and .)
Further, if , then is
[TABLE]
A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . (Figure 13 illustrates the graphs and .) ∎
The next graph to study is the SVN corona of two cycles.
Theorem 12**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
The case follows from Proposition 10. So, we assume from now on that . From Lemma 3 and (1), all the described values are upper bounds of the -chromatic number under consideration. In order to see that they are reached, it is enough to consider the same map defined in the proof of Theorem 11, except for
[TABLE]
Here, we have assumed that . The same -rainbow sets described in the proof of Theorem 11 are valid here. (Figure 14 illustrates the graphs and .) ∎
Now, we study the SVN corona of a cycle and a star. (Again, recall that is the star of order .)
Theorem 13**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
The case follows from Proposition 10. So, we assume that . From Lemma 3 and (1), all the described values are upper bounds of the -chromatic number. To see that they are reached, we define the -chromatic coloring of satisfying (2) and (4) such that, for each pair of non-negative integers and , the following two cases arise. Here, we assume that , where is the center of the star.
If , then let , then
[TABLE]
A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices , together with either the vertices , if ; or the vertices , if .
Further, if , then
[TABLE]
A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . ∎
Figure 15 illustrates Theorem 13 for the graphs , and .
Finally, we focus on the SVN corona of a cycle and a complete graph.
Theorem 14**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
The case follows from Proposition 10. So, we assume that . From Lemma 3 and (1), all the described values are upper bounds of the -chromatic number. To see that they are reached, we define an appropriate -chromatic coloring of satisfying (2) and (4). For each pair of non-negative integers and , we define as in the proof of Theorem 9, except for , if . In this last case, a -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . Otherwise, if , then a -rainbow set is formed by . (Figure 16 illustrates the graphs and .) ∎
5. SVN corona of stars
In this section, we determine the -chromatic number of the SVN corona of a star , with , of set of vertices , where is the center, with a graph . As a preliminary result, we determine this number for the SVN corona , for any arbitrary graph , with .
Lemma 15**.**
Let be a positive integer and let be a graph of order such that . Then, .
Proof.
Since , the vertex cannot be a -vertex of . Thus, every -rainbow set of is formed by a subset of vertices of the form , together with either the vertex or a subset of vertices of the form . (Observe to this end that the remaining vertices , with , have degree one; and also that the vertex is not adjacent to any vertex of the form .)
Then, the required result of being upper bound follows readily from Lemma 3 applied to the graph obtained after removing the vertices from the graph , together with the fact that every vertex is adjacent to and every vertex .
Now, in order to prove that the described upper bound is reached, we define an appropriate -chromatic coloring of . To this end, let and let be an optimal -chromatic coloring of the graph . Then, we define and , for every non-negative integer . In addition, for each positive integer , we define and . Furthermore, we have from Brooks’ Theorem [20] that every proper coloring of the vertices requires at least either or distinct colors. These vertices can always be colored by using all the colors of the set , together with, at most, the colors in case of being . ∎
Figure 17 illustrates the previous result for the graphs , with .
In addition, the following lemma establishes a lower bound for the -chromatic number of the graph , where is an arbitrary graph.
Lemma 16**.**
Let be a positive integer and let be any graph. Then, .
Proof.
It is readily verified that . Thus, if , then the result follows straightforwardly from Lemma 1. So, we may assume that . It is enough to prove the existence of a -rainbow set of four -vertices in both cases. If , then let be the proper -coloring of that is defined so that, for every non-negative integer , it is , and . Any other vertex is colored as . Then, the set of vertices is a -rainbow set of .
Furthermore, if , then we may assume without loss of generality that and are adjacent. In addition, let be a proper -coloring of . Then, let be the proper -coloring of that is defined so that, , and , otherwise. As such, the set of vertices is a -rainbow set of . ∎
As an immediate consequence of the previous two results, the following theorem establishes the -chromatic number of the SVN corona of a star with either a path, a cycle, or a complete graph.
Theorem 17**.**
Let , and be three positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof.
The respective -chromatic numbers of both graphs and follow straightforwardly from Proposition 2 and Lemmas 15 and 16 once it is observed that . Furthermore, we have from Proposition 2 and Lemma 15 that , whenever . That is, it always holds. ∎
Now, we determine the -chromatic number of the SVN corona of two stars.
Theorem 18**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
Since , we have from Proposition 2 and Lemma 15 that , whenever . That is, whenever . So, we assume from now on that . From Lemma 3 and (1), all the described values are upper bounds of the -chromatic number under consideration. In order to see that they are reached, we define an appropriate -chromatic coloring of the graph . Here, we assume that , where is the center of the star. For each pair of positive integers and , the following two cases arise.
If , then we define , , , and . (Figure 18 (left) illustrates the graph .)
Further, if , then we define , , , and . (Figure 18 (right) illustrates the graph .) ∎
6. SVN corona of complete graphs
In this section, we study the -chromatic number of the SVN corona of a complete graph of set of vertices and a graph , whenever . Here, we assume that . Otherwise, . The following result establishes a lower bound for a general graph .
Lemma 19**.**
Let be a non-empty graph. Then, .
Proof.
Let be a -chromatic coloring of the graph . If , then we define the -chromatic coloring of the graph such that , and , for all and . Hence, . ∎
Figure 19, together with Proposition 2, shows that the lower bound described in the previous lemma is tight, but the equality does not hold in general. It is so that , but .
We study separately each one of the mentioned graphs , with . Firstly, we determine the -chromatic number of the SVN corona in case of being . From Lemma 3 and (1), it is equivalent to say that either or .
Theorem 20**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
The case follows from Theorem 11. So, we assume that . Except for the case , all the described values coincide with and hence, from Lemma 3, they are upper bounds of the -chromatic number under consideration. Proposition 2 and Lemma 19 imply that this upper bound is reached in case of being and . In addition, Figure 19 (right) illustrates the case .
Further, even if , this lower bound is not reached, because every -rainbow set of a -chromatic coloring of with nine colors would only contain non-adjacent vertices of the form or . A simple study of cases enables us to ensure that this condition is not feasible and hence, . This new bound is indeed reached, as we prove later for the case and .
Now, in order to prove that the remaining values are reached, we define an appropriate -chromatic coloring of the graph such that , for every non-negative integer . In addition, for every non-negative integers , with , and , the following cases arise. Here, we assume that .
If , then
[TABLE]
In addition,
[TABLE]
(Figure 20 illustrates the graph .)
Further, if and , then , whenever is odd. Otherwise, if is even, then, for each positive integer , we define
[TABLE]
In addition, we define
[TABLE]
According to this definition of the map , we have that, if is odd, then a -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . Otherwise, if is even, then a -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . (Figure 21 illustrates the graphs and .)
Finally, if , then we define the map as in the previous case, except for
[TABLE]
A -rainbow set is formed by the same -vertices of the previous case, together with , if is even, and , if is odd. (Figure 22 illustrates the graphs and .) ∎
The next graph to study is the SVN corona such that . From Lemma 3 and (1), it is equivalent to say that either or .
Theorem 21**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
The case follows from Theorem 12. In addition, since , the case and follows from Lemmas 3 and 19, together with Proposition 2. Moreover, it is readily verified the non-existence of a -rainbow set of formed by four distinct -vertices. Thus, the same mentioned results imply that .
Let us focus now on the case , for which Lemma 3 implies that . In order to prove that this upper bound is not reached, let us suppose the existence of an -coloring of . If were a vertex of a -rainbow set of , for some and , then the four vertices and would be colored by at most three colors. One of them would be the color , which makes that no vertex of the form may be part of the -rainbow set under consideration. Then, since is a proper coloring, it would be , for some , and hence, from the mentioned four vertices, only the vertex would be part of the -rainbow set. It contradicts the case , for which only vertices of the form may be part of the -rainbow set and hence, the latter only could be formed by at most vertices. Based on the previous remarks, a simple study of cases enables us to ensure that this condition is also no feasible in case of being . Hence, , for all . In order to prove that this upper bound is reached, it is enough to consider the -chromatic coloring of described in the proof of Theorem 20, except for
[TABLE]
Finally, Lemma 3 also implies that the remaining values described in the statement of this theorem are upper bounds of . The same -chromatic coloring described for both and in the proof of Theorem 20 enables us to ensure that these upper bounds are reached in such cases. Here, we assume that . For , it is also enough to consider the same -chromatic coloring described in the proof of Theorem 20, together with , for every positive integer . ∎
Now, in order to study the SVN corona of a complete graph and either a star or a complete graph, the following technical result is useful.
Lemma 22**.**
Let be a positive integer and let be a graph of order such that . If is a -rainbow set of and is a cycle in , with , such that , then must be even. Moreover, if , then .
Proof.
Without loss of generality, let us suppose the existence of an optimal -chromatic coloring of the graph , for which there are a -rainbow set and a cycle in , with , such that .
Since and are two distinct b-vertices of the b-rainbow set , it must be . That is, . Moreover, we have in a similar and recursive way that , and hence, , for every positive integer . If is odd, then . It contradicts the fact that is a proper coloring. So, must be even.
Furthermore, for each non-negative integer , , where all the indices are taken modulo . Since is even, then the sets
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
coincide. These two sets are indeed formed by at most one common color, because, since is a -vertex, it must be . That is, . Therefore, if , then we have that , and thus, . Hence, . That is, . ∎
Let us study the SVN corona such that . From Lemma 3 and (1), it is equivalent to say that .
Theorem 23**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
From Lemma 3 and (1), we have that , whenever , and . In order to prove that this upper bound is reached whenever , it is enough to define the same -chromatic coloring described in the proof of Theorem 20 for the graph , for , together with , for every pair of non-negative integers and . Here, we assume that , where is the center of the star.
Now, let us suppose the existence of an optimal -chromatic coloring of , with colors, and let be a -rainbow set arising from this coloring. From Lemma 22, any subset arising from a cycle within would be such that . However, it is readily verified that can only contain non-adjacent vertices of the form or , with . So, it would be exactly formed by the vertices of the complete graph, which contradicts that . Hence, no such cycle can exist. But then, the mentioned non-adjacency of -vertices makes to be formed by, at most, distinct -vertices. It contradicts again that . Therefore, . In order to prove that this upper bound is reached, it is enough to consider the -chromatic coloring of the graph such that, for each non-negative integer and each pair of positive integers and , we have that , and . A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . (Figure 23 illustrates the graph .) ∎
Let us finish our study by dealing with the SVN corona in case of being . From Lemma 3 and (1), it is equivalent to say that , except for .
Theorem 24**.**
Let and be two positive integers. Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
The case holds from Theorem 21. In addition, since coincides with , the case follows from Proposition 2. Moreover, even if and , it follows readily from Lemma 22 that and . The second and fifth graphs in Figure 24 illustrate that both upper bounds are reached.
Further, even if , for all , the only -rainbow sets of a -chromatic coloring of , with an even number of colors, would be those ones containing one vertex of each one of the sets , with . But then, all the colors should appear the same number of times in the multiset , which is not possible because is not a multiple of the even integer . Hence, , for every even integer . This upper bound is reached, because of the -chromatic proper coloring such that, for every pair of non-negative integers , with , we have that and , except for . Here, . Then, a -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . (The sixth graph in Figure 24 illustrates the case .)
From Lemma 3 and (1), all the remaining values are upper bounds of the -chromatic number. Then, the case follows from Proposition 2 and Lemma 19. Moreover, the case are illustrated by the first, third and seventh graphs in Figure 24. In order to see that the remaining upper bounds are reached, we define an appropriate -chromatic coloring of the graph . The same -chromatic coloring defined for the graph in Figure 24, together with , for every non-negative integer , constitutes a -chromatic coloring for the graph . In addition, if and , then it is enough to define as the restriction to of the -chromatic coloring for that was described in the proof of Theorem 20. Finally, if and is odd, then, for each triple of positive integers and , we define and . A -rainbow set is formed by the vertices . (The fourth graph in Figure 24 illustrates the case .) ∎
The same -chromatic coloring described in the proof of Theorem 24 for the graph , with odd, gives rise to a -chromatic coloring for the subdivision graph . Since , we have from Lemma 3 that , whenever is odd. Note here that Vijayalakshmi [21, Theorem 3.1] (see also [22, Theorem 2.3]) indicated without proof that the central graph of the complete graph , with , has -chromatic number equal to . Since this central graph is isomorphic to the subdivision graph , their claim is false.
7. Conclusion and further work
As a first approach to deal with the -chromatic coloring of SVN coronas, we have determine the -chromatic number of the SVN coronas and , with each and being either a path, or a cycle, or a star, and being the complete graph of order . The case has also been solved in those cases in which . A significant number of technical results based on study of cases, together with their constructive proofs and illustrative examples, have been described to this end. As such, this paper may be considered as a starting point to delve into this topic.
The SVN corona , where , seems to require a more extensive study of cases. We leave this for future work. Furthermore, the natural continuation of this paper is the study of the -chromatic number of SVN coronas of other families of graphs, together with a similar approach to deal with the -chromatic coloring of the so-called subdivision-edge neighbourhood corona of graphs [19].
Acknowledgements
Falcón’s work is partially supported by the research project FQM-016 from Junta de Andalucía.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] R. W. Irving, D. F. Manlove, The b 𝑏 b -chromatic number of a graph, Discrete Appl. Math. , 91 (1999), 127–141.
- 2[2] M. Jakovac, I. Peterin, The b 𝑏 b -chromatic number and related topics - a survey, Discrete Appl. Math. , 235 (2018), 184–201.
- 3[3] M. Kouider, M. Mahéo, Some bounds for the b 𝑏 b -chromatic number of graphs, Discrete Math. , 256 (2002), 267–277.
- 4[4] M. Kouider, M. Mahéo, The b 𝑏 b -chromatic number of the Cartesian product of two graphs. Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. , 44 (2007), 49–55.
- 5[5] R. Javadi, B. Omoomi, On b 𝑏 b -coloring of Cartesian product of graphs, Ars Combin. , 107 (2012), 521–536.
- 6[6] F. Maffray, A. Silva, b 𝑏 b -colouring the Cartesian product of trees and some other graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. , 161 (2013), 650–669.
- 7[7] R. Balakrishnan, S. F. Raj, T. Kavaskar, b 𝑏 b -chromatic number of Cartesian product of some families of graphs, Graphs Combin. , 30 (2014), 511–520.
- 8[8] R. Balakrishnan, S. F. Raj, T. Kavaskar, b 𝑏 b -coloring of Cartesian product of trees, Taiwanese J. Math. , 20 (2016), 1–11.
