Profinite non-rigidity of arithmetic groups
Amir Y. Weiss Behar

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that for many high rank arithmetic lattices, there are finite index subgroups with isomorphic profinite completions but not isomorphic themselves, revealing non-rigidity phenomena.
Contribution
It establishes the existence of non-rigid behaviors in the profinite completions of high rank arithmetic groups, with specific exceptions identified.
Findings
Existence of non-isomorphic subgroups with isomorphic profinite completions
Non-rigidity phenomenon in high rank arithmetic lattices
Identification of exceptions to the non-rigidity rule
Abstract
We show that for a typical high rank arithmetic lattice , there exist finite index subgroups and such that while . But there are exceptions to that rule.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · semigroups and automata theory
Profinite non-rigidity of arithmetic groups
Amir Y. Weiss Behar
Einstein Institute of Mathematics
Edmond J. Safra Campus (Givat-Ram)
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
9190401
Israel
Abstract.
We show that for a typical high rank arithmetic lattice , there exist finite index subgroups and such that while . But there are exceptions to that rule.
1. Introduction
Let be a finitely generated residually finite group. We say that is profinitely-rigid if whenever for some finitely generated residually finite group , then . Here (resp. ) denotes the profinite completion of (resp. ).
Up until recently, the only profinite rigid groups were ”small” (i.e. without non-abelian free subgroups). Recently, in a groundbreaking work, Bridson, McReynolds, Reid and Spitler gave first examples of ”big” groups which are profinitely rigid, among them are some fundamental groups of hyperbolic 3-manifolds [3] and some triangle groups [2].
Arithmetic subgroups of semisimple Lie groups need not be profinitely rigid ([1],[7]). A well known open problem asks:
[TABLE]
While we will not answer this question, we will show that there are finite index subgroups of these groups (at least when ) which are not profinitely rigid. In fact, we will show a much more general result:
Theorem 1.1** (Main Theorem).**
Let be a number field and be a connected, simply connected, absolutely almost simple -linear algebraic group of high -rank such that satisfies the congruence subgroup property and an arithmetic subgroup.
- (1)
Unless is of type or and , has infinitely many pairs of finite index subgroups and which are not isomorphic but their profinite completions are. 2. (2)
The exceptional cases are truly exceptional and in these cases, there are no such pairs at all. In fact, if are arithmetic subgroups with isomorphic profinite completions then and are isomorphic.
Note that we show that each such has a finite index subgroup which is not profinitely rigid by showing that for some commensurable to it. This complements results of [7],[1] and [9] which give examples of non-commensurable arithmetic groups which are profinitely isomorphic.
To illustrate our methods, let us now present them only for (methods A & B) and (method C).
**Method A: **
Using the centre of the simply connected form: Let be two different primes, and let be the principle congruence subgroup corresponding to . Let be the element of which is at the places and at the place , similarly define . Define and . Then but and cannot be isomorphic. For details see 3.1.
**Method B: **
Using a non-trivial Dynkin automorphism: Let be two different primes. Consider the following maximal parabolic subgroups of .
[TABLE]
Similarly define the maximal parabolic subgroups and of . Now, let be the congruence subgroup corresponding to , and is trivial , and to be the congruence subgroup corresponding to , and is trivial. Then the profinite completions of and are isomorphic via the automorphism of which is the non-trivial Dynkin automorphism at the place and the identity elsewhere, but they themselves cannot be isomorphic. For details see 4.1.
**Method C: **
Using the number field: Let be two different primes such that is a square in and , hence and splits completely in . Set and , to be the primes lying over and respectively. Let be the principle congruence subgroup corresponding to , and be the principle congruence subgroup corresponding to . As has trivial congruence kernel, , where for a prime , is the completion of with respect to the primes lying over . Then the profinite completions, and are isomorphic via the automorphism of which is the transposition of the places and . But and cannot be isomorphic. For details see 3.2.
The main theorem is proved by generalizing the above methods to more general arithmetic lattices (In fact, only methods A and C are really needed).
The paper is organized as follows: after some preliminaries in §2, we will generalize methods A and C in §3 deducing the first part of the main theorem. In §4, we will elaborate on method B and finally in §5 we will prove that the exceptional cases are true exceptions, concluding the main theorem. In §6, we will give a stronger and more general version of the main theorem, stating that it holds for -arithmetic groups and not merely for arithmetic groups. Moreover, one can get any (finite) number of non-isomorphic subgroup with isomorphic profinite completions (not just pairs).
Acknowledgments. This work is a part of the author’s PhD thesis at the Hebrew University. For suggesting the above topic and for providing helpful guidance, suggestions and ideas I am deeply grateful to my advisors Alexander Lubotzky and Shahar Mozes. During the period of work on this paper I was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 882751) and by the ISF-Moked grant 2019/19.
2. Preliminaries
Throughout we assume that is a number field. The set of places of is denoted by , it is the union of the set of archimedean places and the set of finite places . The completion of at is denoted by . Let denote the ring of integers of and for a finite place , denote by the ring of integers of . The ring of finite adeles is the restricted product over all the finite completions of . If is clear from the context, we will omit the letter from all the above.
Let be a connected, simply connected, absolutely almost simple -linear algebraic group, with a fixed faithful -representation . A subgroup is called arithmetic if it is commensurable with (see [12] and [14] for more details about arithmetic groups). We will usually write for the adjoint form of (which is the universal form), and by the universal covering map, it is a central isogeny, and is a finite group. The -rank of is , where is the dimension of a maximal -split torus, is said to have high -rank if its -rank is .
We will use Margulis’ superrigidity in a rather delicate manner. The particular version we use is the following:
Theorem 2.1** (Margulis’ superrigidity).**
Assume is of high -rank, and let be arithmetic subgroups. Assume further that . If is an isomorphism, then there exists a unique -automorphism of and a unique automorphism of such that for every , where is the automorphism of induced by .
Proof.
Identifying and via the universal covering map as arithmetic subgroups of the adjoint group , Margulis’ superrigidity [11, Theorem VIII.3.6.(ii)] implies that the isomorphism can be extended to an automorphism of . By the properties of the restriction of scalars functor, such an automorphism must be of the form for a -automorphism of and an automorphism of the field [6, Proposition A.5.14]. Moreover, the -automorphism of the adjoint form can be interpreted as a -automorphism of the universal form , hence the assertion of the theorem. ∎
If is an automorphism of , it induces a permutation of the (finite) places of , and thus an automorphism of the adelic group by permuting its factors according to , call this automorphism . If is a -automorphism of , it induces a unique -automorphism for every finite place of and the product restricts to an automorphism [14, §5]. Clearly for every (We identify the group of rational points with its diagonal embedding in the group of adelic points ) and is unique with this property. We thus get the following corollary:
Corollary 2.2**.**
Under the assumptions of the previous theorem. If is an isomorphism. Then there exist unique automorphisms and of the adelic group , such that is induced from an automorphism of , and is induced from a -automorphism of with for every .
We will also need an adelic version of Margulis’ superrigidity stated and proven by Kammeyer and Kionke [8, Theorem 3.2]:
Theorem 2.3**.**
Let be a connected, absolutely almost simple -linear algebraic group of high -rank and an arithmetic subgroup. If is a homomorphism such that has non-empty interior, then there exist a homomorphism of adelic groups , and a group homomorphism with finite image such that for all . Moreover, and are uniquely determined by this condition.
2.1. Profinite groups and the congruence subgroup property
A family is an inverse system of finite groups over the directed set if the ’s are finite groups, are homomorphisms of groups whenever such that for every and . A group is called profinite if it is the inverse limit of an inverse system of finite groups over some directed set. A profinite group is a compact, Hausdorff, totally disconnected topological group, a map of profinite groups is a continuous homomorphism of groups.
Example 2.4** (Profinite completion).**
Let be a finitely generated group, let be the set of finite index normal subgroups of , for , declare that whenever , it is a directed set. Consider the natural quotient homomorphisms , then the profinite group , is called the profinite completion of .
The profinite completion and the set of isomorphism classes of the finite quotients of hold the same information in following manner:
Theorem 2.5**.**
[18, Theorems 3.2.2 & 3.2.7]** If and are two finitely generated residually finite groups then if and only if
There is a natural map given by , this map is injective if and only if is residually finite, in this case we identify with its image . The pair satisfies a universal property: is dense in , and for every profinite group , and every homomorphism , there exists a unique homomorphism of profinite groups such that .
There is a strong connection between the finite index subgroups of and those of :
Proposition 2.6**.**
[18, Proposition 3.2.2]** Let be a finitely generated residually finite group, then there is a one-to-one correspondence between the set of all finite index subgroups of and the set of all finite index subgroup of , given by
[TABLE]
where denote the closure of in . Moreover, this bijection preserves normality, index and quotients.
Example 2.7** (Congruence completion).**
Let be an arithmetic subgroup of . Consider the set of all congruence subgroups, i.e. subgroups that contain for some ideal , where is the reduction map . As in the profinite completion, is a directed set by the inverse of inclusion, and one can form the Congruence completion of with respect to this inverse system.
Thus, there is a surjective map between the profinite completion and the congruence completion. Call , the kernel of this map, the congruence kernel. The group is said to have the congruence subgroup property if the congruence kernel is a finite group. It is not difficult to see that the congruence subgroup property is actually a property of the ambient group and the field .
It was conjectured by Serre [19] that if and is an arithmetic subgroup then is trivial or isomorphic to a subgroup of the roots of unity of . The conjecture has been proven in many instances, including for example, all the isotropic cases [17] and all anisotropic groups of type ,, (except for some triality forms of ), ,, and ([14, Ch.9], [16]).
2.2. A number theoretic lemma
Lemma 2.8**.**
Let be a connected, simply connected, absolutely almost simple -linear algebraic group. There exist infinitely many finite places such that splits over . Moreover, one can assume that for these places, .
Proof.
There exists a finite Galois field extension such that splits over and . By Chebotarev’s density theorem [13, Corollary 13.6], there exist infinitely many primes that splits completely in . In particular, if such a prime lies under a prime then where and are the places corresponding to the primes and respectively. Thus, for such a place , splits over .
Moreover, as the centre is finite, for all but finitely many places, . So there exist infinitely many places with and splits over . ∎
3. First part of the main theorem - Existence
In this section we will prove the first part of theorem 1.1, the existence part, it will follow from the two theorems below.
Theorem 3.1**.**
Let be an arithmetic subgroup. Assume that has the congruence subgroup property and type different then or . Then there exist two non-isomorphic finite index subgroups with isomorphic profinite completions.
Proof.
(Following Method A) Moving to a finite index subgroup, one can assume that there exists a finite set of primes and a compact open subgroup commensurable with such that
[TABLE]
Indeed, the congruence kernel is finite, so one can find a finite index subgroup of the above form, by proposition 2.6, there exists a finite index subgroup such that . Let be the canonical central isogeny to the adjoint form , by moving again to a finite index subgroup one can assume that , and is still of the same form as .
Let be the set of all rational primes lying under some valuation in , and . By lemma 2.8 one can find two valuations lying over different rational primes and respectively and such that , and thus also elements and of the same order. For every , let be a finite index subgroup of with . Define where
[TABLE]
Now we define the following subgroups of :
[TABLE]
Clearly and are isomorphic finite index subgroups of . By proposition 2.6, there exist finite index subgroups with for . We will finish the proof by showing that and cannot be isomorphic.
Assume to the contrary that there exists an isomorphism . By corollary 2.2 there exist unique adelic automorphisms and of such that is induced from an automorphism of and is induced from a -automorphism of such that for every , taking closures one deduces that . On the other hand, the induced map between the profinite completions is unique with for every . Thus, it must be that . In particular, it implies that the ’th place of is mapped isomorphically onto the ’th place of . This is a contradiction since , so the ’th place of is centerless, but the ’th place of has a non-trivial centre. ∎
Theorem 3.2**.**
Let be an arithmetic subgroup. Assume further that has the congruence subgroup property and that is a number field of dimension over . Then there exist two non-isomorphic finite index subgroups with isomorphic profinite completions.
Proof.
(Following Method C) As before, by moving to a finite index subgroup we can assume that and that , for some finite set of places and commensurable with . Let and be as before. By Chebotarev’s density theorem there exist infinitely many rational primes that split completely in [13, Corollary 13.6], pick two such different primes . Say and . For , let be the principle congruence subgroups modulo , then obviously .
By corollary 2.2, if and are isomorphic, then there exist unique adelic automorphisms and of such that is induced from an automorphism of and is induced from a -automorphism of such that for every , taking closures one deduces that . As acts by permuting the places and acts place-wise it must be that . We claim that such must be trivial, which will finish the proof.
Indeed, let be the Galois closure of , , let be a prime lying over and be its decomposition group. The correspondence given by is a one to one correspondence (of -sets), hence must be trivial. Thus, acts freely on the set of primes , as needed. ∎
4. Another set of examples
The following theorem is not needed for the proof of the main theorem, but following method B, it gives many more examples of non-profinitely rigid arithmetic groups.
Theorem 4.1**.**
Let be an arithmetic subgroup. Assume further that has: 1) the congruence subgroup property; 2) type or ; and 3) there exists an archimedean place such that . Then there exist two non-isomorphic finite index subgroups subgroups with isomorphic profinite completions.
Note that are exactly the types of Dynkin diagrams with a non-trivial symmetry.
Proof.
(Following Method B) As before, by moving to a finite index subgroup we can assume that and that , for some finite set of places and commensurable with .
By lemma 2.8, one can find two different primes (where is as in the previous section) lying over different rational primes, such that splits over both and . Fix root systems for and , and let be the set of simple roots, identified for both groups. For , the reduction maps are onto, and is the split universal Chevalley group of the same type as over the residue field. The root systems we fixed define corresponding root systems for .
For each of the types involved, there exist a non-trivial symmetry of the Dynkin diagram, pick a subset which is non-invariant under , e.g.
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The symmetry of the Dynkin diagram induces an isomorphism of [21, Corollary to theorem 29]. For a subset of simple roots, let be the parabolic subgroup of corresponding to , then and are non-conjugate in , but isomorphic via .
Now, let be the canonical reduction map modulo . Consider the following two congruence subgroups
[TABLE]
Then and are isomorphic via where for and is the isomorphism of induced by the non-trivial symmetry of the Dynkin diagram. It remains to show that and cannot be isomorphic.
Assume to the contrary that there exists an isomorphism . By corollary 2.2, there exist unique adelic automorphisms and of such that is induced from an automorphism of and is induced from a -automorphism of such that for every . Moreover is of the form where is conjugation by some , is an outer automorphism which comes from a symmetry of the Dynkin diagram and just acts as at each place. In particular is mapped onto and is mapped onto . By our choice of and it must be that and .
We have that , multiplying from both sides by elements of , we can assume that conjugation by preserves the root system that was fixed in the beginning of the proof. If , let be a simple root in , then the action of on the one-parameter unipotent subgroup must be as scalar multiplication by some with . Thus, the action on the opposite one-parameter unipotent subgroup is given as scalar multiplication by , but then . Hence must be equal to . The same argument imply that , and so . But was chosen to be non-invariant under , a contradiction. ∎
5. Second part of the main theorem - The exceptional cases
Lemma 5.1**.**
Let be a connected, simply connected and absolutely almost simple -linear algebraic group of type or . Then splits over for every .
Proof.
The forms of the group are classified by the first Galois cohomology set . For the groups considered, the universal and the adjoint forms coincide, moreover there are no symmetries for their Dynkin diagram, hence . As the field is local and non-archimedean, by [14, Theorem 6.4], the Galois cohomology group is trivial. Thus, there is only one (up to an isomorphism) form for , in particular, this form must be the split form. ∎
Remark*.*
If is a -split simple -linear algebraic group, then the automorphism group, , of is completely known. Precisely, following the notations of [21, Theorem 30], each automorphism can be written as the product of an inner, a diagonal, a graph and a field automorphism. We have used graph automorphisms for Method B and field automorphisms for Method C. The group of diagonal automorphisms (modulo the inner ones) has a connection with the centre of the universal form [21, Exercise following theorem 30], which was used for Method A. Thus, restriction ourselves to the exceptional cases, where has type or and (and also for ), all automorphisms are inner.
Theorem 5.2**.**
Let be a connected, simply connected and absolutely almost simple high -rank -linear algebraic group of type or . If are two arithmetic subgroups with isomorphic profinite completions, then and are isomorphic.
Proof.
Let be two arithmetic subgroups. As noted in the preliminaries, the congruence kernel is trivial for these groups, so one can write where is a finite set and are commensurable with . Assume that is an isomorphism between the profinite completions of the two. By adelic supperrigidity 2.3, there exists a unique homomorphism of adelic groups
[TABLE]
such that , as is centerless by our assumption on the type of . Moreover, using the uniqueness of the map, must be an isomorphism, and .
Consider the homomorphisms which are the composite
[TABLE]
of the inclusion in the ’th place, , and the projection onto the ’th place. This is a continuous homomorphism between a -adic group and a -adic group, so if it must be a locally constant map. So its image is a normal countable subgroup of , in particular it is not of finite index, and hence must be trivial [14, Proposition 3.17]. Thus, is given by an isomorphism at each place, and must be conjugation by some (see the remark above).
We truncate in the following manner,
[TABLE]
By our choice of , conjugation by is again an isomorphism between and . By the Strong Approximation theorem [14, Theorem 7.12], there exists some with . Thus, conjugation by is an isomorphism between and . We have that , which imply that and can be conjugated by , as needed. ∎
6. Final Remarks
It is possible to generalize our methods even further. For example, using Method A, we can find finite index subgroups of which are not profinitely rigid. Explicitly (for ), the following finite index subgroups of are non-isomorphic, but their profinite completions are:
[TABLE]
Indeed, just as in §3, , where is the principle congruence subgroup of of level 15.
Let us stress out that it is still unknown whether or not itself is profinitely rigid, and in fact, there are some reasons to believe it is profinitely rigid (see for example [5, §4]). On the other hand, increasing slightly the dimension, it has been shown that is not profinitely rigid [5].
We would like to state a stronger version of Theorem 1.1 which includes the above example. First, we need some further notations. Let be a finite set of places containing all the archimedean places. The ring of -integers of the number field is
[TABLE]
Let be a connected, simply connected, absolutely almost simple -linear algebraic group with a fixed faithful -representation . A subgroup is called an -arithmetic subgroup if it is commensurable with . As in §2, there is a map from the profinite completion to the congruence completion, denote its kernel by . The group is said to have the congruence subgroup property (with respect to ) if is a finite group. Again, this is actually a property of the ambient group , the field and the set . The proofs given throughout the paper, carry over to establish:
Theorem 6.1**.**
Let be a positive integer, a number field, a finite set of places of containing all the archimedean places, a connected, simply connected and absolutely almost simple -linear algebraic group such that and such that satisfies the congruence subgroup property (with respect to ). Let be an -arithmetic subgroup. Then, unless has type or and , has infinitely many sequences of pairwise non-isomorphic finite index subgroups with isomorphic profinite completions.
As in the main theorem, the exceptional cases are indeed exceptional. Moreover, in these cases, if is an -arithmetic subgroup and is an -arithmetic subgroup with then and .
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Aka, M. Arithmetic groups with isomorphic finite quotients. Journal of Algebra 352 , 1 (2012), 322–340.
- 2[2] Bridson, M. R., Mc Reynolds, D., Reid, A. W., and Spitler, R. On the profinite rigidity of triangle groups. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 53 , 6 (2021), 1849–1862.
- 3[3] Bridson, M. R., Mc Reynolds, D. B., Reid, A. W., and Spitler, R. Absolute profinite rigidity and hyperbolic geometry. Annals of Mathematics 192 , 3 (2020), 679–719.
- 4[4] Bridson, M. R., and Reid, A. W. Profinite rigidity, kleinian groups, and the cofinite Hopf property. ar Xiv preprint ar Xiv:2107.14696 (2021).
- 5[5] Cheetham-West, T., Lubotzky, A., Reid, A. W., and Spitler, R. Property FA is not a profinite property. ar Xiv preprint ar Xiv:2212.08207 (2022).
- 6[6] Conrad, B., Gabber, O., and Prasad, G. Pseudo-Reductive Groups , vol. 26. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
- 7[7] Kammeyer, H., and Kionke, S. On the profinite rigidity of lattices in higher rank Lie groups. ar Xiv preprint ar Xiv:2009.13442 (2020).
- 8[8] Kammeyer, H., and Kionke, S. Adelic superrigidity and profinitely solitary lattices. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 313 , 1 (2021), 137–158.
