Picard group of connected affine algebraic group
Vladimir L. Popov

TL;DR
This paper establishes a precise relationship between the Picard group of a connected affine algebraic group and the fundamental group of the derived subgroup of its reductive quotient, linking algebraic and topological invariants.
Contribution
It proves an isomorphism between the Picard group of a connected affine algebraic group and the fundamental group of a related reductive subgroup, clarifying their structural connection.
Findings
Picard group is isomorphic to the fundamental group of the derived subgroup
Provides a new link between algebraic and topological invariants of algebraic groups
Clarifies the structure of the Picard group for connected affine algebraic groups
Abstract
We prove that the Picard group of a connected affine algebraic group is isomorphic to the fundamental group of the derived subgroup of the reductive algebraic group , where is the unipotent radical of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Advanced Topics in Algebra
\UseRawInputEncoding
Picard group
of connected affine algebraic group
Vladimir L. Popov
Steklov Mathematical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Gubkina 8, Moscow 119991, Russia
Abstract.
We prove that the Picard group of a connected affine algebraic group is isomorphic to the fundamental group of the derived subgroup of the reductive algebraic group , where is the unipotent radical of .
All algebraic varieties considered below are defined over a basic algebraically closed field . We follow the point of view on algebraic groups accepted in [1] and use the following notation.
If is a connected semisimple algebraic group, then is its universal cover, and is the kernel of the canonical isogeny . If is a connected affine algebraic group and is its closed subgroup, then is the homomorphism that maps each character to the class of the one-dimensional homogeneous vector bundle over determined by (see [3, Thm. 4]). If is a morphism of smooth irreducible algebraic varieties, then is the associated with homomorphism of Picard groups (see [2, Chap. III, §1, Sect. 2]). Recall that the derived subgroup of a connected reductive algebraic group is connected and semisimple (see [1, Sects. I.2.2 and II.14.2]).
The purpose of this note is to prove the following theorem.
Theorem. Let be a connected affine algebraic group, let be its unipotent radical, let be the canonical homomorphism, let be the derived subgroup of the connected reductive group , and let be the identical embedding. Then the following canonical homomorphisms are isomorphisms:
[TABLE]
Corollary. *The group is canonically isomorphic to the group and is noncanonically isomorphic to the group . *
Example. Let . Then the group is trivial, and the derived group of the group is the semisimple group . The latter is simply connected, so the group is trivial. Therefore, by Theorem, the group is trivial. This agrees with the fact that the group variety of the group is isomorphic to an open subset of .
The following lemma is used in the proof of Theorem.
Lemma. Let be an irreducible smooth algebraic variety, let be a nonempty open subset of , and let be a point of . Then for the morphisms
[TABLE]
*the homomorphisms and are mutually inverse isomorphisms. *
Proof of Lemma. Consider the morphisms
[TABLE]
It follows from (1) and (2) that the following equalities hold:
[TABLE]
As is known, is an isomorphism (see [6, Chap. II, Prop. 6.6 and its proof]), and is a surjection (see [6, Chap. II, Prop. 6.5(a)]). From this and the left equality in (3) it followes that is an isomorphism. In view of the right equality in (3), this shows that is also an isomorphism, and and are mutually inverse.
Proof of Theorem and Corollary. Since the connected affine algebraic group is unipotent, it follows from [7, Props. 1, 2] that
(a) the group variety of is isomorphic to an affine space,
(b) there is the commutative diagram
[TABLE]
where is an isomorphism of group varieties (but, generally speaking, not of groups) and is the natural projection onto the second factor.
In view of Lemma, it follows from (a) and (4) that is an isomorphism.
According to [4, Thm. 1], in the group there exists a torus such that the mapping
[TABLE]
is an isomorphism of group varieties (but, in general, not of groups). Consider the commutative diagram
[TABLE]
in which , , where is the identity element. Since the group variety of the torus is isomorphic to an open subset of the affine space, (5) and Lemma imply that is an isomorphism.
In view of the semisimplicity of the group the group is trivial, and since the group is simply connected, the group is trivial (see [3, Prop. 1]). According to [3, Thm. 4], it follows from this that is an isomorphism. This completes the proof of Theorem.
The first part of Corollary follows directly from Theorem, while the second part follows from the fact that is a finite abelian group.
Remark. The above Theorem corrects Theorem 6 of [3]. The latter asserts that the group is isomorphic to \pi\big{(}G/{\mathscr{R}}(G)\big{)}, where is the solvable radical of . If the group extension splits, then the group is isomorphic to the derived group of , and so the formulated assertion is true in view of Theorem proved above. But in general this is not the case, as Example above shows: in it, the group is isomorphic to , and is isomorphic to the group of all -th roots of in the field . This latter group is nontrivial if is not a power of the characteristic of the field (however, the group is trivial for every ).
I am grateful to Shuai Wang for bringing this example to my attention; this led to writing of this note. I am also indebted to S. O. Gorchinsky whose comments led to the above proof of Lemma and emphasis on the canonical nature of the construction (the original proof of Lemma in preprint [5] was more geometric).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] A. Borel, Linear Algebraic Groups , 2nd ed., Grad. Texts in Math., Vol. 126, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991, xii+288 pp.
- 2[2] I. R. Shafarevich, Basic Algebraic Geometry , Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Bd. 213, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974.
- 3[3] V. L. Popov, Picard groups of homogeneous spaces of linear algebraic groups and one-dimensional homogeneous vector bundles , Math. USSR-Izv. 8 (1974), no. 2, 301–327.
- 4[4] V. L. Popov, Group varieties and group structures , Math. USSR-Izv. 86 (2022), no. 5, ar Xiv:2105.12861 v 2 [math.AG] 1 Feb 2022.
- 5[5] V. L. Popov, Picard group of connected affine algebraic group , ar Xiv:2302.1337 v 1 [math.AG] 26 Feb 2023.
- 6[6] R. Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977.
- 7[7] A. Grothendieck, Torsion homologique et sections rationnelles , in: Séminaire Claude Chevalley , t. 3: Anneaux de Chow et applications , 2e année, Secrétariat mathématique, Paris, 1958, exp. 5, 29 pp.
