The $\mathsf{AC}^0$-Complexity Of Visibly Pushdown Languages

TL;DR

This paper investigates which visibly pushdown languages are in the class AC^0, introduces intermediate VPLs, and provides an algorithm to classify languages as AC^0 or not, with implications for visibly counter languages.

Contribution

It introduces intermediate VPLs and an algorithm to decide AC^0 membership for VPLs, extending previous results to visibly counter languages.

Findings

Algorithm classifies VPLs as in AC^0 or not

Introduces intermediate VPLs with unknown AC^0 status

Decides AC^0 membership for visibly counter languages

Abstract

We study the question of which visibly pushdown languages (VPLs) are in the complexity class $\mathsf{AC}^0$ and how to effectively decide this question. Our contribution is to introduce a particular subclass of one-turn VPLs, called intermediate VPLs, for which the raised question is entirely unclear: to the best of our knowledge our research community is unaware of containment or non-containment in $\mathsf{AC}^0$ for any language in our newly introduced class. Our main result states that there is an algorithm that, given a visibly pushdown automaton, correctly outputs either that its language is in $\mathsf{AC}^0$, outputs some $m\geq 2$ such that $L$ is $\mathsf{ACC}^0(m)$-hard (implying that $L$ is not in $\mathsf{AC}^0$), or outputs a finite disjoint union of intermediate VPLs that $L$ is constant-depth equivalent to. In the latter case one can moreover effectively compute $k,l\in\mathbb{N}_{>0}$ with $k\not=l$ such that the concrete intermediate VPL $L(S\rightarrow\varepsilon\mid a c^{k-1} S b_1\mid ac^{l-1}Sb_2)$ is constant-depth reducible to the language $L$. Due to their particular nature we conjecture that either all intermediate VPLs are in $\mathsf{AC}^0$ or all are not. As a corollary of our main result we obtain that in case the input language is a visibly counter language our algorithm can effectively determine if it is in $\mathsf{AC}^0$ - hence our main result generalizes a result by Krebs et al. stating that it is decidable if a given visibly counter language is in $\mathsf{AC}^0$ (when restricted to well-matched words). For our proofs we revisit so-called Ext-algebras (introduced by Czarnetzki et al.), which are closely related to forest algebras (introduced by Boja\'nczyk and Walukiewicz), and use Green's relations.