Determining skew left braces of size np
Teresa Crespo, Daniel Gil-Mu\~noz, Anna Rio, Montserrat Vela

TL;DR
This paper characterizes skew left braces of size np where p is an odd prime and n meets specific conditions, providing a classification, an algorithm for enumeration, and confirming a conjecture for size 12p.
Contribution
It introduces a new structural decomposition for skew left braces of size np and develops an algorithm to enumerate all such braces, confirming a conjecture for size 12p.
Findings
Classified skew left braces of size np under certain conditions.
Developed an algorithm to enumerate all skew left braces of size np.
Proved the conjecture for skew left braces of size 12p with p ≥ 7.
Abstract
We define the twofold semidirect product of two skew left braces, in which both the additive and multiplicative groups are semidirect products of the corresponding groups of the given skew left braces. We consider an odd prime and an integer satisfying , for every group of order and such that each group of order has a unique -Sylow subgroup. Under these conditions, we prove that any skew left brace of size is either a twofold semidirect product of the trivial brace of size and a skew left brace of size or a companion skew left brace of that one. We develop an algorithm to obtain all skew left braces of size from the skew left braces of size and provide a formula to count them. We use this result to describe all skew left braces of size for , which proves a conjecture of V.G. Bardakov, M.V.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
Double semidirect products and
skew left braces of size
Teresa Crespo*(1), Daniel Gil-Muñoz(2), Anna Rio(3)*
and Montserrat Vela*(3)*
Abstract
We define the double semidirect product of skew left braces and prove that if is an odd prime and is an integer such that and each group of order has a unique -Sylow subgroup, then any skew left brace of size is a double semidirect product of the trivial brace of size and a skew brace of size . We develop an algorithm to obtain all braces of size from the set of braces of size and provide a formula to count them. We use the result to describe all braces of size for and prove a conjecture of Bardakov, M.V. Neshchadim and M.K. Yadav.
(1) Departament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 585, 08007, Barcelona (Spain)
(2) Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Department of Algebra, Sokolovska 83, 18600 Praha 8, Czech Republic
(3) Departament de Matemàtiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Edifici Omega, Jordi Girona, 1-3, 08034, Barcelona (Spain)
Keywords: Left braces, Holomorphs, regular subgroups, Hopf Galois structures.
2020MSC: Primary: 16T05, 16T25, 12F10; Secondary: 20B35, 20B05, 20D20, 20D45.
††footnotetext: The first author was supported by grant PID2019-107297GB-I00 (Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades). The second author was supported by Czech Science Foundation, grant 21-00420M, and by Charles University Research Centre program UNCE/SCI/022. Third and fourth authors are supported by 2021 SGR 01468. Email addresses: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
1 Introduction
In [7] Rump introduced an algebraic structure called brace to study set-theoretic solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation. Guarnieri and Vendramin in [6] gave the more general concept of skew brace. A skew (left) brace is a set with two operations and such that and are groups and the brace relation is satisfied, namely,
[TABLE]
for all , where denotes the inverse of with respect to . We call ) the additive group and the multiplicative group of the skew left brace. We say that is a classical brace if its additive group is abelian.
Let and be skew left braces. A map is said to be a skew brace morphism if and for all . If is bijective, we say that is an isomorphism. In that case we say that the skew braces and are isomorphic.
In [6] Guarnieri and Vendramin proved that given a group , there is a bijective correspondence between isomorphism classes of skew left braces with additive group and conjugacy classes of regular subgroups of .
In [3], we classified classical left braces of size , for a prime number, . In [4], we gave a method to determine all braces of size from the braces of size and certain classes of morphisms from the multiplicative group of these braces of size to . For a prime number , we applied the obtained results to classify classical left braces of size . In particular we proved the conjectures in [1] on the numbers of isomorphism classes of classical left braces of size and , respectively.
Our aim in this paper is to generalize the method obtained in [4] to skew nonclassical left braces of size , where is a prime number and an integer not divisible by and such that every group of order has a normal subgroup of order . We shall apply our method to classify skew left braces of size , for a prime number, . In particular we will prove the following conjecture in [1] on the number of isomorphism classes of skew left braces of size , .
[TABLE]
We note that and (see [9]).
2 Skew braces of size
We recall the definition of direct and semidirect product of braces as defined in [2] and [8].
Let and be skew left braces. Then together with
[TABLE]
is a skew left brace called the direct product of the braces and .
Now, let be a group homomorphism. Consider in the additive structure of the direct product
[TABLE]
and the multiplicative structure of the semidirect product
[TABLE]
Then, we obtain a skew left brace, which is called the semidirect product of the skew left braces and via .
We observe in particular that the additive group of the semidirect product of two left braces is the direct product of the corresponding additive groups. In [4] we proved that a classical brace of size , where is a prime number and an integer not divisible by and such that every group of order has a normal subgroup of order , is a direct or semidirect product of the trivial brace of size and a brace of size . In this case, the additive group was a direct product of and an abelian group of order . However we are now interested in skew braces of size , for which both additive and multiplicative groups may be strictly semidirect products of and a group of order . We want then to determine the relationship between these skew braces of order and skew braces of order . To this end we shall define the double semidirect product of two skew braces.
Let us recall first that for a skew left brace and each , the map
[TABLE]
is bijective with inverse
[TABLE]
where denotes the inverse of with respect to . It follows that .
Proposition 1**.**
Let and be skew left braces and let
[TABLE]
be morphisms of groups. Consider in the additive structure of the semidirect product
[TABLE]
and the multiplicative structure of the semidirect product
[TABLE]
We assume that the following equality holds for any and all
[TABLE]
Then is a skew brace.
Proof.
We check the brace condition for , i.e., the equality
[TABLE]
for . The term on the left is
[TABLE]
and the term on the right is
[TABLE]
Since is a brace, the two second components are equal. Now, the first component of the term on the left is
[TABLE]
where the second equality follows from the brace condition for . The first component of the term on the right is
[TABLE]
The equality of the first components is then equivalent to
[TABLE]
for all , hence to equality (2). ∎
Definition 2**.**
We call double semidirect product of the skew braces and via and the skew brace in Proposition 1.
Remarks 3**.**
If is the trivial morphism, then (2) is satisfied and we recover the notion of semidirect product of skew braces. 2. 2)
If is a trivial brace and is abelian, then (2) is equivalent to for all , i.e. to being a group morphism with respect to .
Turning back to skew braces of size , we establish the following hypothesis on and which will be maintained all along the paper.
Hypothesis**.**
Let be an odd prime and an integer such that does not divide and each group of order has a normal subgroup of order .
In particular, we may consider and , which satisfy this hypothesis.
Proposition 4**.**
Any skew brace of size is a double semidirect product of the trivial brace of size and a skew brace of size .
Proof.
Let be a left brace of size with additive group and multiplicative group . Then, by the Schur-Zassenhaus theorem, with a group of order and a group morphism and with a group of order and a group morphism. We note that is the group of automorphisms of the trivial brace of size , which is the unique brace of size . We write additively and identify with . As a set, is the cartesian product of and a set with elements endowed with two operations and such that and are groups isomorphic to and , respectively.
For , we have then
[TABLE]
We write the brace relation for
[TABLE]
The lefthand side is
[TABLE]
and the righthand side is
[TABLE]
The equality of the second components gives a brace of size with additive group and multiplicative group . The first component in the lefthand side is
[TABLE]
and the first component in the righthand side is
[TABLE]
The equality of the first components is then equivalent to
[TABLE]
for all , hence to
[TABLE]
which is equivalent to
[TABLE]
for all , hence to being also a morphism with respect to .
We have then obtained that is the double semidirect product of the trivial brace and the skew brace . ∎
We recall now precisely the correspondence between braces and regular subgroups of the holomorph given by Guarnieri and Vendramin. We note that, if is a regular subgroup of , then
[TABLE]
is bijective.
Proposition 5** ([6] th. 4.2).**
Let be a skew left brace. Then
[TABLE]
is a regular subgroup of , isomorphic to .
Conversely, if is a group and is a regular subgroup of , then is a skew left brace with , where
[TABLE]
and .
These assignments give a bijective correspondence between the set of isomorphism classes of skew left braces and the set of conjugation classes of regular subgroups of .
Using this correspondence we can see how braces of size give braces of size and how to obtain braces of size from the trivial brace of size of size and braces of size .
Let be a brace of size with additive group , as above, and multiplicative group . By applying Proposition 5, we obtain that is a regular subgroup of , isomorphic to . Now, for , we have
[TABLE]
hence , where is the projection on the second component.
Let us see these regular groups explicitly in . Following [5], the automorphisms of can be described as matrices
[TABLE]
with , , such that and a -cocycle. The action on is given by
[TABLE]
Under our hypothesis, Schur Zassenhaus condition on subgroups of order being conjugates of by elements in leaves us with the coboundaries
[TABLE]
For a trivial , we get the direct product and for a non trivial the group has order with . This subgroup is the stabilizer of under the action
[TABLE]
The orbit of gives the such that .
All together, if we write
[TABLE]
then
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
where indicates operation in . For a brace as before, this is the operation. The set is stable under this operation. For the multiplicative group , if we have
[TABLE]
The set is a group isomorphic to , and a regular subgroup of . This describes the subbbrace of with additive structure isomorphic to and multiplicative structure isomorphic to . Notice that in the description of automorphisms of we got the condition , namely for all .
From the above, we have also obtained a way to construct a brace of size from a brace of size . If is a group of order , and is a regular subgroup of such that is inside the stabilizer of by the action of , then for any
[TABLE]
is a regular subgroup of isomorphic to
But we can also consider the opposite group operation on , so that elements in are , with and . Then,
[TABLE]
is a regular embedding which restricted to provides an embedding of :
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Using again [6] we get the regular subgroup
[TABLE]
isomorphic to .
Proposition 6**.**
Let be a prime and a positive integer not divisible by and such that every group of order has a normal subgroup of order . Let a brace of order with additive structure and multiplicative structure . For every and every ,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
are regular subgroups of isomorphic to .
We have for any . For a nontrivial , and are not conjugate in .
Any regular subgroup of isomorphic to is conjugate to or by an element of .
When , the coboundaries are also trivial, and both subgroups are equal. For a nontrivial , since is abelian, the first coefficient of the matrix is invariant under conjugation, and this shows that the groups are not conjugate in for any .
Let us prove the last statement. If is a regular subgroup isomorphic to , then via , using [6] and , we get a semiregular embedding of in ,
[TABLE]
so that and , and the embedding is
[TABLE]
for some . It is easy to check that conjugation by elements in splits this family into two classes represented by and for any , and that conjugation is given by an element in .
On the other hand, we get a semiregular embedding of in . By [6] and using , it has to be
[TABLE]
with . The conjugacy class by elements of of the image of is
[TABLE]
so that and are not conjugate when . Notice that It is equal to if and only if is a brace automorphism. Notice also that the image is invariant under conjugation by . This gives the following result.
Proposition 7**.**
Let be regular subgroups of giving multiplicative structures for a brace of order . If and are conjugate in then they are conjugate in .
Back to the proof of the previous proposition, up to conjugation by elements in , the group has to be the semidirect product of and either or . An easy computation shows that the only possibilities are those corresponding to and , namely and or and . Indeed,
[TABLE]
gives the image of the product if and only if , and
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
gives the image of the product if and only if and .
In order to count different brace structures, we have to determine conjugation orbits in the families and or equivalently, isomorphism classes of braces structures. Therefore, we should take up to brace automorphisms of and up to brace automorphisms of .
2.1 Algorithm
Our aim is to determine all skew braces of size from skew braces of size . Therefore we need a precomputation
Step 0
Determine isomorphism classes of groups of order and the number of braces of size of each type , identifying with a representative for a conjugacy class of regular subgroups of .
For every compute the stabilisers for the action
[TABLE]
namely, .
Next, we consider as an input a pair , namely a brace . The steps to count all the braces of size having additive group isomorphic to and multiplicative group isomorphic to are the following:
Step 1
Determine
Step 2
Determine
Step 3
Compute the number of orbits of the action
[TABLE]
Notice that the orbit of , which corresponds to the direct product, has a single element. The remaining orbits will give rise to two different braces.
The number of additive structures for is the number of orbits. Since orbits preserve order and isomorphism class of kernel, we can keep track of the number of structures according to these parameters.
Step 4
For each in a system of representatives of the above orbits, compute orbits of the action
[TABLE]
Notice that is a subgroup of the normaliser of in .
The number of multiplicative structures for is twice the number of orbits except for trivial, when we get a single one. Since orbits preserve order and isomorphism class of kernel, we can keep track of the number of structures according to these parameters.
2.2 Number of braces of size
Taking into account the description given in terms of orbits, using the Burnside lemma we can give formulas for the number of different braces of size in terms of the number of braces of size .
Theorem 8**.**
Let be a prime and a positive integer not divisible by and such that every group of order has a normal subgroup of order . For braces of size the number of additive structures is
[TABLE]
where runs over the braces of size . The total amount of braces of size is
[TABLE]
where , runs over a system of representatives for additive structures and . The case , where , corresponds to the semidirect product of and the trivial brace of order . The remaining cases are double semidirect products of these two braces.
Equivalently, the number of additive structures can be expressed as
[TABLE]
and the total amount as
[TABLE]
where denotes the number of fixed points.
3 Groups of order 12 and skew braces of size 12
There are five groups of order 12, up to isomorphism, two abelian ones and and three non-abelian ones, the alternating group , the dihedral group and the dicyclic group . By computation with Magma, we obtain that the number of skew left braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table.
[TABLE]
We determine now for each group of order 12, its automorphism group , the group and stabilizers of the corresponding group action.
Since is a cyclic group of order , for each it has a unique subgroup of order . We write for . In order to have elements in with image it is necessary that , where is the exponent of the group .
3.1
Let . Then, with . If , then
[TABLE]
If , then the order of in is . The Euler totient function gives the number of having order . Such a sigma can be identified as a pair meaning for relatively prime to . Elements of the same order are in the same orbit under the action of
[TABLE]
and the size of the kernel parametrizes the orbits. As for stabilisers, since
[TABLE]
we have which identifies as subgroup of . In the following table we compile all the information:
[TABLE]
The number of isomorphism classes of semidirect products is equal to the number of divisors of , namely , and can be labelled by the size of (size 12 means direct product):
[TABLE]
3.2
Let us write , with of order 6, of order 2. The automorphism group is , where
[TABLE]
has order 2, has order 6 and .
Since the exponent of is , elements have order dividing . If , we have
[TABLE]
For each , if we write for
[TABLE]
we get the following orbits for the action of
[TABLE]
and again the order determines the orbit. Therefore, the size of kernel parameterise isomorphism classes of semidirect products.
[TABLE]
Finally, let us compute stabilizers for the first element in each orbit and take the corresponding conjugates. If , then and we have . Since has index 6, this is the stabilizer for . For the other values, the (cyclic) orbits above show the power of that we have to take: for and for .
[TABLE]
3.3
Let be the alternating group , and take generators and . We have , the isomorphism given by restriction to of inner automorphisms of . Therefore the action is
[TABLE]
for any .
Since the exponent of is , nontrivial elements have order , which forces them to be trivial on and every element of order 2, namely, . For , and for
[TABLE]
For any such that has order 1 or 2, for example , we have so that they are in the same orbit for the action of . The stabiliser is a normal subgroup of of index , namely .
[TABLE]
3.4
Let us write . We note that is generated by
[TABLE]
has order 2, has order 6 and , hence .
Since has exponent and the unique normal subgroups with cyclic kernel are those of índex 2, we have that for every ,
[TABLE]
has cyclic kernel while and have kernel isomorphic to dihedral group . Therefore, they give at have at least two orbits under the action of . Since and , namely , we have three orbits for the action, which means three isomorphism classes of semidirect (or direct) products , parameterised by the isomorphism class of the kernel. For , we denote (cyclic kernel), while for we write (dihedral kernel).
As for stabilisers, the size is determined by the length of the orbit and we have
[TABLE]
Therefore, the action of can be described as follows:
[TABLE]
3.5
Let us write . The group is generated by
[TABLE]
has order 2, has order 6 and , hence .
The exponent of the dicyclic group is (the element has order ) and the normal subgroups with cyclic quotient are and the derived subgroup . Therefore, for all and the image of determines . If , we have
[TABLE]
Again, we can identify the elements by a pair . For we have a single element, and for , since , we have and in the same orbit. In this case, the stabiliser is a normal subgroup of of index . We have
[TABLE]
and Therefore, the action goes as follows:
[TABLE]
4 Skew braces of size
Once we have done the precomputations for all groups , we bring in the multiplicative group of the brace . In all the sub-cases we follow the procedure described at the end of Section 2 and the notations in Section 3 for , and .
4.1
According to the table in Section 3 and Proposition 4, for a brace of size 12 with multiplicative group , the additive group can be any group except for . In all the sub-cases the group is as in 3.1 so that identifies as a pair meaning that the given generator of has image
Case
Let . There is a unique conjugacy class of regular subgroups of isomorphic to , given by the normal subgroup
[TABLE]
We have stabilisers Since we have . Since is a normal subgroup of , we have for all and Therefore, the orbits of the action of on are those computed in 3.1 and we have one orbit for each size of kernel. The number of addditive structures is the number of divisors .
Finally we have to compute orbits of the action of on . Since we have and in the same orbit if and only if for some . Therefore, we have the following representatives for the orbits
[TABLE]
If we count the number of classes according to the size of , we obtain
[TABLE]
For , the trivial , we have one structure for each , otherwise we have two multiplicative structures for each additive one.
Proposition 9**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for a kernel of size to occur.
[TABLE]
Case
We write . There is one brace with additive group and multiplicative group , hence one conjugation class of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . We may consider as representative the following regular subgroup
[TABLE]
where is if is even and if is odd.
Since , computation of stabilisers in 3.2 gives that the ’s to consider are for every , meaning , . Since there is only one for each order, they give a set of representatives for the action of . Therefore, we have 4 possible additive structures.
We consider now and the action by elements such that . We need , that is, belongs to the centraliser of , which is the Klein group . We have
[TABLE]
For we have all these automorphisms in , therefore, and are conjugate. If , the intersection between and the centralizer is and the orbit consists just in and . Therefore, we have the following representatives for the orbits:
[TABLE]
Proposition 10**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for a kernel of size to occur.
[TABLE]
Case
We write . There are two braces with additive group and multiplicative group , hence two conjugation classes of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . We may consider the following regular subgroups of isomorphic to ,
[TABLE]
where is for even and for odd, and
[TABLE]
where is for even and for odd. The groups and are not conjugate in , hence and are not conjugate in . These groups show also that the unique nontrivial element in to consider is , meaning , whose stabiliser is . Therefore, we have 2 additive structures for each . The nontrivial one has cyclic kernel and we denoted it by .
Regarding orbits on , since is a normal subgroup, we can take any in to satisfy . But
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Therefore, we are left with the automorphisms in which happens to be the normaliser of . For automorphisms of this group we have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Therefore, in we have just orbit for each .
Proposition 11**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for a kernel of size to occur.
[TABLE]
Case
We write . There are two braces with additive group and multiplicative group , hence two conjugation classes of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . We may consider representatives
[TABLE]
with and . Since , we have for all .
In order to compute brace automorphisms we consider first the normalizer of in , which is , and the normalizer of , which is . Since
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
we have one orbit for each order and 3 possible additive structures for each . On the other hand, we have
[TABLE]
and this shows that in both cases the automorphism group of the brace is the maximal subgroup .
For or , we have and acts on giving a single orbit for each order . But, for , we have . Then, and are in the same orbit if, and only if, , and we have orbits represented by
Proposition 12**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need where we need for a kernel of size to occur.
[TABLE]
4.2
According to the table in Section 3 and Proposition 4, for a brace of size 12 with multiplicative group , the additive group can be any group. In all the sub-cases the group is as in 3.2 so that identifies as a pair meaning for .
Case
There is one brace with additive group and multiplicative group , hence one conjugation class of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . We may consider the following representative,
[TABLE]
where has order 6, has order 2. Since we cannot consider of order 4 or 12. Since is a normal subgroup of all automorphisms of are brace automorphisms and we have a single orbit for each order. Therefore, we have 4 possible additive structures.
Regarding the action on , since
[TABLE]
we have the following orbits, acording to the order of :
[TABLE]
In the last two cases, when some points get disconnected and we have 2 and 4 orbits, respectively.
Proposition 13**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for a kernel of size to occur.
[TABLE]
Case
Let . There is one brace with additive group and multiplicative group , hence one conjugation class of regular subgroups of isomorphic to , which has to be that of the normal subgroup
[TABLE]
Clearly, we have a single orbit for each order of and 4 possible additive structures.
Regarding the action on , for we have one orbit for each order and for the orbit has a single point. According to the stabilisers and orbits computed in 3.2, in the remaining cases we have
[TABLE]
Proposition 14**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need where we need for a kernel of size to occur.
[TABLE]
Case
There are two braces with additive group and multiplicative group , hence two conjugation classes of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . We may consider the following representatives,
[TABLE]
where and have order 6 and have order 2. We have and . Therefore, on one hand we see that the groups are not conjugate in and one the other hand that we can consider all
Since , in order to find brace automorphisms we need in its normaliser, namely . We have
[TABLE]
Since , we have that for it is enough to consider . The normaliser of is all and we find
[TABLE]
Since we are also left with for . We have two additive structures for each .
We complete the description of the group of brace automorphisms, since
[TABLE]
shows that it is not and contains the maximal group . All together,
[TABLE]
The intersection with is
[TABLE]
To get the multiplicative structures we need the orbits of . We have the same action on generators , , so that
[TABLE]
and we obtain the following orbits:
[TABLE]
Proposition 15**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for a kernel of size to occur.
[TABLE]
Case
We write . There are two braces with additive group and multiplicative group , hence two conjugation classes of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . We may consider the following representatives:
[TABLE]
where have order 6, and have order 2. We have and . This shows that they are not conjugate and that they are subgroups of all the stabilisers . Moreover, since normalizes both and we have only one orbit in order with dihedral kernel and we have 3 additive structures.
Since the normaliser of is and
[TABLE]
we have that for the group of brace automorphisms is . On the other hand,
[TABLE]
shows that for the group of brace automorphisms is also the maximal subgroup . Since the action of generators is the same, there is no difference in computation of orbits for or . We obtain
[TABLE]
For of order with dihedral kernel and in first and last case orbits split.
Proposition 16**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for a kernel of size to occur.
[TABLE]
Case
We write . There are two braces with additive group and multiplicative group , hence two conjugation classes of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . We may consider the following representatives
[TABLE]
where have order 6, have order 2. We note that since the second component of is and the second components of and are equal to , they are not conjugated. We have and therefore we cannot consider order and then we have . We need to determine brace automorphisms in order to determine the orbits of the action on
The normaliser of in is and we have
[TABLE]
This group of brace automorphism gives raise to the following orbits
[TABLE]
and both groups give raise to the same number of multiplicative structures.
Proposition 17**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for a kernel of size to occur.
[TABLE]
4.3
According to the table in Section 3 and Proposition 4, for a brace with multiplicative group a semidirect product of and , the additive group is either a semidirect product of and or a semidirect product of and . In both sub-cases the group is as in 3.3 so that its elements are , with , defined by and trivial on elements of order 2.
Case
There is one brace with additive group and multiplicative group , hence one conjugation class of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . We may consider representative
[TABLE]
Indeed, has order 3, has order 2, and which has order 3. The Klein subgroup is .
We have and therefore it is a subgroup of only when has order or . For of order , we have . Since
[TABLE]
there is one orbit for each order and two different additive structures.
Let us check if elements of are brace automorphisms. Since
[TABLE]
the action on is just given by the identity and orbits consist on single elements. For a non trivial , and give different multiplicative structures.
Proposition 18**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for a kernel of size to occur.
[TABLE]
Case
There are four braces with additive group and multiplicative group , hence four conjugation classes of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . If we write and , we may consider the following representatives
[TABLE]
We have , , and . But they are not conjugate, since in all elements of order are of the form . On the other hand, we see that for all and all .
Since
[TABLE]
and and are invariant under we have for all and elements of order 3 of are in the same orbit. We have two possible additive structures for each .
As for morphisms , since stabilizes them, the action give orbits of a single elememt, so that we have one orbit in order 1 and two orbits in order 3.
Proposition 19**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for the group to occur.
[TABLE]
4.4
Let us assume that is isomorphic to the dihedral group . From the table in Section 3 we know that for a brace of size with multiplicative group , the additive group can be in any isomorphism class of groups of order except . Moreover, in all the sub-cases the group is as in 3.4, so identifies with any of the pairs . Let us call , and , so that has kernel isomorphic to and , have kernel isomorphic to .
Case
There are two braces with additive group and multiplicative group , hence two conjugation classes of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . These are represented by
[TABLE]
respectively. Here , have order and , have order . Since and , in both cases we have only for , . On the other hand, conjugating and by the three nontrivial automorphisms of , we obtain
[TABLE]
Hence, for every and . As for , the only such that is , so . In any case, each morphism give rise to two orbits (the ones at the first two rows at the first table in 3.1). For each of and , the first morphism gives an additive structure, while the second one gives two additive structures.
Now, we consider the morphisms . For , we have that with . If we now take , we need to consider the action of on , and we see that . Therefore, for each , the number of orbits of the action of over is as follows:
[TABLE]
Proposition 20**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table.
[TABLE]
Case
There is one brace with additive group and multiplicative group , and hence one conjugacy class of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . This is represented by
[TABLE]
Here has order , has order and .
Since , we have that only for and (corresponding to the first two rows of the final table at 3.2). On the other hand, it is easily checked that if and only if . None of these automorphisms satisfy that or , while . Hence, we obtain two orbits (other than the trivial one, given by ).
As for the morphisms , we have that if and only if , with , while for , no satisfies that . We collect the number of orbits for the action corresponding to each in the following table.
[TABLE]
Proposition 21**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table.
[TABLE]
Case
There are four braces with additive group and multiplicative group , and hence four conjugacy classes of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . These are represented by
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
For , has order , has order , and .
Let us call , and . We see immediately that , and . All of these are contained in for , so . On the other hand, we find that:
- •
For , for every .
- •
if and only if .
- •
if and only if .
Now, we have that if and only if is odd, but this is a brace automorphism only for and . Thus, other than the trivial one, there are two orbits for and and three orbits for and .
We examine the classes of morphisms . For , we have that if and only if is odd. Hence, under but define two different classes under . For , since , we have that . For , we have that if and only if is odd, so we obtain the same conclusions as with . Finally, for we have that , so .
We collect the numbers of orbits corresponding to each in the following tables.
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Proposition 22**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table.
[TABLE]
Case
There are four braces with additive group and multiplicative group , and hence four conjugacy classes of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . These are represented by
[TABLE]
We have that , , and . Hence, for each , only for with , in which case . On the other hand, we find that
[TABLE]
and for , for every .
Let us examine the classes of morphisms for each . For we have that , so . For , , whence neither. For , we see that with , hence . Finally, for , we see that , so . Then, the orbits for each are as in the following table.
[TABLE]
Proposition 23**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table.
[TABLE]
4.5
We take for the dicyclic group of order 12. According to the table in Section 3 and Proposition 4, for a brace of size 12 with multiplicative group , the additive group can be any group of order 12. In all the sub-cases the group is as in 3.5 so that identifies as a pair or .
Case
Let . There is one brace with additive group and multiplicative group , hence one conjugation class of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . We may consider representative
[TABLE]
where has order 3, has order 4 and .
Since we have only for with . Since is a normal subgroup of , we have . Since and are in the same orbit, the action of gives one orbit for each order. All together, we have 3 additive structures for if and 2 otherwise.
For of order or two, and the action on gives one orbit for each order. For of order , to consider the action of we just have to check the action of on . Since
[TABLE]
and are not in the same orbit and this gives two multiplicative structures with kernel of order 3 for .
Proposition 24**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for a kernel of size to occur.
[TABLE]
Case
We write . There is one brace with additive group and multiplicative group , hence one conjugation class of regular subgroups of isomorphic to for which we may consider as representative the following subgroup
[TABLE]
Since there is only one nontrivial to consider, namely that of order 2 identified as and defined by , which has stabiliser . Since we only have and , it is clear that they are fixed points for the action of and we have two orbits, namely 2 additive structures for .
Since is normal in , the elements of are brace automorphisms and to determine its action on , we just have to check the action on . From , we obtain that and there is just one orbit in order 4.
Proposition 25**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for the group to occur.
[TABLE]
Case
There are two braces with additive group and multiplicative group , hence two conjugation classes of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . We may consider the following representatives
[TABLE]
where have order 3, have order 4 and for . We have and which shows that are not conjugate in and that their projections are not subgroups of , so that we obtain only one additive structure for each , corresponding to the direct product.
Since in order to determine multiplicative structures, we have one orbit for order 1 and one for order 2, and we only need to check if and differ in a brace automorphism. We have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
So, for and we obtain one class of morphisms with kernel of order 6 and, if , there is another class of morphisms with kernel of order 3.
Proposition 26**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for the group to occur.
[TABLE]
Case
There are two braces with additive group and multiplicative group , hence two conjugation classes of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . We take representatives
[TABLE]
where have order 3, have order 4 and for .
Since and , we see that the groups are not conjugate and that the only nontrivial to consider is that of order with cyclic kernel. So, the number of additive structures for each is .
Again, to determine multiplicative structures it is enough to check if and differ in a brace automorphism. We have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
So, for each we obtain one orbit for each order.
Proposition 27**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for the group to occur.
[TABLE]
Case
There are two braces with additive group and multiplicative group , hence two conjugation classes of regular subgroups of isomorphic to . We may consider the following representatives
[TABLE]
where have order 3, have order 4 and for . Since and we see that groups are not conjugate and that we can consider all possible . We have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and Then, the number of additive structures for each is if and otherwise.
For , since , the above computation shows that and we have just one orbit of order 4. But for order 4, since is also the stabiliser of the ’s of order 4, we have fixed points and 2 orbits.
Proposition 28**.**
Let be a prime number, . The number of braces with additive group and multiplicative group is as shown in the following table, where we need for a kernel of size to occur.
[TABLE]
4.6 Total numbers
For a prime number we compile in the following tables the total number of skew left braces of size .
The additive group is a semidirect product and the multiplicative group is a semidirect product . In the first column we have the possible ’s and in the first row the possible ’s.
- •
If
[TABLE]
- •
If
[TABLE]
- •
If
[TABLE]
- •
If
[TABLE]
With the results summarized in the above tables, the validity of conjecture (1) is then established.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] V.G. Bardakov, M.V. Neshchadim, M.K. Yadav, Computing skew left braces of small orders , Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 30 (2020), no. 4, 839–851.
- 2[2] F. Cedó, Left Braces: Solutions of the Yang-Baxter Equation , Advances in Group Theory and Applications, 5 (2018), 3–90.
- 3[3] T. Crespo, D. Gil-Muñoz, A. Rio, M. Vela, Left braces of size 8 p 8 𝑝 8p , Journal of Algebra Volume 617, (2023), 317-339.
- 4[4] T. Crespo, D. Gil-Muñoz, A. Rio, M. Vela, Inducing braces and Hopf Galois structures , to appear in J. Pure Appl. Algebra (2023)
- 5[5] M. J. Curran, Automorphisms of semidirect products , Mathematical Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy Vol. 108A, No. 2 (2008), pp. 205-210
- 6[6] L. Guarnieri, L. Vendramin, Skew braces and the Yang-Baxter equation , Math. Comp. 86 (2017), 2519-2534.
- 7[7] W. Rump, Braces, radical rings, and the quantum Yang–Baxter equation , Journal of Algebra, 307 (2007), 153-170.
- 8[8] A. Smoktunowicz, L. Vendramin, On skew braces (with an appendix by N. Byott and L. Vendramin) , J. Comb. Algebra 2 no. 1 (2018), 47–86
